An empirical look at trade secret law’s shift from common to statutory law

Intellectual Property and the Common Law

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 151-176

  Risch, Michael ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904060778     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013550.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. Sarah Gettings, Note, Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski: Frustrating Uniformity in Trade Secret Law, 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 423 (2007).
2. Linda B. Samuels & Bryan K. Johnson, The Uniform Trade Secrets: The States’ Response, 24 Creighton L. Rev. 49, 91–92 (1990).
3. Michael Risch, Essay, A Failure of Uniform Laws?, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 1 (2010), available at http://www.pennumbra.com/essays/10-2010/Risch.pdf.
4. Sharon K. Sandeen, The Evolution of Trade Secret Law and Why Courts Commit Error When They Do Not Follow the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, 33 Hamline L. Rev. 493 (2010).
5. Catherine Fisk, Working Knowledge: Trade Secrets, Restrictive Covenants in Employment, and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 1800–1920, 52 Hastings L.J. 441 (2001).
6. Robert G. Bone, A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification, 86 Cal. L. Rev. 241, 259–60 (1998).
7. Pamela Samuelson, Information as Property: Do Ruckelshaus and Carpenter Signal a Changing Direction in Intellectual Property Law?, 38 Cath. U. L. Rev. 365, 396 (1989).
8. David S. Almeling et al., A Statistical Analysis of Trade Secret Litigation in State Courts, 46 Gonz. L. Rev. 57, 62–63 (2011)
9. Adam B. Jaffe, et al., Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations, 108 Q. J. Econ. 577 (1993).