Ideology and interaction: Debating determinisms in literacy studies

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 351-359

  Collin, Ross ^a   Street, Brian V ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Adult; College university students; Critical analysis; Critical theory; Digital media literacies; Early adolescence; New literacies; Sociocultural; Theoretical perspectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903765679     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rrq.75     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Bartholet, J., (2013). MOOCs: Hype and hope. Scientific American, 309 (2), 53-61. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0813-53
2. Barton, D., (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139170109.010
3. Carr, N., (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
4. Collin, R., (2013). Revisiting Jack Goody to rethink determinisms in literacy studies. Reading Research Quarterly, 48 (1), 27-38. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.036
5. Digital revolution: Time to question our love affair with new tech [Editorial]. (2013, March 9). The Observer. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/2013/mar/10/new-technology-bleak-or-brave
6. Fletcher, S., (2013). How big data is taking teachers out of the lecturing business. Scientific American, 309 (2). Retrieved from www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-big-data-taking-teachers-out-lecturing- business/?page=3
7. Gee, J., (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
8. Goldman, S.R., Braasch, J.L.G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A.C., &, Brodowinska, K., (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47 (4), 356-381. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.027
9. Goody, J., (1968). Introduction. In, J. Goody, (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 1-26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. Goody, J., (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Goody, J., (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621598
12. Goody, J., (2000). The power of the written tradition. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
13. Goody, J., &, Watt, I., (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5 (3), 304-345. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500001730
14. Harvey, D., (2010). The enigma of capital: And the crises of capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Heath, S.B., (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kintsch, W., (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kirsch, I., Braun, H., Yamamoto, K., &, Sum, A., (2007). America's perfect storm: Three forces changing our nation's future. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/ PICSTORM.pdf
18. Lawless, K.A., &, Kulikowich, J.M., (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14 (4), 385-399. doi: 10.2190/DVAP-DE23-3XMV-9MXH
19. Lea, M., &, Jones, S., (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (4), 377-393. doi: 10.1080/03075071003664021
20. Lea, M., &, Street, B.V., (1998). Student writing and faculty feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2), 157-172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
21. McKenna, C., &, Hughes, J., (2013). Values, digital texts and open practices-A changing scholarly landscape in higher education. In, R. Goodfellow, &, M.R. Lea, (Eds.), Literacy in the digital university: Critical perspectives on learning, scholarship, and technology (pp. 15-26). New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Morozov, E., (2012). The Net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
23. Morozov, E., (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
24. Nichols, P., (2013, August 23). Spreading literacy, spreading Internet: Literacy has always been about more than just the ability to read. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/spreading- literacy-spreading-internet/279007/
25. OECD (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
26. O'Reilly, T., &, Sabatini, J., (2013). Reading for understanding: How performance moderators and scenarios impact assessment design. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27. Parr, C., (2013, September 12). Africa's mobile phone e-learning transformation. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from www.timeshighereducation. co.uk/features/africas-mobile-phone-e-learning-transformation/2007120. fullarticle
28. Rouet, J.-F., (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Schleicher, A., (2006). The economics of knowledge: Why education is key for Europe's success (Lisbon Council policy brief). Brussels, Belgium: Lisbon Council.
30. Scollon, R., &, Scollon, S.W., (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31. Scribner, S., &, Cole, M., (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Street, B.V., (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Street, B.V., (in press). Comments to the e-consultation on the upcoming Gender Equality Strategy. London, UK: British Association for Literacy in Development.
34. Waldrop, M.M., (2013). Online learning: Campus 2.0. Nature, 495 (7440), 160-163. doi: 10.1038/495160a