Inter-observer reliability for radiographic assessment of early osteoarthritis features: The CHECK (cohort hip and cohort knee) study

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 969-974

  Damen, J ^a   Schiphof, D ^a   Wolde, S Ten ^b   Cats, H A ^b   Bierma Zeinstra, S M A ^a   Oei, E H G ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Orthopaedics Erasmus MC ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Inter observer reliability; Osteoarthritis; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; JOINT CAVITY; JOINT SPACE NARROWING; KELLGREN AND LAWRENCE SCORE; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPHYTE; OSTEOSCLEROSIS; PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION; PREVALENCE ADJUSTED BIAS ADJUSTED KAPPA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SCIENTIST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW UP; HIP; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEOPHYTE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84903763882     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bucklandwright C. Which radiographic techniques should we use for research and clinical practice?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006, 20:39-55.
2. Bedson J., Croft P. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008, 9:116-127.
3. Duncan R., Peat G., Thomas E., Wood L., Hay E., Croft P. How do pain and function vary with compartmental distribution and severity of radiographic knee osteoarthritis?. Rheumatology 2008, 47(11):1704-1707.
4. Kinds M.B., Welsing P.M.J., Vignon E.P., Bijlsma J.W.J., Viergever M.A., Marijnissen A.C.A., et al. Asystematic review of the association between radiographic and clinical osteoarthritis of hip and knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 1-30.
5. Schiphof D., Boers M., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.A. Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 67:1034-1036.
6. Schiphof D., de Klerk B., Kerkhof H., Hofman A., Koes B., Boers M., et al. Impact of different descriptions of the Kellgren and Lawrence classification criteria on the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70(8):1422-1427.
7. Sun Y., Günther K.P., Brenner H. Reliability of radiographic grading of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Scand J Rheumatol 1997, 26:155-165.
8. Wesseling J., Dekker J., van den Berg W.B., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.A., Boers M., Cats H.A., et al. CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee): similarities and differences with the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:1413-1419.
9. Roorda L.D. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63(1):36-42.
10. Lequesne M.G., Laredo J.D. The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip. Ann Rheum Dis 1998, 57:676-681.
11. Altman R., Gold G. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised 1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:A1-A56.
12. Kellgren J.H., Lawrence J.S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957, 16:494-502.
13. Burnett S., Hart D.J., Cooper C., Spector T.D. ARadiographic Atlas of Osteoarthritis 1994, Springer Verlag, London.
14. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
15. Byrt T., Bishop J., Carlin J.B. Bias, prevalence and kappa. JClin Epidemiol 1993, 46(5):423-429.
16. Reijman M., Hazes J.M., Pols H.A., Bernsen R.M., Koes B.W., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M. Validity and reliability of three definitions of hip osteoarthritis: cross sectional and longitudinal approach. Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63:1427-1433.
17. Kinds M.B., Vincken K.L., Vignon E.P., Wolde S.Ten, Bijlsma J., Welsing P., et al. Radiographic features of knee and hip osteoarthritis represent characteristics of an individual, in addition to severity of osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2012, 41:141-149.
18. Kessler S., Guenther K.P., Puhl W. Scoring prevalence and severity in gonarthritis: the suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale. Clin Rheumatol 1998, 17:205-209.
19. Felson D.T., Niu J., Guermazi A., Sack B., Aliabadi P. Defining radiographic incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis: suggested modifications of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70:1884-1886.
20. Gossec L., Jordan J.M., Mazzuca S.A., Lam M.A., Suarez-Almazor M.E., Renner J.B., et al. Comparative evaluation of three semi-quantitative radiographic grading techniques for knee osteoarthritis in terms of validity and reproducibility in 1759 X-rays: report of the OARSI-OMERACT task force. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:742-748.
21. Scott W.W., Lethbridge-Cejku M., Reichle R., Wigley F.M., Tobin J.D., Hochberg M.C. Reliability of grading scales for individual radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee. The Baltimore longitudinal study of aging atlas of knee osteoarthritis. Invest Radiol 1993, 28:497-501.