Estimation of the global impacts of aviation-related noise using an income-based approach

Transport Policy

Volumn 34, Issue , 2014, Pages 85-101

  He, Qinxian ^a   Wollersheim, Christoph ^b   Locke, Maryalice ^c   Waitz, Ian ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON   (United States)

^c FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Aircraft noise; Aviation noise impacts; Cost benefit analysis; Hedonic pricing; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ABATEMENT COST; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; INCOME; NOISE POLLUTION; POLLUTION POLICY; PRICING POLICY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 84904062741     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barde J.P., Pearce D.W. Valuing the Environment: Six Case Studies 1991, Earthscan Publications, London.
2. Bateman I., et al. The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study: Report submitted to the Scottish Executive Development Department, Edinburgh 2001.
3. Chalermpong, S., 2010. Airport Noise Impact on Property Values: Case of Bangkok Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Thailand. Transport Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 10-14, 2010.
4. Dekkers J.E.C., van der Straaten J.W. Monetary valuation of aircraft noise: a hedonic analysis around Amsterdam airport. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2850-2858.
5. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8:45-64.
6. Envalue, 2007. Environmental Valuation Database. NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change. [online]. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/envalue.
7. EPA Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety: EPA Report No. 550/9-74-004 1974, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Washington, DC.
8. EPA Guidelines for Performing Economic Analyses: EPA Report No. 240/R-00-003 2000, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Washington, DC.
9. FAA Order 1050.1E,CHG 1 - Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures 2006, US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
10. FAA, 2009a. Environmental Tools Suite Frequently Asked Questions. US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. [online]. (accessed 24.03.10). http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/research/models/toolsfaq/?
11. FAA FAA Aerospace Forecast, Fiscal Years 2009-2025 2009, US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
12. GAO Results From a Survey of the Nation[U+05F3]s 50 Busiest Commercial Service Airports, GAO/RCED-00-222 2000, United States General Accounting Office.
13. Goossens Y., et al. Alternative Progress Indicators to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) As a Means Towards Sustainable Development. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy 2007, European Parliament.
14. Hanley N., Shogren J., White B. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. He Q. Development of an Income-Based Hedonic Monetization Model for the Assessment of Aviation-Related Noise Impacts (SM thesis) 2010, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
16. Hökby, S., Söderqvist, T., 2001. Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden. In: Proceedings of 11th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Southampton, UK, June 28-30, 2001.
17. ICF International, 2008. Residential Real Estate Model.
18. Japan International Cooperation Agency, 2003. Country Profile Study on Poverty: Saudi Arabia. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Planning and Evaluation Department.
19. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics 2003, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 5th ed.
20. Kish C. An Estimate of the Global Impact of Commercial Aviation Noise (SM thesis) 2008, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
21. Kriström B., Riera P. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1996, 7:45-55.
22. Lahmeyer, J., 2004. Algeria: General Data of the Country [online]. 〈〉. accessed 04.08.2009. http://www.populstat.info/Africa/algeriag.htm.
23. Mahashabde A. Assessing Environmental Benefits and Economic Costs of Aviation Environmental Policy Measures (Ph.D. thesis) 2009, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
24. Mahashabde A., et al. Assessing the environmental impacts of aircraft noise and emissions. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2011, 47:15-52.
25. McGuire, S., 2009. Sleep Disturbance Due to Aircraft Noise. Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction (PARTNER), Project 25.
26. Metz B., et al. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Miedema H.M.E., Oudshoorn C.G.M. Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109(4):409-416.
28. Navrud, S., 2002. The State-of-the-Art on Economic Valuation of Noise: Final Report to the European Commission DG Environment, April 14th 2002.
29. Navrud S. Value transfer and environmental policy. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005: A Survey of Current Issues 2004, 189-217. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northampton, MA, (Chapter 5). T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer (Eds.).
30. Nelson J.P. Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values: problems and prospects. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2004, 38(1):1-28.
31. Nelson J.P., Kennedy P.E. The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 42:345-377.
32. Nelson, J.P., Palmquist, R.B., 2008. Review of APMT Benefit Valuation Methods and Suggestions for Modifications. Prepared for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Draft version, October 2008.
33. Pearce D.W., Markandya A. Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation 1989, OECD, Paris.
34. Rosenberger R.S., Loomis J.B. Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: in-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36(4):1097-1107.
35. Rosenberger R.S., Stanley T.D. Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60:372-378.
36. Schäfer, A., Waitz, I., 2014 Air transportation and the environment. Transp. Policy, in this issue, 〈〉. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.012.
37. Schäfer A., Victor D.G. The future mobility of the world population. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2000, 34(3):171-205.
38. Schipper Y. Environmental costs in European aviation. Transp. Policy 2004, 11:141-154.
39. Schipper Y., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. Why do aircraft noise value estimates differ? A meta-analysis. J. Air Transp. Manage. 1998, 4:117-124.
40. Stanley T.D. Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. J. Econ. Perspect. 2001, 15(3):131-150.
41. Stanley T.D., Jarrell S.B. Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys. J. Econ. Surv. 1989, 3(2):161-170.
42. Swift, H., 2009. A Review of the Literature Related to Potential Health Effects of Aircraft Noise. Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction (PARTNER), Project 19.
43. Tam, R., et al., 2007. Assessment of Silent Aircraft-Enabled Regional Development and Airline Economics in the UK. In: Proceedings of 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 8-11, 2007.
44. United Nations, 2010. Composition of Macro Geographical (Continental) Regions, Geographical Sub-Regions, and Selected Economic and Other Groupings. United Nations Statistics Division. [online]. (accessed 05.04.10). http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.
45. US BEA. Local Area Personal Income. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis. [online]. (accessed 15.06.10). http://www.bea.gov/.
46. Wadud, Z., 2009. A Systematic Review of Literature on the Valuation of Local Environmental Externalities of Aviation. Omega - Aviation in a Sustainable World. Cambridge, UK.
47. Waitz, I., et al., 2004. Aviation and the Environment: A National Vision Statement, Framework for Goals and Recommended Actions. Report to the United States Congress.
48. Walters A.A. Noise and Prices 1975, Oxford University Press, London.
49. World Bank, 2010. GNI Per Capita, PPP. The World Bank Group. [online]. (accessed 26.03.10). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.KD.
50. Wolfe, P.J., et al. Near-airport distribution of the environmental costs of aviation. Transp. Policy, in this issue, 〈〉. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.023.