Standardization of multiparametric prostate MR imaging using PI-RADS

BioMed Research International

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Bomers, Joyce G R ^a   Barentsz, Jelle O ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CELL DENSITY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE IMAGING AND REPORTING ARCHIVING DATA SYSTEM; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL CORD VENTRAL HORN; STANDARDIZATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; STANDARD; STANDARDS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84903640320     PISSN: 23146133     EISSN: 23146141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2014/431680     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Sciarra A., Barentsz J., Bjartell A., Eastham J., Hricak H., Panebianco V., Witjes J. A., Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. European Urology 2011 59 6 962 977 2-s2.0-79955606529 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.034
2. Barentsz J. O., Richenberg J., Clements R., ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. European Radiology 2012 22 4 746 757 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
3. Girouin N., Mège-Lechevallier F., Tonina Senes A., Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable? European Radiology 2007 17 6 1498 1509 2-s2.0-34248640136 10.1007/s00330-006-0478-9 (Pubitemid 46767598)
4. Tanimoto A., Nakashima J., Kohno H., Shinmoto H., Kuribayashi S., Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007 25 1 146 152 2-s2.0-33846187280 10.1002/jmri.20793 (Pubitemid 46095209)
5. Nagel K. N., Schouten M. G., Hambrock T., Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T. Radiology 2013 267 1 164 172 10.1148/radiol.12111683
6. Tamada T., Sone T., Jo Y., Toshimitsu S., Yamashita T., Yamamoto A., Tanimoto D., Ito K., Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2008 28 3 720 726 2-s2.0-51449120919 10.1002/jmri.21503
7. Hambrock T., Somford D. M., Huisman H. J., Van Oort I. M., Witjes J. A., Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa C. A., Scheenen T., Barentsz J. O., Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T mr imaging and gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 2011 259 2 453 461 2-s2.0-79955030798 10.1148/radiol.11091409
8. Kobus T., Vos P. C., Hambrock T., Prostate cancer aggressiveness: in vivo assessment of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T. Radiology 2012 265 2 457 467 10.1148/radiol.12111744
9. Villeirs G. M., Oosterlinck W., Vanherreweghe E., de Meerleer G. O., A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. European Journal of Radiology 2010 73 2 352 356 2-s2.0-76349100719 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.034
10. Coakley F. V., Hricak H., Radiologic anatomy of the prostate gland: a clinical approach. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2000 38 1 15 30 2-s2.0-0033978061 (Pubitemid 30059003)
11. Quint L. E., Van Erp J. S., Bland P. H., Del Buono E. A., Mandell S. H., Grossman H. B., Gikas P. W., Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology 1991 179 3 837 842 2-s2.0-0025779939
12. Shukla-Dave A., Hricak H., Moskowitz C., Ishill N., Akin O., Kuroiwa K., Spector J., Kumar M., Reuter V. E., Koutcher J. A., Zakian K. L., Detection of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging: an expanded paradigm incorporating polyamines. Radiology 2007 245 2 499 506 2-s2.0-35349029795 10.1148/radiol.2452062201 (Pubitemid 47612532)
13. Cruz M., Tsuda K., Narumi Y., Kuroiwa Y., Nose T., Kojima Y., Okuyama A., Takahashi S., Aozasa K., Barentz J. O., Nakamura H., Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging. European Radiology 2002 12 2 357 365 2-s2.0-0036479948 10.1007/s003300101044 (Pubitemid 36940072)
14. Qayyum A., Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics 2009 29 6 1797 1810 2-s2.0-77449128265 10.1148/rg.296095521
15. Kuru T. H., Roethke M. C., Rieker P., Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. BJU International 2013 112 8 1080 1087 10.1111/bju.12259
16. Baur A. D., Maxeiner A., Franiel T., Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate. Investigative Radiology 2014 49 6 411 420 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000030
17. Franiel T., Lüdemann L., Rudolph B., Rehbein H., Staack A., Taupitz M., Prochnow D., Beyersdorff D., Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. Investigative Radiology 2008 43 7 481 487 2-s2.0-50949130679 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31816b2f63
18. Kozlowski P., Chang S. D., Jones E. C., Berean K. W., Chen H., Goldenberg S. L., Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis-correlation with biopsy and histopathology. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006 24 1 108 113 2-s2.0-33745714414 10.1002/jmri.20626
19. Junker D., Schäfer G., Edlinger M., Evaluation of the PI-RADS scoring system for classifying mpMRI findings in men with suspicion of prostate cancer. BioMed Research International 2013 2013 9 252939 10.1155/2013/252939
20. Rosenkrantz A. B., Kim S., Lim R. P., Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 2013 269 2 482 492 10.1148/radiol.13122233
21. Roethke M. C., Kuru T. H., Schultze S., Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla. European Radiology 2014 24 2 344 352 10.1007/s00330-013-3017-5
22. Thompson J. E., Moses D., Shnier R., Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guiding diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer, and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over-detection: a prospective study. The Journal of Urology 2014 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014
23. Schimmöller L., Quentin M., Arsov C., Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard. European Radiology 2013 23 11 3185 3190 10.1007/s00330-013-2922-y
24. Portalez D., Mozer P., Cornud F., Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. European Urology 2012 62 6 986 996 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044