Teaching turn-taking and turn-yielding in meetings with deaf and hearing participants

Advances in Teaching Sign Language Interpreters

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 151-169

  Van Herreweghe, Mieke ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903667982     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Baker, C. 1977. Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language. In On the other hand: new perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. L. Friedman, 215-36. New York: Academic Press.
2. Coates, J. 1994. No gap, lots of overlap: Turn-taking patterns in the talk of women friends. In Researching language and literacy in social context, ed. D. Graddol, J. Maybin, and B. Stierer, 177-92. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
3. Coates, J. 1997a. One-at-a-time: The organisation of men's talk. In Language and masculinity, ed. S. Johnson and U. Meinhof, 107-129. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Coates, J. 1997b. The construction of a collaborative floor in women's friendly talk. In Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives, ed. T. Givon, 55-89. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Coates, J., and R. Sutton-Spence. 2001. Turn-taking patterns in Deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5/4: 507-29.
6. Edelsky, C. 1981. Who's got the floor? Language in Society 10:383-421.
7. D. Tannen, Gender and conversational interaction, 189-227. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
8. Jones, L. 1983. Eight simulations: For upper-intermediate and more advanced students of English: Participant's book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Larrue, J., and A. Trognon. 1993. Organization of turn-taking and mechanisms for turn-taking repair in a chaired meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 19 (2):177-96.
10. Lerner, G. H. 1993. Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text 13 (2):213-45.
11. Martinez, L. B. 1995. Turn-taking and eye gaze in sign conversations between Deaf Filipinos. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities, ed. C. Lucas, 272-306. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
12. Mather, S. A. 1987. Eye gaze and communication in a deaf classroom. Sign Language Studies 54:11-29.
13. Metzger, M. 1999. Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
14. Metzger, M. 2000. Interactive Roleplays as a teaching strategy. In Innovative Practices for Teaching Sign Language Interpreters, ed. C. Roy, 83-108. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
15. Roy, C. 1989. A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter's role in the turn exchanges of an interpreted event. Ph.D. diss., Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
16. Roy, C. 1993. A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter's role in simultaneous talk in interpreted interaction. Multilingua 12 (4):341-63.
17. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4):696-735.
18. Van Herreweghe, M. 2000. Language choice and active participation in meetings with Deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. Paper presented at the international conference Text and talk at work, August 2000. Ghent University, Belgium.
19. Van Herreweghe, M 2002. Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with Deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. In Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages: Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities, vol. 8, ed. C. Lucas, 73-103. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
20. Van Herreweghe, M., and M. VanNuffel. 2000. Sign (language) interpreting in Flanders. Journal of Interpretation :101-27.
21. Van Herreweghe, M., and M. Vermeerbergen. 1998. Thuishoren in een Wereld van Gebaren. Gwent: Academia Press.