Facebook: Public space, or private space?

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 974-985

  Burkell, Jacquelyn ^a   Fortier, Alexandre ^a  

^a Lola) Yeung Cheryl   (Canada)

Author keywords

Facebook; privacy; social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903754990     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.870591     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abril, P. S. (2007). Recasting privacy torts in a spaceless world. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 21(1), 1-47. Retrieved from http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v21/21HarvJLTech001.pdf
2. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1394/1312%23note4 doi: 10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
3. boyd, d. (2007). Why youth {black heart suit} social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Carey, R., & Burkell, J. (2009). A heuristics approach to understanding privacy-protecting behaviors in digital social environments. In I. Kerr, V. Steeves, & C. Lucock (Eds.), Lessons from the identity trail (pp. 65-82). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Cheung, A. S. Y. (2009). Rethinking public privacy in the Internet era: A study of virtual persecution by the Internet crowd. Journal of Media Law, 2, 191-217. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1683422
6. Crocker, T. P. (2009). From privacy to liberty: The fourth amendment after Lawrence. UCLA Law Review, 1, 1-69.
7. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J., Horn, A. K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
8. Frangione v. Vandongen et al., ONSC 2823 (2010).
9. Gelman, L. A. (2009). Privacy, free speech, and 'blurry-edged' social networks. Boston College Law Review, 50, 1315-1344. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1520111
10. Greenfield, A. (2011, April 20). Connected things, privacy and public space: Approach to a taxonomy. Paper prepared for Insights on Privacy Speaker Series, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Retrieved December 7, 2013, from http://www.priv.gc.ca/information/research-recherche/2011/greenfield_201104_e.asp
11. Grimmelmann, J. (2009). Saving Facebook. Iowa Law Review, 94, 1139-1206. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262822
12. Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (pp. 71-80). doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214
13. Häkkilä, J., & Chatfield, C. (2005). 'It's like if you opened someone else's letter': User perceived privacy and social practices with SMS communication. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 219-222). New York, NY: ACM.
14. Joinson, A. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and uses of Facebook. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027-1036). doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213
15. Kerr, O. S. (2010). Applying the fourth amendment to the Internet: A general approach. Stanford Law Review, 62, 1004-1049. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348322
16. Lange, P. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking and YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x
17. Lee, D. H. (2009). Mobile snapshots and public-private boundaries. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 22(3), 161-171. doi: 10.1007/s12130-009-9081-0
18. Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). 'Friending': London-based undergraduates' experience of Facebook. New Media and Society, 11(7), 1209-1229. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342058
19. Moreham, N. A. (2006). Privacy in public places. Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), 606-635. doi: 10.1017/S0008197306007240
20. Murphy v Perger, O.J. No. 5511 (2007).
21. Nissenbaum, H. F. (1998). Protecting privacy in and information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17, 559-596. Retrieved from http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/papers/privacy.pdf
22. Park v. Mullin, BCSC 1813 (2005).
23. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Trends in online social networking: Adolescent use of Myspace over time. New Media and Society, 12(2), 197-216. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341857
24. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25. R. v. Plant, 3 S.C.R. 281 (1993).
26. R. v. Tessling, 3 S.C.R. 432 (2004).
27. Rainie, L., Lenhart, A., & Smith, A. (2012). The tone of life on social networking sites. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Social-networking-climate.aspx
28. Rosenblum, D. (2007). What anyone can know: The privacy risks of social networking sites. Security and Privacy, 5(30), 40-49. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2007.75
29. Schuster v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, CanLII 58971 (ONSC 2009).
30. Sparks v. Dubé, NBQB 40 (2011).
31. Strahilevitz, L. J. (2004). A social networks theory of privacy. John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 230 (2D Series). University of Chicago. doi:10.2139/ssrn.629283
32. Thelwall, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2010). Public dialogs in social networks: What is their purpose? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 392-404. doi:10.1002/asi.21241
33. Tsjeng, Z. (2010, March 21). Facebook: Why we can't live without it. Guardian.co.uk. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/21/facebook-cant-live-without-it
34. Tverdek, E. (2008). What makes information 'public'? Public Affairs Quarterly, 22(1), 63-77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441479
35. Vaughan-Nichols, S. (2013, May 14). Facebook remains top social network, Google+, YouTube battle for second. ZDNet.com. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/facebook-remains-top-social-network-google-youtube-battle-for-second-7000015303/
36. Viégas, F. B. (2005). Bloggers' expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated communication, 10(3), Article 12. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/viegas.html