A clinical study to assess the effect of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice on hypersensitivity relative to a marketed sodium fluoride/triclosan control

Journal of Clinical Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 13-18

  He, Tao ^a   Barker, Matthew L ^a   Biesbrock, Aaron R ^a   Miner, Melanie ^a   Qaqish, Jimmy ^b   Sharma, Naresh ^b  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b BioSci Research Canada Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLGATE TOTAL ADVANCED; DESENSITIZING AGENT; SODIUM FLUORIDE; TIN FLUORIDE; TOOTHPASTE; TRICLOSAN;

ADULT; AGED; AIR; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG MIXTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; TOUCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AIR; COMPLEX MIXTURES; DENTIFRICES; DENTIN DESENSITIZING AGENTS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SODIUM FLUORIDE; TEMPERATURE; TIN FLUORIDES; TOUCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRICLOSAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903740681     PISSN: 08958831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J 2002;52:367-75.
2. Mantzourani M, Sharma D. Dentine hypersensitivity: past, present and future. J Dent 2013;Suppl 4:S3-17.
3. Gillam D, Chesters R, Attrill D, Brunton P, Slater M, Strand P, Whelton H, Bartlett D. Dentine hypersensitivity - guidelines for the management of a common oral health problem. Dent Update 2013;40:514-6,518-20,523-4.
4. Faller RV, Eversole SL, Tzeghai GE. Enamel protection: A comparison of marketed dentifrice performance against dental erosion. Am J Dent 2011;24:205-10.
5. Zero DT, Lussi A. Etiology of enamel erosion: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. In: Tooth Wear and Sensitivity, Addy M, Embry G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, eds. London, Martin Dunitz, pp. 21-39,2000.
6. Addy M, Shellis RP. Interaction between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. In: Erosion. From Diagnosis to Therapy, Lussi A, ed. Monographs in Oral Science. Karger, Switzerland, pp. 17-31,2006.
7. Pinto SC, Bandeca MC, Silva CN, Cavassim R, Borges AH, Sampaio JE. Erosive potential of energy drinks on the dentine surface. BMC Res Notes 2013;6:67.
8. Douglass CW, Sheets CG. Patients' expectations for oral health care in the 21st century. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(Suppl):S3-7.
9. Addy M. Etiology and clinical implications of dentine hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:503-14.
10. Ye W, Feng, XP, Li R. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in Chinese adults. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:182-7.
11. West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a European population-based cross-sectional study. J Dent 2013;41:841-51.
12. Liu HC, Lan WH, Hsieh CC. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Taipei, Taiwan. J Endod 1998;24:45-57.
13. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:666-72.
14. Fischer C, Fischer RG, Wennberg A. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent 1992;20:272-6.
15. von Troil B, Needleman I, Sanz M. A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl 3): 173-7.
16. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: definition, prevalence distribution and aetiology. In: Toothwear and Sensitivity: Clinical Advances in Restorative Dentistry, Addy M, Embery G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, eds. London, Martin Dunitz, pp. 239-42,2000.
17. BrÄnnstrÖm M. A hydrodynamic mechanism in the transmission of pain-producing stimuli through dentine. In: Sensory Mechanisms in Dentine: Proceedings of a Symposium, Anderson DJ, ed. Oxford, Pergamon, pp. 73-9,1963.
18. Ellingsen JE, Rolla G. Treatment of dentin with stannous fluorideSEM and electron microprobe study. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:281-6.
19. Miller S, Truong T, Heu R, Stranick M, Bouchard D, Gaffar A. Recent advances in stannous fluoride technology: antibacterial efficacy and mechanism of action towards hypersensitivity. Int Dent J 1994;44(Suppl 1): 83-98.
20. von Koppenfels RL. Stannous fluoride effects on dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 2005;84(Spec Iss):953.
21. Zsiska M, Gibbs M, Moore JA, White DJ, Tzeghai G. Smear layer formation and environmental stability of commercial dentifrices. J Dent Res 2012;91(Spec Iss A):745.
22. White DJ, Lawless MA, Fatade A, Baig A, von Koppenfels R, Duschner H, GÖtz H. Stannous fluoride/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice increases dentin resistance to tubule exposure in vitro. J Clin Dent 2007;18:55-9.
23. Harris R, Curtin JH. Dentine hypersensitivity. Aust Dent J 1976;21:165-9.
24. Sensabaugh CF, Sagel ME. Stannous fluoride dentifrice with sodium hexametaphosphate: Review of laboratory, clinical and practice-based data. J Dent Hyg 2009;83:70-8.
25. He T, Barker ML, Qaqish J, Sharma N. Fast onset sensitivity relief of a 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrice. J Clin Dent 2011;22:46-50.
26. He T, Chang J, Cheng R, Li X, Sun L, Biesbrock AR. Clinical evaluation f the fast onset and sustained sensitivity relief of a 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrice compared to an 8.0% arginine-calcium carbonate-sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice. Am J Dent 2011;24:336-40.
27. Schiff T, Saletta L, Baker RA, Winston JL, He T. Desensitizing effect of a stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26(9 Suppl 1):35-40.
28. Schiff T, He T, Sagel ME, Baker R. Efficacy and safety of a novel stabilized stannous fluoride and sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice for dental hypersensitivity. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;2:1-8.
29. Chaknis P, Panagakos FS, DeVizio W, Sowinski J, Petrone D, Proskin H. Assessment of hypersensitivity reduction of a dentifrice containing 0.3% riclosan, 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer, 0.243% NaF and specially-designed silica as compared to a dentifrice containing 0.454% stannous fluoride, sodium hexametaphosphate and zinc lactate and to a dentifrice containing 0.243% NaF on dentin hypersensitivity reduction: an 8-week study. Am J Dent 2011 ;24(Spec Iss A):14A-20.
30. Schiff T, Dotson M, Cohen S, De Vizio W, McCool J, Volpe A. Efficacy of a dentifrice containing potassium nitrate, soluble pyrophosphate, PVM/MA copolymer, and sodium fluoride on dentinal hypersensitivity: a twelve-week clinical study. J Clin Dent 1994;5(Spec Iss):87-92.
31. Tedesco LA. Behavioral research related to oral hygiene practices: a new century model of oral health promotion. Periodontol 2000 1995;8:15-23.