Contemplating genetic feedback regarding lung cancer susceptibility

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 395-403

  Shepperd, James A ^a   Novell, Corinne A ^a   O'Neill, Suzanne C ^b   Docherty, Sharron L ^c   Sanderson, Saskia C ^d   McBride, Colleen M ^e   Lipkus, Isaac M ^c  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Consistency theory; Expectations; Genes; Lung cancer; Self enhancement theory

Indexed keywords

GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE M1; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; COGNITION; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; COGNITION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC TESTING; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904065447     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9561-z     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information:Will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 89-103.
2. Marteau TM, French DP, Griffin SJ, et al. Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD007275; 2010.
3. Sedikides C, Gregg AP. Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008; 3: 102-116.
4. Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT. Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1986; 50: 899-905.
5. Ditto PH, Lopez DF. Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1992; 63: 568-584.
6. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley; 1958.
7. Swann WB, Griffin JJ, Predmore SC, Gaines B. The cognitive- affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts selfenhancement. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1987; 52: 881-889.
8. Renner B. Biased reasoning: Adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30: 384-396. (Pubitemid 38213832)
9. Steele CM, ed. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. New York: Academic Press; 1998.
10. Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognit Therapy Res. 1992; 16: 143-163.
11. Shedlosky-Shoemaker R, Ngo TL, Ferketich AK, et al. Exploring perceptions of genetic testing: An examination of perceived accuracy over time. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78: 34-39.
12. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1979; 37: 1915-1926.
13. Sobti RC, Kaur P, Kaur S, et al. Combined effect of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms on histological subtypes of lung cancer. Biomarkers. 2008; 13: 282-295.
14. Benhamou S, Lee WJ, Alexandrie AK, et al. Meta- and pooled analyses of the effects of glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and smoking on lung cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2002; 23: 1343-1350.
15. Engel LS, Taioli E, Pfeiffer R, et al. Pooled analysis and metaanalysis of glutathione S-transferase M1 and bladder cancer: A HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 156: 95-109. (Pubitemid 34759966)
16. Slovic P. Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools? In: Slovic P, ed. Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001: 97-124.
17. Hansen W, Malotte C. Perceived personal immunity: The development of beliefs about susceptibility to the consequences of smoking. Preventive Medicine. 1986; 15: 363-372. (Pubitemid 16051426)
18. Slovic P. Affect, analysis, adolescence, and risk. In: Romer D, ed. Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003: 44-48.
19. Reyna V. A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Med Decis Making. 2008; 28: 850-865.
20. McBride CM, Bepler G, Lipkus IM, et al. Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002; 11: 521-528.
21. Sanderson SC, Humphries SE, Hubbart C, et al. Psychological and behavioural impact of genetic testing smokers for lung cancer risk: A phase II exploratory trial. J Health Psychol. 2008; 13: 481-494. (Pubitemid 351537907)
22. Mackinnon A, Jorm AF, Christensen H, et al. A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personal Individ Differ. 1999; 27: 405-416.
23. Spielberger C, Gorssuch R, Lushene P, Vagg P, Jacobs G.Manual for the State-Trait Anixety Inventory, 1983.
24. Zaichkowksy J. The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advert. 1994; 23: 59-70.
25. Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6: 115-134. (Pubitemid 33604034)
26. Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ho K, Ritov I. Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychol Sci. 1997; 8: 423-429.
27. Swann WB Jr. To be adored or to be known? The interplay of selfenhancement and self-verification. In: Sorrentino ETHRM, ed. Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, vol. 2. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 1990: 408-448.
28. Phillips KA, Warner E, Meschino WS, et al. Perceptions of Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients on genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Clin Genet. 2000; 57: 376-383. (Pubitemid 30245824)
29. Shannon KM, Muzikansky A, Chan-Smutko G, Niendorf KB, Ryan PD. Uptake of BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing: In individuals previously tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Genet Med. 2006; 8: 740- 745.
30. Carroll P, Sweeny K, Shepperd JA. Forsaking optimism. Rev Gen Psychol. 2006; 10: 56-73.