Risk metrics: Interpretation and choice

IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1914-1918

  Johansen, I L ^a   Rausand, M ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

decision context; evaluation criteria; Risk metrics; stakeholders

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; RISK ANALYSIS;

DECISION CONTEXT; EVALUATION CRITERIA; FURTHER WORKS; RISK METRICS; STAKEHOLDERS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 84903829590     PISSN: 21573611     EISSN: 2157362X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2012.6838079     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. NRC, Understanding Risk. Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1996
2. S. N. Jonkmann, P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder, and J. K. Vrijling An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage, Journal of Hazardous materials, vol. A99, pp. 1-30, 2003
3. M. Rausand, Risk Assessment; Theory, Methods, and Applications, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011
4. NORSOK Z-013. Risk and Emergency Preparedness Analysis (English version). Standard Norge, Oslo, 2001
5. S. Kaplan and J. Garrick On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 407-417, 1981
6. HSE, The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations, HMSO, London, 1992
7. D. Ball and P. Floyd, Societal Risk, Health and Safety Executive, London, 1998
8. I. L. Hirst and D. A Carter, A worst case methodology for obtaining a rough but rapid indication of the societal risk from a major accident hazard installation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. A92, pp. 223-237
9. J. K. Vrijling, W. van Hengel, R. J. Houben, A framework for risk evaluation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 43, pp. 245-261 (1995)
10. EMS, LUL QRA-London Underground Limited Quantified Risk Assessment, Safety Quality and Environmental Department of London Underground, 2001
11. OLF, Metode for Miljrettet Risikoanalyse (In Norwegian), DNV, Hvik, 2007
12. R. E. Jorissen and P. J. M. Stallen, Quantified Societal Risk and Policy Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996
13. NUREG/CR-6813, Issues and Recommendations for Advancement of PRA Technology in Risk-informed Decision making, U. S. Nuclear Regularity Commission, Washington, DC, 2003
14. Y. Y. Haimes, Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004
15. H. Bohnenblust and P. Slovic, Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk-based decision making, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 59, pp. 151-159
16. B. S. Blanchard, System Engineering Management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004
17. R. Rosness, A contingency model of decision-making involving risk of accidental loss, Safety Science, vol. 47, pp. 807-812, 2009
18. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society, Safety Science, vol. 27, pp. 183-213, 1997
19. I. L. Johansen, The effect of the Deepwater Horizon accident on the Norwegian debate concerning future oil and gas development in Lofoten and Vesterlen, in Advances in safety, reliability, and risk management, ESREL 2011, Taylor and Francis, London, 2011