The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications

Implementation Science

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Ruppertsberg, Alexa I ^a   Ward, Vicky ^b   Ridout, Alicia ^a   Foy, Robbie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Impact plans; Knowledge exchange; Research proposals

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84904080190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, Durieux P, Legare F, Nielson CP, Adily A, Ward JE, Porter C, Shea B, Grimshaw JM: Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Q 2008, 86:125-155.
2. Goering P, Ross S, Jacobson N, Butterill D: Developing a guide to support the knowledge translation component of the grant application process. Evid Policy J Res Debate Pract 2010, 6:91-102.
3. Holmes B, Scarrow G, Schellenberg M: Translating evidence into practice: the role of health research funders. Implement Sci 2012, 7:39.
4. Smith S, Ward V, House A: "Impact" in the proposals for the UK's research excellence framework: shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Res Policy 2011, 40:1369-1379.
5. Ward V, Smith S, Foy R, House A, Hamer S: Planning for knowledge translation: a researcher's guide. Evid Policy 2010, 6:527-541.
6. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research.[ http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/INVOLVEBriefingNotesApr2012.pdf ]
7. RCUK impact requirements.[ http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/impacts/RCUKImpactFAQ.pdf ]
8. Typology of research impact.[ http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/impacts/TypologyofResearchImpacts.pdf ]
9. Ward V, Smith S, House A, Hamer S: Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:297-304.
10. Foy R, Eccles MP: Audit and Feedback Interventions. In Knowledge Translation in Healthcare: Moving From Evidence To Practice. Secondth edition. Edited by Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013:183.
11. Ward V, House A, Hamer S: Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009, 14:156-164.
12. Solberg L, Mosser G, McDonald S: The three faces of performance measurement: improvement, accountability, and research. J Qual Improv 1997, 23:135-147.
13. Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 1999, 54:493-503.
14. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches.[ http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/kt_lm_ktplan-en.pdf ]
15. Patient and public involvement - getting going as a research reviewer.[ http://www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/PPI/Documents/PPI%20A5%20booklet%20low%20res%20FINAL.pdf ]