Mining the human genome after association for molecular pathology v. Myriad genetics

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 504-509

  Evans, Barbara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics; CLIA; Data sharing; Gene patents; Genetic databases; HIPAA; Innovation policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETITION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MEDICAL GENETICS; MINING; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; PATENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WASTE; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA MINING; ETHICS; GENETICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; PRIVACY; UNITED STATES;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA MINING; GENOME, HUMAN; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY, MOLECULAR; PRIVACY; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84903784644     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.186     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 133 S.Ct. 2107 (2013).
2. U.S. Department of Commerce, US Patent and Trademark Office. Utility Examination Guidelines. Fed Regist 2001;66:1092-1099.
3. National Research Council. Sharing publication-related data and materials: responsibility of authorship in the life sciences. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2003.
4. The American Heritage Science Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA, 2005.
5. Bastida AE. The perennial questions of ownership, mineral rights and land rights: from principles to practice. In: International Mining and Oil & Gas Law, Development, and Investment. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation: Denver, CO, 2013 (Mining Section Paper 7A).
6. Evans BJ. Much ado about data ownership. Harvard J Law Technol 2011;25:69- 130.
7. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. Oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf (undated). http://www.boem.gov/uploadedFiles/BOEM/Oil-and-Gas- Energy-Program/Leasing/5BOEMRE-Leasing101.pdf.Accessed2July2013.
8. Cook-Deegan R, Conley JM, Evans JP, Vorhaus D. The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? Eur J Hum Genet 2013;21: 585-588.
9. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. What is the EITI? http://eiti.org/eiti.Accessed2July2013.
10. World Health Organization. Health through safe drinking water and basic sanitation, 2013. http://www.who.int/water-sanitation-health/mdg1/en/. Accessed2July2013.
11. Langreth R, Pettypiece S. Myriad gene patent ruling triggers race for cancer tests. Bloomberg, 14 June 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013- 06-14/myriad-gene-patent-ruling-triggers-race-for-cancer-tests.html. Accessed1July2013.
12. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press: New York, 1990.
13. Reichman JH, Uhlir PF. A contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law Contemp Probl 2003;66-SPG:315-462.
14. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 18, 26, 29, 42 USC); see regulations at 45 CFR pts. 160, 164.
15. Platt R, Carnahan RM, Brown JS, et al. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel program: status and direction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(suppl 1):1-8.
16. Kaffine DT, Costello CJ. Unitization of spatially connected renewable resources (NBER working paper no. 16338). National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, 2010.
17. Roe MJ. Backlash. Columbia Law Rev 1998;98:217-241.
18. Marshall JH, Meyers NL. Legal planning of petroleum production. Yale Law J 1931;41:33-68.
19. Weaver JL. The tragedy of the commons from Spindletop to Enron. J Land Res Environ Law 2004;24:187-193.
20. Free the Data. http://www.free-the-data.org.Accessed24August2013.
21. Rai AK. Patent validity across the Executive Branch: ex ante foundations for policy development. Duke Law J 2012;61:1237-1281.
22. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-578, 102 Stat. 2903, codified as amended at 42 USC 263a; see regulations at 42 CFR pt. 493.
23. Salamon LM. The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction. In: Salamon LM, ed. The Tools of Government. Oxford University Press: New York, 2002.
24. Spulber DF, Yoo CS. Mandating access to telecom and the internet: the hidden side of Trinko. Columbia Law Rev 2007;107:1822-1907.
25. Gómez-Ibáñez JA. Regulating infrastructure. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2003.
26. Chen J. The nature of the public utility: infrastructure, the market, and the law. Northwestern Univ Law Rev 2004;98:1617-1708.
27. Klingebiel D, Ruster J. Why infrastructure financing facilities often fall short of their objectives (World Bank policy research working paper no. 2358). World Bank Group: Washington, DC, 2000.
28. Kysar DA. Law, environment, and vision. Northwestern Univ Law Rev 2003;97:675-729.
29. Hughes H. Enabling investment in environmental sustainability. Indiana Law J 2010;85:597-651.
30. Pub. L. 111-5, Div. A, Title XIII, Div. B, Title IV, 123 Stat. 226, 467 (17 February 2009).
31. 42 USC 17935(d)(1).
32. 42 USC 17935(d)(2).
33. 45 CFR 164.512(i).
34. Phillips CF. The regulation of public utilities, 3rd edn. Public Utilities Reports: Arlington, VA, 1993.
35. Chicago Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Railroad and Warehouse Commission, 134 U.S. 418, 458 (1890).
36. Bluefield Water Works & Imp. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U.S. 679, 692-693 (1923).
37. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco, 417 U.S. 380, 391-392 (1974).
38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office for Civil Rights. Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules. Fed Regist 2013;78:5566-5702.
39. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, 132 S.Ct. 1289 (2012).
40. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office for Civil Rights. Health Information Privacy, Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/ privacy/hipaa/faq/right-to-request-a-restriction/512.html.Accessed22August2013.