Early differential processing of material images: Evidence from ERP classification

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Wiebel, Christiane B ^a,b   Valsecchi, Matteo ^a   Gegenfurtner, Karl R ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERP; Go NoGo; linear classifier; Material categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ERP; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GO-NOGO; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LINEAR CLASSIFIER; MALE; MATERIAL CATEGORIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR CORTEX; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ERP; GO-NOGO; LINEAR CLASSIFIER; MATERIAL CATEGORIZATION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904258168     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/14.7.10     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brainard, D. H., & Maloney, L. T. (2004). Perception of color and material properties in complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 4(9):i, ii-iv, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/4/9/i, doi:10.1167/4.9.i. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Cant, J. S., Arnott, S. R., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). FMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 391-405.
3. Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2007). Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17(3), 713-731.
4. Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2011). Scratching beneath the surface: new insights into the functional properties of the lateral occipital area and parahippocampal place area. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 8248-8258.
5. Cavina-Pratesi, C., Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Milner, A. D. (2010a). Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: Evidence from FMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 20(10), 2319-2332.
6. Cavina-Pratesi, C., Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Milner, A. D. (2010b). Separate processing of texture and form in the ventral stream: Evidence from FMRI and visual agnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 20(2), 433-446.
7. Corel. (1996). Corel photo stock library [CD-ROM]. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.
8. Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., & Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(2), 171-180.
9. Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12), 2379-2394.
10. Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., & Adelson, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5):3, 347-368, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/3/5/3, doi:10.1167/3.5.3. [PubMed] [Article]
11. Fleming, R. W., Wiebel, C. B., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2013). Perceptual qualities and material classes. Journal of Vision, 13(8):9, 1-20, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/13/8/9, doi:10.1167/ 13.8.9. [PubMed] [Article]
12. Giesel, M., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2010). Color appearance of real objects varying in material, hue, and shape. Journal of Vision, 10(9):10, 1-21, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/10, doi:10. 1167/10.9.10. [PubMed] [Article]
13. Hiramatsu, C., Goda, N., & Komatsu, H. (2011). Transformation from image-based to perceptual representation of materials along the human ventral visual pathway. Neuroimage, 57(2), 482-494.
14. Ho, Y. X., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (2008). Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychological Science, 19(2), 196-204.
15. Johnson, J. S., & Olshausen, B. A. (2005). The earliest EEG signatures of object recognition in a cuedtarget task are postsensory. Journal of Vision, 5(4): 2, 299-312, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/5/4/2, doi:10.1167/5.4.2. [PubMed] [Article]
16. Johnson, J. S., & Olshausen, B. A. (2003). Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. Journal of Vision, 3(7):4, 499-512, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/3/7/4, doi:10.1167/3.7. 4. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2010). Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 10(9):3, 1-17, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/9/3, doi:10.1167/10. 9.3. [PubMed] [Article]
18. Liu, C., Sharan, L., Adelson, E. H., & Rosenholtz, R. (2010, June). Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010 IEEE Conference (pp. 239-246). San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
19. Liu, H., Agam, Y., Madsen, J. R., & Kreiman, G. (2009). Timing, timing, timing: Fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron, 62(2), 281-290.
20. Maloney, L. T., & Brainard, D. H. (2010). Color and material perception: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Vision, 10(9):19, 1-6, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/9/19, doi:10.1167/ 10.9.19. [PubMed] [Article]
21. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447(7141), 206-209.
22. Olkkonen, M., Witzel, C., Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2010). Categorical color constancy for real surfaces. Journal of Vision, 10(9):16, 1-22, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/16, doi:10. 1167/10.9.16. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000). A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40(1), 49-71.
24. Rieger, J. W., Reichert, C., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Noesselt, T., Braun, C., Heinze, H. J., ... Hinrichs, H. (2008). Predicting the recognition of natural scenes from single trial MEG recordings of brain activity. Neuroimage, 42(3), 1056-1068.
25. Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7), 629-630.
26. Rousselet, G. A., Mace, M. J., Thorpe, S. J., & Fabre- Thorpe, M. (2007). Limits of event-related potential differences in tracking object processing speed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1241-1258.
27. Sharan, L. (2009). The perception of material qualities in real-world images (Ph.D. Thesis). Massachussets Institute of Technology, http://dspace.mit.edu/ handle/1721.1/54644.
28. Simanova, I., van Gerven, M., Oostenveld, R., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Identifying object categories from event-related EEG: Toward decoding of conceptual representations. PLoS One, 5(12), e14465.
29. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520-522.
30. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 454-461.
31. Wiebel, C. B., Valsecchi, M., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2013). The speed and accuracy of material recognition in natural images. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 75(5), 954-966.