European administrative proceedings

Law and Contemporary Problems

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 21-36

  Cassese, Sabino ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904063010     PISSN: 00239186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. With reference to the United Kingdom, see IMPLEMENTING EC LAW IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: STRUCTURES FOR INDIRECT RULE (T. Daintith ed., 1995);
2. J. STEINER, ENFORCING EC LAW (1995). With reference to Spain
3. S. GALERA RODRIGO, LA APLICACIÓN ADMINISTRATIVA DEL DERECHO COMUNITARIO. ADMINISTRACIÓN MIXTA: TERCÉRA VIA DE APLICACIÓN (1998).
4. E. CHITI ET AL., L'INTEGRAZIONE AMMINISTRATIVA EUROPEA (2003).
5. H. Kassim, The European Administration: Between Europeanization and Domestication, in GOVERNING EUROPE (J. Hayward et al. eds., 2003);
6. D.J. Elazar, The United States and the European Union, in THE FEDERAL VISION 31 (C. Nicolaidis et al. eds., 2001).
7. O. Costa & P. Magnette, The European Union as a Consociation? A Methodological Assessment, 26 W. EUR. POL. 1, n..3 (2003).
8. On this feature of the early phase of European integration, see M. Patrono, IL GOVERNO DELLA PRIMA EUROPA 29 (2003).
9. M. P. Chiti, The EC Notion of Public Administration: the Case of the Bodies Governed by Public Law, in 8 EUR. PUB. L. 473, n.4 (2002);
10. S. Cassese, La nozione comunitaria di pubblica amministrazione, in GIORNALE DI DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO 920 n.10 (1996).
11. The literature on this topic is vast. Among the recent studies are, EU COMMITTEES: SOCIAL REGULATION, LAW AND POLITICS (C. Joerges et al. eds., 1999);
12. K. Lenaerts et al., Towards a Legal Framework for Executive Rule-Making in the EU? The Contribution of the New Comitology Decision, 37 COMMON MKT. L. REV. 645 (2000);
13. M. Egeberg et al., The Many Faces of EU Committee Governance, 26 W. EUR. POL. 19, n.3 (2003).
14. There are still few studies of the European administrative proceeding. The best analysis and typology is G. della Cananea, L'amministrazione europea, in TRATTATO DI DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO, DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO 1877 (S. Cassese ed., 2d ed. 2003). On the European administrative proceeding
15. J. SCHWARZE, EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 1173 (1992);
16. M.P. CHITI, DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO EUROPEO 301 (1999) (see also the second edition in Spanish of M.P. CHITI, DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO EUROPEO 237 (2d ed. 2002).
17. Similar observations in K. Michelet, La Charte de droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne et la procédure administrative non contentieuse, in ACTUALITE JURIDIQUE-DROIT ADMINISTRATIF 949 (2002). On the compatibility of the Spanish law on the administrative proceeding, No. 30 of 1992, with Community law
18. A. GARCÍA URETA, PROCEDIMIENTO ADMINISTRATIVO Y DERECHO COMUNITARIO (2002).
19. H. P. NEHL, PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE IN EC LAW 7 (1999).
20. This aspect is usually neglected by the studies of Community law. But see J.H.H. WEILER, THE CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE 98-99 (1999) (on infranationalism);
21. J.H.H. Weiler, La Comitologia: infranazionalismo, costituzionalismo e democrazia, in LA COSTITUZIONE DELL'EUROPA 597 (2003);
22. H. Siedentopf et al., The European Administrative Space From a German Administrative Science Perspective, in 69 INT'L REV. OF ADMIN. SCI. 9 (2003);
23. F. Bignami, The Challenge of Cooperative Regulatory Relations after Enlargement, in LAW AND GOVERNANCE IN AN ENLARGED EUROPEAN UNION 97 (George A. Bermann & Katharina Pistor eds., 2004) (unpublished manuscript, on file with the author).
24. D. Costa in Conseil d'Etat, 29 juillet 2002, n. 232829, in ACTUALITÉ JURIDIQUE - DROIT ADMINISTRATIF 1395 (December 9, 2002). See also C. Hilson, The Europeanization of English Administrative Law: Judicial Review and Convergence, in 9 EUR. PUB. L. 125 n.1 (2003).