Changing Teacher Beliefs about Giftedness and Differentiation Practices

Gifted and Talented International

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 115-121

  Goodnough, Karen ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903738275     PISSN: 15332276     EISSN: 24709565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2001.11672973     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bell, J., (1999). Doing your research project: A guide for first time researchers in education and social science, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
2. Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K., (Eds.), (1995). Teachers’ beliefs and belief systems, Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon.
3. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K., (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Book, C., Byers, J., & Freeman, D., (1983). Student expectations and teacher education traditions with which we can and cannot live. Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (1), 9–13.
5. Butterfly, T., (1979). Preservice teachers’ attitudes regarding gifted children. College Student Journal, 12, 288–289.
6. Cashion, M., & Sullenger, K., (1996, April). What it means to be gifted: Changing beliefs, changing practice. Papaer presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
7. Copenhaver, R., & Melntyre, D., (1991). Teachers’ perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153.
8. Cramond, B., & Martin, C., (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers’ attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15–19.
9. Denzin, N. K., (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). London: Sage.
10. Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Gamer, D., & Steinmetz, A. M., (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles, New York: Falmer Press.
11. ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (1990). Giftedness and gifted: What’s it all about? Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERlCDigests/ed321481.html
12. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H., (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). London: Sage.
13. Gardner, H., (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York: Basic Books.
14. Gardner, H., (1999). Intelligences reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
15. Good, T. L., (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (4), 32–47.
16. Guba, E. G., (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91.
17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S., (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Guskin, S. L., Peng, C., & Majd-Jabbari. (1988). Teachers’ perceptions of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 216–220.
19. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G., (1992). Understanding teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Kagan, D., (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.
21. Keating, D. P., (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced: A developmental alternative. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1 (1), 53–83.
22. Lasley, T., (1980). Preservice teacher beliefs about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 31 (4), 38–41.
23. Maker, J. C., & Nielson, A. B., (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
24. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R., (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.
25. Merseth, K., (1991). The case for cases in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
26. Miller, B., & Kantrov, I., (1998). A guide to facilitating cases in education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
27. Miller, J. P., & Seller, W., (1990). Curriculum perspectives and practice. Toronto, Canada: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.
28. Munby, H., (1982). The place of teachers’ beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternate methodology. International Science, 11, 201–225.
29. Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H., (1998). Becoming a teacher. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
30. Parke, B., (1989). Gifted students in regular classrooms. Toronto, Canada: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Renzulli, J. S., (1997, July). Five dimensions of differentiation. Keynote presentation at the 20th Annual Confratute Conference, Storrs, CT.
32. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M., (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, R. H., (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Sanders, D. P., & McCutcheon, G., (1986). The development of practical theories of teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2, 50–67.
35. Shulman, L., (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–15.
36. Starko, A., & Schack, G., (1984). Perceived need, teacher efficacy, and teaching strategies for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 118–122.
37. Sternberg, R., (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Sternberg, R., (1988). The triarchic mind: A theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
39. Sternberg, R. J., (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice. In N., Colangelo & G. G., Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Strauss, A. L., (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Tabachnick, B., & Zeichner, K., (1984). The impact of the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (6), 28–36.
42. Tomlinson, C. A., (1994, April). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of and responses to the differential needs of gifted students in their classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 060)
43. Tomlinson, C. A., (1995). Differentiating instruction for advanced learners in the mixed ability middle school classroom. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 141)
44. Tomlinson, C. A., (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
45. Zeichner, K., & Tabachnick, B., (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education ‘washed out’ by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32 (30), 7–11.