Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) in a three-month observational study

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 112-119

  Pilkonis, Paul A ^a   Yu, Lan ^a   Dodds, Nathan E ^a   Johnston, Kelly L ^a   Maihoefer, Catherine C ^a   Lawrence, Suzanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Depression; Item response theory; Measurement; Patient reported outcomes; Self report

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DEPRESSION; EMOTIONAL STRESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PAIN; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FOLLOW UP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALIBRATION; COMPUTERS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903795442     PISSN: 00223956     EISSN: 18791379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beck A.T., Ward C.H., Mendelson M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961, 4:561-571.
2. Buysse D.J., Yu L., Moul D.E., Germain A., Stover A., Dodds N.E., et al. Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measure for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep 2010, 33:781-792.
3. Cella D., Gershon R., Lai J.S., Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 2007, 16:133-144.
4. ®) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported outcome item banks: 2005-2008. JClin Epidemiol 2010, 63:1179-1194.
5. ®): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007, 45:S3-S11.
6. ® stone analysis report: a Rosetta stone for Patient Reported Outcomes 2012, Vol. 1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
7. Choi S.W., Podrabsky T., McKinney N., Schalet B.D., Cook K.F., Cella D. PROsetta stone analysis report: a Rosetta stone for Patient Reported Outcomes: PROMIS depression and CES-D 2013, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Retrieved from. http://www.prosettastone.org/LinkingTables/Documents/PROMIS%20Depression%20and%20CES-D%20Full%20Report.pdf.
8. Choi S.W., Podrabsky T., McKinney N., Schalet B.D., Cook K.F., Cella D. PROsetta stone analysis report: a Rosetta stone for Patient Reported Outcomes: PROMIS depression and PHQ-9 2013, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Retrieved from. http://www.prosettastone.org/LinkingTables/Documents/PROMIS%20Depression%20and%20PHQ-9%20Full%20Report.pdf.
9. Choi S.W., Reise S.P., Pilkonis P.A., Hays R.D., Cella D. Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:125-136.
10. Crawford J., Cayley C., Lovibond P.F., Wilson P.H., Hartley C. Percentile norms and accompanying interval estimates from an Australian general adult population sample for self-report mood scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES-D, DASS, DASS-21, STAI-X, STAI-Y, SRDS, and SRAS). Aust Psychol 2011, 46:3-14.
11. Fries J.F., Cella D., Rose M., Krishnan E., Bruce B. Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. JRheumatol 2009, 36:2061-2066.
12. Fries J.F., Witter J., Rose M., Cella D., Khanna D., Morgan-Dewitt E. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of Physical Function. JRheumatol 2014, 41:153-158.
13. ® depression measures. Qual Life Res 2011, 20:1349-1357.
14. Hamilton M. Arating scale for depression. JNeurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960, 23.
15. ® for addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011, 119:229-234.
16. Jacobson N.S., Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. JConsult Clin Psychol 1991, 59:12-19.
17. Kocalevent R.D., Hinz A., Brahler E. Standardization of the depression screener patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013, 35:551-555.
18. Narrow W.E., Clarke D.E., Kuramoto S.J., Kraemer H.C., Kupfer D.J., Greiner L., et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: development and reliability of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry 2013, 170:71-82.
19. Olino T.M., Yu L., McMakin D.L., Forbes E.E., Seeley J.R., Lewinsohn P.M., et al. Comparisons across depression assessment instruments in adolescence and young adulthood: an item response theory study using two linking methods. JAbnorm Child Psychol 2013, 1:1267-1277.
20. ®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment 2011, 18:263-283.
21. Radloff L.S. Aself-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1:385-401.
22. ®). Med Care 2007, 45:S22-S31.
23. ® pain behavior item bank. Pain 2009, 146:158-169.
24. Spitzer R., Kroenke K., Williams J. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. JAm Med Assoc 1999, 282:1737-1744.
25. World Health Organization Constitution of the World Health Organization: Basic documents 2007, Author, Geneva. 46th ed.