Calibration plots for risk prediction models in the presence of competing risks

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 3191-3203

  Gerds, Thomas A ^a   Andersen, Per K ^a   Kattan, Michael W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration plots; Competing risks; Kernel smoothing; Pseudo values; Risk models

Indexed keywords

CYCLOSPORIN A; PLACEBO;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH; COMPETING RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; JACKKNIFE TEST; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PREDICTION; PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; RISK; RISK PREDICTION MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL; BIOSTATISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIVER CIRRHOSIS, BILIARY; MORTALITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VALIDATION STUDY;

BIOSTATISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; LIVER CIRRHOSIS, BILIARY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84903821408     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6152     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersen PK, Klein JP, Rosthøj S. Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models. Biometrika 2003;90(1):15-27.
2. Aalen O, Johansen S. An empirical transition matrix for non-homogeneous Markov chains based on censored observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1978;5: 141-150.
3. Andersen PK, Perme MP. Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2010;19: 71-99.
4. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, California, 1984.
5. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley: New York, 1989.
6. LeCessie S, VanHouwelingen JC. A goodness-of-fit test for binary regression models, based on smoothing methods. Biometrics 1991;47: 1267-1282.
7. Yang SS. Linear functions of concomitants of order statistics with application to nonparametric estimation of a regression function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1981;76: 658-662.
8. Dabrowska DM. Uniform consistency of the kernel conditional Kaplan-Meier estimate. Annals of Statistics 1989;17: 1157-1167.
9. Akritas MG. Nearest neighbor estimation of a bivariate distribution under random censoring. The Annals of Statistics 1994;22: 1299-1327.
10. Graw F, Gerds TA, Schumacher M. On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models. Lifetime Data Analysis 2009;15(2):241-255.
11. Binder N, Gerds TA, Andersen P. Pseudo-observations for competing risks with covariate dependent censoring. Lifetime Data Analysis 2013. :Epub ahead of print.
12. vander Vaart A. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
13. Silverman B. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall: London, 1986.
14. Sheather SJ, Jones MC. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 1991;53(3):683-690.
15. Wand M. Kernsmooth: functions for kernel smoothing for Wand & Jones (1995), 2013. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=KernSmooth R package version 2.23-10.
16. Wand MMP, Jones MC. Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall: London, 1995.
17. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997;92(438):548-560.
18. Mogensen UB, Ishwaran H, Gerds TA. Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. Journal of Statistical Software 2012;50: 1-23.
19. Gerds TA, Kattan MW, Schumacher M, Yu C. Estimating a time-dependent concordance index for survival prediction models with covariate dependent censoring. Statistics in Medicine 2013;32(13):2173-2184.
20. Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JCM, Gerds T. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks, Technical Report Technical Report 3, University of Copenhagen, Department of Biostatistics, 2013.
21. Saha P, Heagerty PJ. Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 2010;66: 999-1011.
22. Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Statistics in Medicine 2006;25: 1978-9.
23. Lombard M, Portmann B, Neuberger J, Williams R, Tygstrup N, Ranek L, Ring-Larsen H, Rodes J, Navasa M, Trepo C, Pape G, Schou G, Badsberg JH, Andersen PK. Cyclosporin A treatment in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a long-term placebo controlled trial. Gastroenterology 1993;104(2):519-526.
24. Andersen PK, Skovgaard LT. Regression with Linear Predictors. Springer Verlag: New York, 2010.
25. Fine J, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999;94(446):496-509.
26. Kattan MW, Giri D, Panageas KS, Hummer A, Cranor M, VanZee KJ, Hudis CA, Norton L, Borgen PI, Tan LK. A tool for predicting breast carcinoma mortality in women who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2004;101(11):2509-2515.
27. Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JC, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology 2009;20: 555-561.
28. Gerds TA, Cai T, Schumacher M. The performance of risk prediction models. Biometrical Journal 2008;50(4):457-479.
29. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. Springer: New York, 2009.
30. Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer Verlag: New York, 2001.