Corrigendum to Atmospheric predictability: Why butterflies are not of practical importance [J. Atmos. Sci., 71, (2014) 2476-2488] DOI:10.1175/JAS-D-14-0007.1;Atmospheric predictability: Why butterflies are not of practical importance

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 2476-2488

  Durran, Dale R ^a   Gingrich, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; STORMS; TURBULENCE MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC PREDICTABILITY; DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTIONS; ENSEMBLE PERTURBATION; INITIAL PERTURBATION; MESOSCALE MODEL SIMULATION; PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE; QUASIGEOSTROPHIC DYNAMICS; SPECTRAL TURBULENCES;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; KINETIC ENERGY; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; MODEL TEST; PREDICTION; QUASI-GEOSTROPHIC FLOW; STORM; TURBULENCE; WEATHER FORECASTING;

PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84903881705     PISSN: 00224928     EISSN: 15200469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0377.1     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Anthes, R.A., Y. Kuo,D. P. Baumhefner, R.M. Errico, and T.W. Bettge, 1985: Prediction of mesoscale atmospheric motions. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 28B, Academic Press, 159-202.
2. Bei, N., and F. Zhang, 2007: Impacts of initial condition errors on mesoscale predictability of heavy precipitation along the Mei- Yu front of China. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 83-99, doi:10.1002/qj.20.
3. Durran, D. R., P. A. Reinecke, and J. D. Doyle, 2013: Large-scale errors and mesoscale predictability in Pacific Northwest snowstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1470-1487, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0202.1.
4. Errico, R. M., 1985: Spectra computed from a limited area grid. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113, 1554-1562, doi:10.1175/ 1520-0493(1985)113<1554:SCFALA>2.0.CO;2.
5. Gingrich, M., 2013: Mesoscale predictability and error growth in short range ensemble forecasts. M.S. thesis. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, 70 pp.
6. Gkioulekas, E., and K. K. Tung, 2007: A new proof on net upscale energy cascade in two-dimensional and quasi-geostrophic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 576, 173-180, doi:10.1017/ S0022112006003934.
7. Hakim, G. J., 2005: Vertical structure of midlatitude analysis and forecast errors. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 567-578, doi:10.1175/ MWR-2882.1.
8. Held, I. M., R. T. Pierrehumbert, S. T. Garner, and K. L. Swanson, 1995: Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics. J. Fluid Mech., 282, 1-20, doi:10.1017/S0022112095000012.
9. Hodur, R. M., 1997: The Naval Research Laboratory's Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1414-1430, doi:10.1175/ 1520-0493(1997)125,1414:TNRLSC>2.0.CO;2.
10. Hohenegger, C., and C. Schär, 2007: Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud-resolving scales. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1783-1793, doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1783.
11. Leith, C., 1971: Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 145-161, doi:10.1175/ 1520-0469(1971)028<0145:APATDT>2.0.CO;2.
12. Leith, C., and R. Kraichnan, 1972: Predictability of turbulent flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1041-1058, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1041: POTF>2.0.CO;2.
13. Lindborg, E., 1999: Can the atmospheric kinetic energy spectrum be explained by two-dimensional turbulence? J. Fluid Mech., 388, 259-288, doi:10.1017/S0022112099004851.
14. Lorenz, E., 1969: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289-307, doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x.
15. Mapes, B., S. Tulich, T. Nasuno, and M. Satoh, 2008: Predictability aspects of global aqua-planet simulations with explicit convection. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 86A, 175-185.
16. Métais, O., and M. Lesieur, 1986: Statistical predictability of decaying turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 857-870, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0857:SPODT>2.0.CO;2.
17. Nastrom, G., and K. Gage, 1985: A climatology of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 950-960, doi:10.1175/ 1520-0469(1985)042<0950:ACOAWS>2.0.CO;2.
18. Nuss, W., and D. Miller, 2001: Mesoscale predictability under various synoptic regimes. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 8, 429-438, doi:10.5194/npg-8-429-2001.
19. Reinecke, P. A., and D. R. Durran, 2009: Initial-condition sensitivities and the predictability of downslope winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3401-3418, doi:10.1175/2009JAS3023.1.
20. Rotunno, R., and C. Snyder, 2008: A generalization of Lorenz's model for the predictability of flowswithmany scales ofmotion. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1063-1076, doi:10.1175/2007JAS2449.1.
21. Skamarock,W. C., 2004: Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 3019-3024, doi:10.1175/MWR2830.1.
22. Tribbia, J., and D. Baumhefner, 2004: Scale interactions and atmospheric predictability: An updated perspective. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 703-713, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0703: SIAAPA>2.0.CO;2.
23. Weisman, M., C. Davis, W. Wang, K. Manning, and J. Klemp, 2008: Experiences with 036-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARWmodel. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 407-437, doi:10.1175/ 2007WAF2007005.1.