Redefining information systems security: Viable information systems

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 65, Issue , 2002, Pages 453-467

  Karyda, Maria ^a   Kokolakis, Spyros ^b   Kiountouzis, Evangelos ^a  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cybernetics; Information systems; Information systems security; Viable information systems

Indexed keywords

CYBERNETICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY; SECURE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SECURITY ATTRIBUTES;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 84904252076     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ashby, R.W. (1964). An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Baskerville, R. (1991). Risk analysis: an interpretive feasibility tool in justifying information systems security. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), pp.121-130.
3. th International Conference on Information Security, May 1997, Copenhagen.
4. Beer, S. (1984). The Viable System Model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of Operational Research Society, 35, pp.7-26.
5. Beer, S. (1979). The heart of the enterprise. John Wiley, Chichester, England.
6. nd Edition) John Wiley, Chichester, England.
7. Brocklesby, J. and Cummings, S. (1996). Designing a viable organization. Long Range Planning, 29(1), Elsevier Science Ltd.
8. Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. (1998). Information, systems and information systems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
9. CSI - Computer Security Institute (2000). Issues and Trends: 2000 CSI/FBI Computer Crime and Security Survey. Computer Security Institute, USA.
10. Davidow, W. and Malone, M. (1992). The virtual corporation, Harper Business, New York.
11. th Canadian Information Technology Security Symposium (CITSS), Canada.
12. Ellof, M. and von Solms, S. (2000). Information security: process evaluation and product evaluation. In the proceedings of IFIP/TC11, 16th Annual Working Conference on Information Security, August 2000, China.
13. nd Annual Global Information Security Survey. Ernst&Young LLP, USA.
14. Hitchings, J. (1996). Achieving an integrated design: the way forward for information security. In Ellof, J. and von Solms, S. (eds), Information Security - the Next Decade, IFIP SEC'95, Chapman & Hall, London.
15. Jayaratha, N. (1994). Understanding and evaluating methodologies: NIMSAD, a systemic framework. Mc Graw-Hill, London
16. Lipson, H. and Fisher, D. (1999). Survivability - a new technical and business perspective on security. In the proceedings of the New Security Paradigm Workshop June 1999, Canada.
17. Mayer, R.J., Benjamin, P.C., Caraway, B.E. and Painter, M.K. (1995). A framework and a suite of methods for business process reengineering. In Grover, V. and Kettinger, W.J. (eds), Business process change: concepts, methods and technologies. IDEA Group Publishing, Harrisburg, USA.
18. Mowshowitz, A. (1997). Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), pp. 30-37.
19. Parker, D. (1996). A new framework for information security to avoid information anarchy. In Ellof, J. and von Solms, S. (eds.), Information Security - the Next Decade, IFIP SEC'95, Chapman & Hall, London.
20. Warren, M. (1996). A security advisory system for healthcare environments. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth. U.K.
21. Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Addison-Wesley, USA.
22. Yngstrom, L. (1996). A holistic approach to IT security. In Ellof, J. and von Solms, S. (eds.), Information Security - the Next Decade, IFIP SEC'95, Chapman & Hall, London.