The COMT Val158Met polymorphism regulates the effect of a dopamine antagonist on the feedback-related negativity

Psychophysiology

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 805-809

  Mueller, Erik M ^a   Burgdorf, Christin ^b   Chavanon, Mira Lynn ^b   Schweiger, Desiree ^b   Hennig, Jürgen ^a   Wacker, Jan ^c   Stemmler, Gerhard ^b  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

COMT; Dopamine; Feedback processing; Reward

Indexed keywords

CATECHOL O-METHYLTRANSFERASE; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; SULPIRIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DRUG EFFECTS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CATECHOL O-METHYLTRANSFERASE; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; SULPIRIDE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904106392     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12226     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bilder, R. M., Volavka, J., Lachman, H. M., & Grace, A. A. (2004). The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism: Relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 1943-1961. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300542
2. Durstewitz, D., & Seamans, J. K. (2008). The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase genotypes and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.015
3. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87-107.
4. Foti, D., Weinberg, A., Dien, J., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: Temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 2207-2216. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21182
5. Frank, M. J., D'Lauro, C., & Curran, T. (2007). Cross-task individual differences in error processing: Neural, electrophysiological, and genetic components. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 297-308.
6. Gehring, W. J., Coles, M. G., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1995). A brain potential manifestation of error-related processing [Supplement]. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 261-272.
7. Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2004). Are all medial frontal negativities created equal? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 14-20). Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
8. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychology Review, 109, 679-709.
9. Jocham, G., & Ullsperger, M. (2009). Neuropharmacology of performance monitoring. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.011
10. Krämer, U. M., Cunillera, T., Camara, E., Marco-Pallares, J., Cucurell, D., Nager, W., ... Munte, T. F. (2007). The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase and dopamine D4 receptor genotypes on neurophysiological markers of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 14190-14198. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4229-07.2007
11. Kuroki, T., Meltzer, H. Y., & Ichikawa, J. (1999). Effects of antipsychotic drugs on extracellular dopamine levels in rat medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, 288, 774-781.
12. Lachman, H. M., Papolos, D. F., Saito, T., Yu, Y. M., Szumlanski, C. L., & Weinshilboum, R. M. (1996). Human catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: Description of a functional polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacogenetics, 6, 243-250.
13. Marco-Pallares, J., Cucurell, D., Cunillera, T., Kramer, U. M., Camara, E., Nager, W., ... Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Genetic variability in the dopamine system (dopamine receptor D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) modulates neurophysiological responses to gains and losses. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.01.006
14. Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788-798.
15. Mueller, E. M., Burgdorf, C., Chavanon, M. L., Schweiger, D., Wacker, J., & Stemmler, G. (2013). Dopamine modulates frontomedial failure processing of agentic introverts versus extraverts in incentive contexts. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0228-9
16. Mueller, E. M., Makeig, S., Stemmler, G., Hennig, J., & Wacker, J. (2011). Dopamine effects on human error processing depend on catechol-O-methyltransferase VAL158MET genotype. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15818-15825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2103-11.2011
17. Osinsky, R., Hewig, J., Alexander, N., & Hennig, J. (2012). COMT Val158Met genotype and the common basis of error and conflict monitoring. Brain Research, 1452, 108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.054
18. Reuter, M., & Hennig, J. (2005). Association of the functional catechol-O-methyltransferase VAL158MET polymorphism with the personality trait of extraversion. NeuroReport, 16, 1135-1138. doi: 00001756-200507130-00020
19. Santesso, D. L., Evins, A. E., Frank, M. J., Schetter, E. C., Bogdan, R., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2008). Single dose of a dopamine agonist impairs reinforcement learning in humans: Evidence from event-related potentials and computational modeling of striatal-cortical function. Human Brain Mapping, 3, e2479. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20642
20. Ullsperger, M. (2010). Genetic association studies of performance monitoring and learning from feedback: The role of dopamine and serotonin. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 649-659. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.06.009
21. Ullsperger, M., Fischer, A. G., Nigbur, R., & Endrass, T. (2014). Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.009
22. Vezoli, J., & Procyk, E. (2009). Frontal feedback-related potentials in nonhuman primates: Modulation during learning and under haloperidol. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 15675-15683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4943-09.2009