Author reply: Once again, menstrual cycles and mate preferences

Emotion Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 258-260

  Wood, Wendy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender roles; Mate preferences; Menstrual cycle

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904189619     PISSN: 17540739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1754073914523053     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Brown, G. R., Cross, C. P., Street, S. E., & Brand, C. O. (2014). Comment:Beyond "evolutionary versus social":Moving the cycle shift debate forward. Emotion Review, 6, 250-251.
2. Chrisler, J. C., & Levy, K. B. (1990). The media construct a menstrual monster:A content analysis of PMS articles in the popular press. Women & Health, 16, 89-104.
3. Dwan, K., Gamble, C., Williamson, P. R., & Kirkham, J. J. (2013). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias -An updated review. PloS One, 8, e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
4. Ferguson, C. J. (2014). Comment:Why meta-analyses rarely resolve ideological debates. Emotion Review, 6, 251-252.
5. Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (in press). Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin.
6. Harris, C. R., Chabot, A., & Mickes, L. (2013). Shifts in methodology and theory in menstrual cycle research on attraction. Sex Roles, 69, 525-535. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0302-3
7. Hyde, J. S., & Salk, R. H. (2014). Comment:Menstrual cycle fluctuations in women's mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 253-254.
8. Jones, B. C. (2014). Comment:Alternatives to Wood et al.'s conclusions. Emotion Review, 6, 254-256.
9. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
10. Ruble, D. N. (1977). Premenstrual symptoms:A reinterpretation. Science, 197(4300), 291-292.
11. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology:Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366.
12. van Anders, S. M. (2013). Beyond masculinity:Testosterone, gender/sex, and human social behavior in a comparative context. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 34, 198-210. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.001
13. van Anders, S. M. (2014). Comment:The social neuroendocrinology example:Incorporating culture resolves biobehavioral evolutionary paradoxes. Emotion Review, 6, 256-257.
14. Wood, W., & Carden, L. (in press). Elusiveness of menstrual cycle effects on mate preferences:Comment on Gildersleeve, Haseton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin.
15. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Advantages of certainty and uncertainty. in H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 455-472). New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women's mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229-249.
17. Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman's shadow:Nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176-1185. doi:10.1177/0956797612441004