Wildfire exposure and fuel management on western US national forests

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 145, Issue , 2014, Pages 54-70

  Ager, Alan A ^a   Day, Michelle A ^b   McHugh, Charles W ^c   Short, Karen ^c   Gilbertson Day, Julie ^c   Finney, Mark A ^c   Calkin, David E ^c  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Burn probability; National forest; Risk assessment; Wildfire exposure; Wildfire risk

Indexed keywords

FIRES; FORESTRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

BURN PROBABILITIES; ECOLOGICAL LOSS; FUELS MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES; NATIONAL FORESTS; NATIONAL STRATEGIES; RISKS ASSESSMENTS; SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENTS; WILDFIRE EXPOSURE; WILDFIRE RISKS;

INVESTMENTS;

FUEL;

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FUEL; INVESTMENT LOCATION; NATIONAL STRATEGY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; WILDFIRE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOGO SELVAGEM; FOREST; FUEL MANAGEMENT; PREDICTION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; UNITED STATES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FIRE; PROBABILITY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

UNITED STATES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FIRES; FORESTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84903704418     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.035     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agee J.K. Fire Ecology of the Pacific Northwest 1993, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
2. Ager A.A., Buonopane M., Reger A., Finney M.A. Wildfire exposure analysis on the national forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Risk Anal. 2012, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01911.x.
3. Ager A.A., Finney M.A., Kerns B.K., Maffei H. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 246:45-56.
4. Ager A.A., Vaillant N.M., Finney M.A., Preisler H.K. Analyzing wildfire exposure and source-sink relationships on a fire-prone forest landscape. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 267:271-283.
5. Ager A.A., Vaillant N.M., Finney M.A. Acomparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259:1556-1570.
6. Ager A.A., Vaillant N.M., Finney M.A. Integrating fire behavior models and geospatial analysis for wildland fire risk assessment and fuel management planning. J.Combust. 2011, Article ID 572452. 10.1155/2011/572452.
7. Bailey D. National dialogue needed about WUI fires. Wildfire September/October 2013, 6-7.
8. Balch J.K., Bradley B.A., D'Antonio C.M., Gómez-Dans J. Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980-2009). Global Change Biol. 2013, 19:173-183.
9. Bhaduri B., Bright E., Coleman P., Urban M. LandScan USA: a high resolution geospatial and temporal modeling approach for population distribution and dynamics. GeoJournal 2007, 69:103-117.
10. Bostwick P., Menakis J., Sexton T. How Fuel Treatments Saved Homes from the 2011 Wallow Fire 2011, Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Assessment, August 16, 2011, National Advanced Fire and Resource Institute, Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center.
11. Bradshaw L.S., Deeming J.E., Burgan R.E., Cohen J.D. The 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating System: Technical Documentation 1984, (Gen. Tech. Rep., INT-169), USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
12. Butler B., Forthofer J., Finney M., McHugh C., Stratton R., Bradshaw L. The impact of high resolution wind field simulations on the accuracy of fire growth predictions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 234:S85.
13. Byram G.M. Combustion of forest fuels. Forest Fire: Control and Use 1959, 61-89. McGraw-Hill, New York. K.P. Brown (Ed.).
14. Collins B.M., Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Battles J. Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. J.Forestry 2010, 108:24-31.
15. FAO Fire Management - Global Assessment 2006 2007, FAO Forestry Paper No. 151, Rome.
16. Finney M.A. Fire growth using minimum travel time methods. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32:1420-1424.
17. Finney M.A. The challenge of quantitative risk assessment for wildland fire. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 211:97-108.
18. Finney M.A., McHugh C.W., Grenfell I.C., Riley K.L., Short K.C. Asimulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2011, 25:973-1000.
19. Finney M.A., Seli R.C., McHugh C.W., Ager A.A., Bahro B., Agee J.K. Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2007, 16:712-727.
20. FIRESTAT Fire Statistics System 2011, US Forest Service, (accessed 11.11.11). http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/planning/nist/firestat.htm.
21. FPA Fire Program Analysis 2010, http://www.fpa.nifc.gov/.
22. GAO Wildland Fires: Forest Service and BLM Need Better Information and a Systematic Approach for Assessing the Risks of Environmental Effects 2004, GAO-04-705, Washington, D.C.
23. GAO Wildland Fire Management: Better Information and a Systematic Process Could Improve Agencies' Approach to Allocating Fuel Reduction Funds and Selecting Projects 2007, GAO-07-1168, Washington, D.C.
24. GAO Wildland Fire Management: Federal Agencies Have Taken Important Steps Forward, but Additional Action is Needed to Address Remaining Challenges 2009, GAO-09-906T, Washington, D.C.
25. Gartner S., Reynolds K., Hessburg P., Hummel S., Twery M. Decision support for evaluating landscape departure and prioritizing forest management activities in a changing environment. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256:1666-1676.
26. Graham R.T., Jain T.B., Matthews S. Fuel management in forests of the Inland West. Cumulative Watershed Effects of Fuel Management in the Western United States 2010, 19-68. (Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-231), USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. W.J. Elliot, I.S. Miller, L. Audin (Eds.).
27. Hessburg P.F., Reynolds K.M., Keane R.E., James K.M., Salter R.B. Evaluating wildland fire danger and prioritizing vegetation and fuels treatments. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 247:1-17.
28. Heyerdahl E.K., Morgan P., Riser J.P. Multi-season climate synchronized historical fires in dry forests (1650-1900), Northern Rockies, USA. Ecology 2008, 89:705-716.
29. Hudak A.T., Rickert I., Morgan P., Strand E., Lewis S.A., Robichaud P.R., Hoffman C., Holden Z.A. Review of Fuel Treatment Effectiveness in Forests and Rangelands and a Case Study from the 2007 Megafires in Central Idaho USA 2011, (Gen. Tech. Rep., RMRS-GTR-252), USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
30. Keller P. Wallow Fire Fuel Treatment Effectiveness on the Fort Apache Indian Reservation 2011, National Advanced Fire and Resource Institute, Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center.
31. LANDFIRE Homepage of the LANDFIRE Project 2013, http://www.landfire.gov/index.php.
32. LANDFIRE LANDFIRE ver. 1.1.0 2008 Mean Fire Return Interval Layer 2013, U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey, (accessed 27.02.13). http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/.
33. LandScan USA High Resolution Global Population Data Set 2009, Copyrighted by UT-Battelle, LLC, operator of Oak Ridge National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR227725 with the United States Department of Energy. http://www.ornl.gov/sci/landscan/.
34. Lippitt C.L., Stow D.A., O'Leary J.F., Franklin J. Influence of short-interval fire occurrence on post-fire recovery of fire-prone shrublands in California, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2013, 22:184-193.
35. McHugh, C.W., Finney, M.A., Unpublished Results. Estimation of Historical Annual Burning Across the Continental United States. (Gen. Tech. Rep., RMRS-GTR-XXX). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
36. Miller C., Ager A.A. Areview of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2012, 22:1-14.
37. Morgan P., Heyerdahl E.K., Miller C., Wilson A.M., Gibson C.E. Northern Rockies pyrogeography: an example of fire atlas utility. Fire Ecol. 2014, 10:14-30.
38. Noonan-Wright E.K., Opperman T.S., Finney M.A., Zimmerman G.T., Seli R.C., Elenz L.M., Calkin D.E., Fiedler J.R. Developing the US wildland fire decision support system. J.Combust. 2011, 10.1155/2011/168473.
39. Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B., Stewart S.I., Fried J.S., Holcomb S.S., McKeefry J.F. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:799-805.
40. Reinhardt E.D., Keane R.E., Calkin D.E., Cohen J.D. Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256:1997-2006.
41. Rollins M.G. LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18:235-249.
42. Rollins M.G., Frame C.K. The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: Nationally Consistent and Locally Relevant Geospatial Data for Wildland Fire Management 2006, (Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-175), USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
43. Safford H.D., Stevens J.T., Merriam K., Meyer M.D., Latimer A.M. Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 274:17-28.
44. Schmidt D., Taylor A.H., Skinner C.N. The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behavior, southern Cascade Range, California. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255:3170-3184.
45. Short K.C. Spatial Wildfire Occurrence Data for the United States, 1992-2011 2013, (FPA_FOD_20130422), USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. doi:10.2737/RDS-2013-0009.
46. Stephens S.L., Ruth L.W. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:532-542.
47. Syphard A.D., Clarke K.C., Franklin J. Simulating fire frequency and urban growth in southern California coastal shrublands, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:431-445.
48. Thompson M., Calkin D., Finney M., Ager A., Gilbertson-Day J. Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2011, 25:761-780.
49. USDA-USDI National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy 2014, http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/index.shtml.
50. USDA Fiscal Year 2013 President's Budget: Budget Justification 2012, http://www.fs.fed.us/aboutus/budget/2013/fy2013-justification.pdf.
51. USDA Forest Service National Wildfire Management Report to Congress and Cohesive Strategy 2010, (Report to Congress), USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
52. USDA Forest Service Fire and Aviation Management Fiscal Year 2011 Accountability Report 2011, USDA Forest Service.
53. USDA Forest Service Watershed Condition Framework: A Framework for Assessing and Tracking Changes to Watershed Condition 2011, FS-977.
54. Venn T.J., Calkin D.E. Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20:327-339.
55. Whisenant S.G. Changing fire frequencies on Idaho's Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. Proceedings-Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management 1990, 4-10. (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-276), USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Las Vegas, NV.
56. Williams J. Exploring the onset of high-impact mega-fires through a forest land management prism. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 294:4-10.
57. Zachariassen J., Zeller K.F., Nikolov N., McClelland T. AReview of the Forest Service Remote Automated Weather Station (RAWS) Network 2003, 153. (Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-119), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.