Honeypots for distributed denial-of-service attacks

Proceedings of the Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 109-114

  Weiler, N ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Communication system traffic control; Computer crime; Computer networks; Distributed computing; IP networks; Laboratories; Proposals; Protection; Web and internet services; Web server

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; LABORATORIES; NETWORK SECURITY; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL; WEB SERVICES;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TRAFFIC; INTERNET SERVICES; IP NETWORKS; PROPOSALS; PROTECTION; WEB SERVERS;

DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACK;

EID: 84903755100     PISSN: 15244547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ENABL.2002.1029997     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Bellovin. ICMP Traceback Messages. http:www.research.att.com/~smb/papers/draft-bellovin-itrace-00.txt, March 2000.
2. CERT Cordination Center. CA-1999-17: Denial-of-Service Tools. http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1999-1.html.
3. CERT Cordination Center. CA-2000-01: Denial-of-Service Developments. http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-01.html.
4. CERT Cordination Center. CA-2000-21: Denial-of-Service Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP Stacks. http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-21.html.
5. Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Security Advisory: 7xx Router Password Buffer Overflow. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/pwbuf-pub.shtml, June 1998.
6. Cisco Systems, Inc. Defining Strategies to Protect against TCP SYN Denial of Service Attacks. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/4.html, July 1999.
7. P. Ferguson and D. Senie. Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial-of-service Attacks which Employ IP Source Address Spoofing. RFC 2267, January 1998.
8. A. Harrison. The Denial-of-service Attack Aftermath. http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/02/14/dos.aftermath.idg, 2000.
9. HoneyNet Project. http://project.honeynet.org/.
10. C. A. Huegen. The latest in Denial-of-Service Attacks: "Smurfing" Description and Information to Minimize Effects. White Paper, February 2000.
11. Microsoft Technical Support. Myriad Escaped Characters Vulnerability. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/fq00-023.asp, April 2000.
12. V. Paxson. An Analysis of Using Reflectors for Distributed Denial-of-Service Attacks. Computer Communication Review, 31(3), July 2001.
13. R. Power. 2001 CSI/FBI Computer Crime and Security Survey. Technical report, Computer Security Institute, 2001.
14. P. H. Salus. Cating the Net: From ARPANET to INTERNET and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
15. S. Savage, D. Wetherall, A. Karlin, and T. Anderson. Practical Network Support for IP Traceback. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2000, August 2000.
16. A. Snoeren, C. Partridge, L. Sanchez, W. Strayer, C. Jones, and F. Tchakountio. Hash-Based IP Traceback. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2001, August 2001.
17. Snort Signature Database. http://www.snort.org/snort-db.
18. D. Song and A. Perrig. Advanced and Authenticated Marking Schemes for IP Traceback. In Proceedings of ACM INFOCOM 2001, April 2001.
19. L. D. Stein and J. N. Stewart. The World Wide Web Security FAQ - Version 3.1.2. http://www.w3.org/Security/Faq/, February 2002.