The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 393-403

  Smeets, Edward ^a   Tabeau, Andrzej ^a   Van Berkum, Siemen ^a,b   Moorad, Jamil ^a   Van Meijl, Hans ^a   Woltjer, Geert ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Seanama Conservation Consultancy   (Botswana)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Ethanol; Greenhouse gas emissions; Indirect fuel use change; Life cycle analysis; Rebound effects

Indexed keywords

BIODIESEL; BLENDING; CRUDE OIL PRICE; ETHANOL; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS FUEL ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE; PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;

BIOFUEL POLICIES; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; CONVENTIONAL GASOLINE; FUEL USE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION; REBOUND EFFECT; STATE OF RESEARCH;

BIOFUELS;

EID: 84904113021     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.035     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. G. Sorda, M. Banse, and C. Kemfert An overview of biofuel policies across the world Energy Policy 38 2010 6977 6988
2. OECD, IEA. Technology Roadmap: Biofuels for Transport. Paris, France: Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); International Energy Agency (IEA); 2011.
3. IEA World Energy Outlook 2011 2011 International Energy Agency Paris, France p. 660
4. EC. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Brussels: European Commission; 2009.
5. ECN. Renewable Energy projections as published in the national renewable energy action plans of the European member states. Energy Centre of the Netherlands; 2011. p. 270.
6. EC. Proposal for a directive amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. COM(2012) 595 final. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2012.
7. BioGrace. Harmonised calculations of biofuel greenhouse gas emissions. Accessible via: http://www.biograce.net/; 2011.
8. R.J. Plevin, M.A. Delucchi, and F. Creutzig Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation benefits misleads policy makers J Ind Ecol 18 2014 73 83
9. A. Marvuglia, E. Benetto, S. Rege, and C. Jury Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: critical review and proposed framework for biogas production Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25 2013 768 781
10. C. De Lucia, and M. Bartlett Implementing a biofuel economy in the EU: lessons from the SUSTOIL project and future perspectives for next generation biofuels Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29 2014 22 30
11. D. Rajagopal, G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies Energy Policy 39 2011 228 233
12. G. Hochman, D. Rajagopal, and D. Zilberman The effect of biofuels on crude oil markets AgBioForum 2010 13
13. G. Oladosu Estimates of the global indirect energy-use emission impacts of USA biofuel policy Appl Energy 99 2012 85 96
14. H. De Gorter Does U.S. corn-ethanol really reduce emissions by 21%? Lessons for Europe Biofuels 1 2010 671 673
15. H. De Gorter, and D.R. Just The economics of a blend Mandate for biofuels Am J Agric Econ 91 2009 738 750
16. D. Drabik, and H. De Gorter Biofuel policies and carbon leakage AgBioForum 14 2011 104 110
17. Taheripour F., Tyner W. Induced Land Use Emissions due to First and Second Generation Biofuels and Uncertainty in Land Use Emission Factors. Economics Research International, 2013, p. 12.
18. W. Thompson, J. Whistance, and S. Meyer Effects of US biofuel policies on US and world petroleum product markets with consequences for greenhouse gas emissions Energy Policy 39 2011 5509 5518
19. D. Laborde Assessing the land use change consequences of european biofuel policies - final report 2011 International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Washington D.C., USA
20. X. Chen, M. Khanna, and H. Huang Land-use and greenhouse gas implications of biofuels: role of technology and policy Climate Change Economics. 03 2012 250013-1 250013-25
21. D. Gately, and H. Huntington The Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Price and Income on Energy and Oil Demand The Energy Journal. 23 2002 19 55 (Pubitemid 34278784)
22. H. Ramcharran Oil production responses to price changes: an emperical application of the competitive model to OPEC and non-OPEC countries Energy Economics. 24 2002 97 106 (Pubitemid 36003334)
23. F. Van der Ploeg, and C. Withagen Is there really a green paradox? J Environ Econ Manag 64 2012 342 363
24. T. Hertel, and M. Tsigas Structure of the standard GTAP model. Global trade analysis: modelling of applications 1997 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom
25. J.-M. Burniaux, and T.P. Truong GTAP-E: an energy-environmental version of the GTAP model. GTAP Technical Paper 16 2002 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
26. G. Woltjer, and M. Kuiper The MAGNET model - module description 2013 LEI - part of Wageningen UR The Hague, The Netherlands (team L-M)
27. J. Bruinsma World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 An FAO perspective Rome 2003 FAO Italy
28. Gehlhar M, Winston A, Somwaru A. Effects of increased biofuels on the U.S. Economy in 2022. Economic Research Report No (ERR-102) United State Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2010. p. 36.
29. Stoft, S. Renewable Fuel and the Global Rebound Effect. Research Paper 10-06, Global Energy Policy Center, USA.