Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: Insights from fisher's geometric model

Genetics

Volumn 197, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 991-1006

  Connallon, Tim ^a   Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BALANCING SELECTION; DIPLOIDY; DNA POLYMORPHISM; FISHER GEOMETRIC MODEL; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOIDY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HETEROZYGOTE; HETEROZYGOTE ADVANTAGE; HOMOZYGOSITY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SEX LINKAGE; SEXUAL ANTAGONISM; SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC SELECTION; SIMULATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84904244982     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165605     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and S. P. Otto, 2005 Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 310: 119-121.
2. Arnqvist, G., 2011 Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation. Evolution 65: 2111-2116.
3. Berger, D., K. Grieshop, M. I. Lind, J. Goenaga, A. A. Maklakov et al., 2014 Intralocus sexual conflict and environmental stress. Evolution DOI: 10.1111/evo.12439.
4. Blackburn, G. S., A. Y. K. Albert, and S. P. Otto, 2010 The evolution of sex ratio adjustment in the presence of sexually antagonistic selection. Am. Nat. 176: 264-275.
5. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth, 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 280-288.
6. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth, 1999 The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74: 329-340.
7. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth, 2010 Elements of Evolutionary Genetics. Roberts & Co., Greenwood Village, Colorado.
8. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes, 1999 The quantitative genetics of life history traits, pp. 369-392 in Evolutionary Genetics From Molecules to Morphology, edited by R. S. Singh, and C. B. Krimbas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Charlesworth, B., C. Y. Jordan, and D. Charlesworth, 2014 The evolutionary dynamics of sexually antagonistic mutations in pseudoau-tosomal regions of sex chromosomes. Evolution 68: 1339-1350.
10. Charlesworth, D., 2006 Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genet. 2: e64.
11. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth, 1980 Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genet. Res. 35: 205-214.
12. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice, 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1671-1675.
13. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2010 Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution 64: 3417-3442.
14. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2011 The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication. Genetics 187: 919-937.
15. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2012 A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation. Genetics 190: 1477-1489.
16. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2013a Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003440.
17. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2013b Antagonistic versus non-antagonistic models of balancing selection: characterizing the relative timescales and hitchhiking effects of partial selective sweeps. Evolution 67: 908-917.
18. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark, 2014 The evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281: 20132123.
19. Connallon, T., R. M. Cox, and R. Calsbeek, 2010 Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64: 1671-1682.
20. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek, 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173: 176-187.
21. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura, 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis.
22. Curtsinger, J. W., 1980 On the opportunity for polymorphism with sex-linkage or haplodiploidy. Genetics 96: 995-1006.
23. Curtsinger, J. W., P. M. Service, and T. Prout, 1994 Antagonistic pleiotropy, reversal of dominance, and genetic polymorphism. Am. Nat. 144: 210-228.
24. Day, T., and R. Bonduriansky, 2004 Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167: 1537-1546.
25. Delcourt, M., M. W. Blows, and H. D. Rundle, 2009 Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and novel environment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276: 2009-2014.
26. Dobzhansky, T., 1955 A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 20: 1-15.
27. Ellegren, H., and J. Parsch, 2007 The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 689-698.
28. Ewens, W. J., 2004 Mathematical Population Genetics. I. Theoretical Introduction, Ed. 2. Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Ewens, W. J., and G. Thomson, 1970 Heterozygote selective advantage. Ann. Hum. Genet. 33: 365-376.
30. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ed. 4. Longmans Green, Harlow, Essex, UK.
31. Fisher, R. A., 1922 On the dominance ratio. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 42: 321-341.
32. Fisher, R. A., 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
33. Fry, J. D., 2010 The genomic location of sexually antagonistic genetic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64: 1510-1516.
34. Gavrilets, S., and W. R. Rice, 2006 Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 3031-3038.
35. Gillespie, J. H., 1978 A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. V. The SAS-CFF model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14: 1-45.
36. Gillespie, J. H., 2004 Population Genetics: A Concise Guide. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
37. Gosden, T. P., K. L. Shastri, P. Innocenti, and S. F. Chenoweth, 2012 The B-matrix harbours significant and sex-specific con straints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66: 2106-2116.
38. Griffin, R. M., R. Dean, J. L. Grace, P. Ryden, and U. Friberg, 2013 The shared genome is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 2168-2176.
39. Haldane, J. B. S., and S. D. Jayakar, 1963 Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. J. Genet. 48: 237-242.
40. Hedrick, P. W., 1974 Genetic variation in a heterogeneous environment. I. Temporal heterogeneity and the absolute dominance model. Genetics 78: 757-770.
41. Hedrick, P. W., 2012 What is the evidence for heterozygote advantage selection? Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 698-704.
42. Hesketh, J., K. Fowler, and M. Reuter, 2013 Genetic drift in antagonistic genes leads to divergence in sex-specific fitness between experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 67: 1503-1510.
43. Holman, L., and H. Kokko, 2013 The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368: 20120053.
44. Houle, D., 1992 Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
45. Houle, D., and J. Fierst, 2012 Properties of spontaneous muta-tional variance and covariance for wing size and shape in Dro-sophila melanogaster. Evolution 67: 1116-1130.
46. Johnston, S. E., J. Gratten, C. Berenos, J. G. Pilkington, T. H. Clutton-Brock et al., 2013 Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502: 93-95.
47. Jordan, C. Y., and D. Charlesworth, 2012 The potential for sexually antagonistic polymorphism in different genomic regions. Evolution 66: 505-516.
48. Kidwell, J. F., M. T. Clegg, F. M. Stewart, and T. Prout, 1977 Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes. Genetics 85: 171-183.
49. Kimura, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
50. Kirkpatrick, M., 2009 Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136: 271-284.
51. Kirkpatrick, M., and R. F. Guerrero, 2014 Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes. Genetics 197: 531-541.
52. Kokko, H., and R. Brooks, 2003 Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40: 207-219.
53. Lande, R., 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
54. Leffler, E. M., Z. Gao, S. Pfeifer, L. Segurel, A. Auton et al., 2013 Multiple instances of ancient balancing selection shared between humans and chimpanzees. Science 339: 1578-1582.
55. Levene, H., 1953 Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87: 331-333.
56. Lewis, Z., N. Wedell, and J. Hunt, 2011 Evidence for strong intra-locus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunc-tella. Evolution 65: 2085-2097.
57. Lewontin, R. C., 1974 The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.
58. Livingstone, F. B., 1992 Polymorphism and differential selection for the sexes. Hum. Biol. 64: 649-657.
59. Long, A. D., R. F. Lyman, A. H. Morgan, C. H. Langley, and T. F. C. Mackay, 2000 Both naturally occurring insertions of transpos-able elements and intermediate frequency polymorphisms at the achaete-scute complex are associated with variation in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154: 1255-1269.
60. Long, T. A. F., A. F. Agrawal, and L. Rowe, 2012 The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr. Biol. 22: 204-208.
61. Mank, J. E., 2009 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: lessons from the genome. Am. Nat. 173: 141-150.
62. Manna, F., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand, 2011 Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation. Genetics 189: 923-937.
63. Marsaglia, G., 1972 Choosing a point from the surface of a sphere. Ann. Math. Stat. 43: 645-646.
64. Martin, G., 2014 Fisher's geometrical model emerges as a property of complex integrated phenotypic networks. Genetics 197: 237-255.
65. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand, 2006 A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 6: 893-907.
66. Michael, J. R., and W. R. Schucany, 2002 The mixture approach for simulating bivariate distributions with specified correlations. Am. Stat. 56: 48-54.
67. Mokkonen, M., H. Kokko, E. Koskela, J. Lehtonen, T. Mappes et al., 2011 Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science 334: 972-974.
68. Muller, M. E., 1959 A note on a method for generating points uniformly on N-dimensional spheres. Comm. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 2: 19-20.
69. Mullon, C., A. Pomiankowski, and M. Reuter, 2012 The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution 66: 3743-3753.
70. Nagylaki, T., 1979 Selection in dioecious populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 14: 143-150.
71. Nei, M., and A. K. Roychoudhury, 1973 Probability of fixation and mean fixation time of an overdominant mutation. Genetics 74: 371-380.
72. Orr, H. A., 1998 The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
73. Orr, H. A., 2000 Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54: 13-20.
74. Orr, H. A., 2005a The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 119-127.
75. Orr, H. A., 2005b Theories of adaptation: what they do and don't say. Genetica 123: 3-13.
76. Orr, H. A., 2006 The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations in Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. J. Theor. Biol. 238: 279-285.
77. Orr, H. A., 2010 The population genetics of beneficial mutations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 1195-1201.
78. Otto, S. P., and T. Day, 2007 A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
79. Pamilo, P., 1979 Genic variation at sex-linked loci: quantification of regular selection models. Hereditas 91: 129-133.
80. Parsch, J., and H. Ellegren, 2013 The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14: 83-87.
81. Patten, M. M., and D. Haig, 2009 Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism at a sex-linked locus. Evolution 63: 2888-2895.
82. Patten, M. M., D. Haig, and F. Ubeda, 2010 Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium. Evolution 64: 3638-3642.
83. Patten, M. M., F. Ubeda, and D. Haig, 2013 Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280: 2013117.
84. Pennell, T. M., and E. H. Morrow, 2013 Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict. Ecol. Evol. 3: 1819-1834.
85. Poissant, J., A. J. Wilson, and D. W. Coltman, 2010 Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64: 97-107.
86. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Moller, 1995 A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. Biol. Sci. 260: 21-29.
87. Prout, T., 1968 Sufficient conditions for multiple niche polymorphism. Am. Nat. 102: 493-496.
88. Prout, T., 2000 How well does opposing selection maintain variation? pp. 157-181 in Evolution Genetics: from Molecules to Morphology, edited by R. S. Singh, and C. B. Krimbas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
89. Punzalan, D., M. Delcourt, and H. D. Rundle, 2014 Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata. Heredity 112: 143-148.
90. Rice, S. H., 2004 Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
91. Rice, W. R., 1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
92. Rice, W. R., 1992 Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256: 1436-1439.
93. Robertson, A., 1962 Selection for heterozygotes in small populations. Genetics 47: 1291-1300.
94. Rodgers, J. L., and W. A. Nicewander, 1988 Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am. Stat. 42: 59-66.
95. Rose, M. R., 1982 Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation. Heredity 48: 63-78.
96. Roze, D., and S. P. Otto, 2012 Differential selection between the sexes and selection for sex. Evolution 66: 558-574.
97. Seger, J., and R. Trivers, 1986 Asymmetry in the evolution of female mating preferences. Nature 319: 771-773.
98. Sellis, D., B. J. Callahan, D. A. Petrov, and P. W. Messer, 2011 Heterozygote advantage as a natural consequence of adaptation in diploids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 20666-20671.
99. Stearns, S. C., D. R. Govindaraju, D. Ewbank, and S. G. Byars, 2012 Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279: 4836-4844.
100. Stulp, G., B. Kuijper, A. P. Buunk, T. V. Pollet, and S. Verhulst, 2012 Intralocus sexual conflict over human height. Biol. Lett. 23: 976-978.
101. Turelli, M., and N. H. Barton, 2004 Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G3E interactions. Genetics 166: 1053-1079.
102. Unckless, R. L., and J. K. Herren, 2009 Population genetics of sexually antagonistic mitochondrial mutants under inbreeding. J. Theor. Biol. 260: 132-136.
103. van Doorn, G. S., 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1168: 52-71.
104. van Doorn, G. S., and M. Kirkpatrick, 2007 Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 449: 909-912.
105. van Doorn, G. S., and M. Kirkpatrick, 2010 Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection. Genetics 186: 629-645.
106. Waxman, D., and J. J. Welch, 2005 Fisher's microscope and Hal-dane's ellipse. Am. Nat. 166: 447-457.
107. Whitlock, M. C., and A. F. Agrawal, 2009 Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63: 569-582.
108. Wright, A. E., and J. E. Mank, 2013 The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 1841-1853.
109. Wright, S., 1969 Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.