Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 578, Issue , 2014, Pages 75-79

  Bocci, Tommaso ^a,b   Vannini, Beatrice ^a   Torzini, Antonio ^a,b   Mazzatenta, Andrea ^a,d   Vergari, Maurizio ^c   Cogiamanian, Filippo ^c   Priori, Alberto ^c   Sartucci, Ferdinando ^a,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SIENA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d CNR   (Italy)

^e CISANELLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Motor system; Motor unit number estimation; Motor unit recruitment; Motorneuron excitability; Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; TsDCS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; MOTOR UNIT; MOTOR UNIT NUMBER ESTIMATION; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECRUITMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; THORACIC SPINAL CORD; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCUTANEOUS SPINAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ULNAR NERVE; CERVICAL SPINE; ELECTRODE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPINAL CORD; TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION; VERTEBRA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RECRUITMENT, NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL; SPINAL CORD; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRIC NERVE STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903845169     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.037     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aguilar J., Humanes-Valera D., Alonso-Calvino E., Yague J.G., Moxon K.A., Oliviero A., Foffani G. Spinal cord injury immediately changes the state of the brain. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:7528-7537.
2. Aguilar J., Pulecchi F., Dilena R., Oliviero A., Priori A., Foffani G. Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats. J. Physiol. 2011, 589:4981-4996.
3. Ahmed Z. Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multijoint movements. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:14949-14957.
4. Ahmed Z. Electrophysiological characterization of spino-sciatic and cortico-sciatic associative plasticity: modulation by trans-spinal direct current and effects on recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:4935-4946.
5. Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation alters muscle tone in mice with and without spinal cord injury with spasticity. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:1701-1709.
6. Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulates motor cortex-induced muscle contraction in mice. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2011, 110:1414-1424.
7. Ahmed Z., Wieraszko A. Trans-spinal direct current enhances corticospinal output and stimulation-evoked release of glutamate analog, d-2,3-(3)H-aspartic acid. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2012, 112:1576-1592.
8. Alanis J. Effects of direct current on motor neurones. J. Physiol. 1953, 120:569-578.
9. Ardolino G., Bossi B., Barbieri S., Priori A. Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. J. Physiol. 2005, 568:653-663.
10. Bhadra N., Kilgore K.L. Direct current electrical conduction block of peripheral nerve. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2004, 12:313-324.
11. Cogiamanian F., Ardolino G., Vergari M., Ferrucci R., Ciocca M., Scelzo E., Barbieri S., Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3:63.
12. Cogiamanian F., Vergari M., Pulecchi F., Marceglia S., Priori A. Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:2636-2640.
13. Cogiamanian F., Vergari M., Schiaffi E., Marceglia S., Ardolino G., Barbieri S., Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings. Pain 2011, 152:370-375.
14. Daube J.R. Estimating the number of motor units in a muscle. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 12:585-594.
15. Daube J.R. Motor unit number estimates-from A to Z. J. Neurol. Sci. 2006, 242:23-35.
16. David W.S., Goyal N., Henry F.P., Baldassari L.E., Redmond R.W. Validation of an incremental motor unit number estimation technique in rabbits. Muscle Nerve 2010, 41:794-799.
17. Eccles J.C., Kostyuk P.G., Schmidt R.F. The effect of electric polarization of the spinal cord on central afferent fibres and on their excitatory synaptic action. J. Physiol. 1962, 162:138-150.
18. Foffani G., Humanes-Valera D., Calderon-Munoz F., Oliviero A., Aguilar J. Spinal cord injury immediately decreases anesthetic requirements in rats. Spinal Cord 2011, 49:822-826.
19. Fuentes R., Petersson P., Nicolelis M.A. Restoration of locomotive function in Parkinson's disease by spinal cord stimulation: mechanistic approach. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 32:1100-1108.
20. Fuentes R., Petersson P., Siesser W.B., Caron M.G., Nicolelis M.A. Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Science 2009, 323:1578-1582.
21. Hubli M., Dietz V., Schrafl-Altermatt M., Bolliger M. Modulation of spinal neuronal excitability by spinal direct currents and locomotion after spinal cord injury. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124:1187-1195.
22. Lamy J.C., Boakye M. Seeking significance of transcutaneous spinal DC stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124:1049-1050.
23. Lamy J.C., Ho C., Badel A., Arrigo R.T., Boakye M. Modulation of soleus H reflex by spinal DC stimulation in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:906-914.
24. Leis A.A., Ross M.A., Emori T., Matsue Y., Saito T. The silent period produced by electrical stimulation of mixed peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve 1991, 14:1202-1208.
25. Liebetanz D., Koch R., Mayenfels S., Konig F., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:1161-1167.
26. Lim C.Y., Shin H.I. Noninvasive DC stimulation on neck changes MEP. NeuroReport 2011, 22:819-823.
27. McCreery D.B., Agnew W.F., Yuen T.G., Bullara L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37:996-1001.
28. McLellan D.L. The electromyographic silent period produced by supramaximal electrical stimulation in normal man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1973, 36:334-341.
29. Rango M., Cogiamanian F., Marceglia S., Barberis B., Arighi A., Biondetti P., Priori A. Myoinositol content in the human brain is modified by transcranial direct current stimulation in a matter of minutes: a 1H-MRS study. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 60:782-789.
30. Rizzo V., Crupi D., Bagnato S., Quartarone A., Benvenga S., Bartolone L., Ghilardi M.F., Trimarchi F., Girlanda P., Battaglia F. Neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in adult hypothyroidism and effect of replacement treatment. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 266:38-43.
31. Sartucci F., Moscato G., Rossi C., Caleo M., Bocci T., Murri L., Giannini F., Rossi A. Macro-EMG and MUNE changes in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: one-year follow up. Int. J. Neurosci. 2011, 121:257-266.
32. Schlaier J.R., Eichhammer P., Langguth B., Doenitz C., Binder H., Hajak G., Brawanski A. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on cortical excitability in patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a pilot study. Eur. J. Pain 2007, 11:863-868.
33. Shefner J.M., Logigian E.L. The mixed nerve silent period in normal subjects and patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 38:505-510.
34. Shefner J.M., Watson M.L., Simionescu L., Caress J.B., Burns T.M., Maragakis N.J., Benatar M., David W.S., Sharma K.R., Rutkove S.B. Multipoint incremental motor unit number estimation as an outcome measure in ALS. Neurology 2011, 77:235-241.
35. Truini A., Vergari M., Biasiotta A., La Cesa S., Gabriele M., Di Stefano G., Cambieri C., Cruccu G., Inghilleri M., Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation inhibits nociceptive spinal pathway conduction and increases pain tolerance in humans. Eur. J. Pain 2011, 15:1023-1027.
36. Wang F.C., de Pasqua V., Delwaide P.J. Age-related changes in fastest and slowest conducting axons of thenar motor units. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22:1022-1029.
37. Wang F.C., Delwaide P.J. Number and relative size of thenar motor units estimated by an adapted multiple point stimulation method. Muscle Nerve 1995, 18:969-979.
38. Wang F.C., Delwaide P.J. Number and relative size of thenar motor units in ALS patients: application of the adapted multiple point stimulation method. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 109:36-43.
39. Winkler T., Hering P., Straube A. Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121:957-961.