Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring

Future Cardiology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 319-322

  Cheung, Christopher C ^a   Kerr, Charles R ^a   Krahn, Andrew D ^a  

^a Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre Vancouver Coastal Health   (Canada)

Author keywords

adhesive patch monitor; arrhythmia; Holter monitor; Zio Patch

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART ATRIUM FLUTTER; HEART BLOCK; HEART VENTRICLE TACHYCARDIA; HOLTER MONITOR; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOTE; POLYMORPHIC VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ST SEGMENT; SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIAC; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; PROCEDURES;

ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIAC; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84903704600     PISSN: 14796678     EISSN: 17448298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/fca.14.24     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Gibson TC, Heitzman MR. Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope. Am. J. Cardiol. 53(8), 1013-1017 (1984).
2. Bass EB, Curtiss EI, Arena VC et al. The duration of Holter monitoring in patients with syncope. Is 24 hours enough? Arch. Int. Med. 150(5), 1073-1078 (1990).
3. Barrett PM, Komatireddy R, Haaser S et al. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am. J. Med. 127(1), 95.e11-95.e17 (2014).
4. Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Josephson ME, Goldberger AL, Cohen DJ. Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann. Int. Med. 128(11), 890-895 (1998).
5. Sivakumaran S, Krahn AD, Klein GJ et al. A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. Am. J. Med. 115(1), 1-5 (2003).
6. Reiffel JA, Schwarzberg R, Murry M. Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. Am. J. Cardiol. 95(9), 1055-1059 (2005).
7. Lobodzinski SS, Laks MM. New devices for very long-term ECG monitoring. Cardiol. J. 19(2), 210-214 (2012).
8. Ackermans PA, Solosko TA, Spencer EC et al. A user-friendly integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring. J. Electrocardiol. 45(2), 148-153 (2012).
9. Rosenberg MA, Samuel M, Thosani A, Zimetbaum PJ. Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 36(3), 328-333 (2013).
10. Rothman SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 18(3), 241-247 (2007).
11. Stern S, Tzivoni D. Early detection of silent ischaemic heart disease by 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring of active subjects. Br. Heart J. 36(5), 481-486 (1974).