Understanding requirements engineering process: A challenge for practice and education

Internet and Information Technology in Modern Organizations: Challenges and Answers - Proceedings of the 5th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2005

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Nguyen, Lemai ^a   Armarego, Jocelyn ^b   Swatman, Paul ^c  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; STUDENTS;

COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY; INCREMENTAL PROCESS; MODEL-BASED OPC; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS; REQUIREMENTS MODELS; TRADITIONAL LEARNING;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 84903589632     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Alexander, I. (1998). Requirements Engineering as a Co-operative Inquiry: A Framework, in Proceedings of Conference on European Industrial Requirements Engineering CEIRE '98. London, UK.
2. Armarego, J. (2004). Learning Requirements Engineering within an Engineering Ethos, in Proceedings of 9th Australian Workshop on Requirements Engineering AWRE'04. Adelaide, Australia.
3. Batra, D. and Davis J.G. (1992). Conceptual data modelling in database design: similarities and differences between expert and novice designers. International Journal Man-Machine Studies. 37: p. 83-101.
4. Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin T.N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power, Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bubenko, J.A.J. (1995). Challenges in requirements engineering, in Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.
6. Carroll, J. and Swatman P.A. (1999). Opportunism in the Requirements Engineering Process, School of Information Systems, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Society, Culture, and Person: a System View of Creativity, in The Nature of Creativity, R.J. Sternberg, (Editor) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 325-339.
8. Dallman, S., Nguyen L., Lamp J., and Cybulski J. (2005). Contextual Factors which Influence Creativity in Requirements Engineering, in To appear in the Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2005. Regensburg, Germany.
9. Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus S.E. (1986). Mind over Machine, New York: Free Press.
10. Gigch, J.P. (2000). Metamodelling and problem solving. Journal of Applied Systems Studies. 1(2): p. pp. 327-336.
11. Gobet, F. and Wood D. (1999). Expertise, models of learning and computer-based tutoring. Computers & Education(33): p. pp. 189-207.
12. Guindon, R. (1989). The Process of Knowledge Discovery in System Design, in Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, G. Salvendy and Smith M.J., (Editors), Elsevier Science Publisher: Amsterdam Netherlands. p. 727-734.
13. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction. 5: p. 305-344.
14. Hadamard, J. (1954). The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, New York: Dover Publications.
15. Hofmann, H.F. and Lehner F. (2001). Requirements Engineering as a Success Factor in Software Projects. IEEE Software. 18(4): p. pp.58-66.
16. Kearsley, G. (2000). Explorations in Learning & Instruction: the theory in practice database, Washington (DC): George Washington University.
17. Khushalani, A., Smith R., and Howard S. (1994). What Happens when Designers Don't Play by the Rules: Towards a Model of Opportunistic Behaviour in Design. Australian Journal of Information Systems. 1(2): p. 13-31.
18. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edition ed, Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
19. Lawson, B. (1997). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 3rd edition ed, Oxford: Architectural Press. 318.
20. Loucopoulos, P. and Karakostas V. (1995). System Requirements Engineering, New York USA: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
21. Maiden, N. and Gizikis A. (2001). Where do Requirements Come from? IEEE Software. 18(5): p. 10-12.
22. Maiden, N., Manning S., Robertson S., and Greenwood J. (2004). Integrating creativity workshops into structured requirements processes, in Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems. Cambridge, MA, USA: ACM Press.
23. McBreen, P. (1999). Creativity in Software Development. McBreen.Consulting. URL: http://mcbreen.ab.ca/papers/CreativityPaper.html.
24. Nguyen, L. and Swatman P.A. (2003). Managing the Requirements Engineering Process. Requirements Engineering. 8(1): p. 55-68.
25. Nguyen, L. and Swatman P.A. (2006). Promoting and Supporting Requirements Engineering Creativity, in Rationale Management in Software Engineering, A.H. Dutoit, McCall R., Mistrik I., and Paech B., (Editors), Springer-Verlag/Computer Science Editorial.
26. Nguyen, L., Swatman P.A., and Shanks G. (1999). Using Design Explanation within Formal Object-Oriented Method. Requirements Engineering. 4(3): p. 152-164.
27. Ohlsson, S. (1984). I. Restructuring Revisited: Summary and Critique of the Gestalt Theory of Problem Solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 25: p. 65-78.
28. Plsek, P.E. (1997). Directed Creativity Cycle. Available at: http://www.directedcreativity.com/pages/Cycle.htm l.
29. Pohl, K. (1994). Three Dimensions of Requirements Engineering: A Framework and its Application. Information Systems. 19(3): p. 243-258.
30. Poincaré, H. (1952). Science and Method, New York.: Dover Publications.
31. Robertson, J. (2005). Requirements Analysts Must Also Be Inventors. IEEE Software. Jan Feb.
32. Robertson, S. and Robertson J. (1999). Mastering the Requirements Process, London, UK.: Addison-Wesley.
33. Robillard, P.N. (1999). The Role of Knowledge in Software Development. Communication of the ACM. 42(1): p. 87-92.
34. Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: untold stories, Buckingham (UK): Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
35. Sutcliffe, A.G. and Maiden N.A.M. (1992). Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering. International Journal Man-Machine Studies. 36: p. 719-740.
36. Torrance, E.P. (1997). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing, in The Nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives, R.J. Sternberg, (Editor) Cambridge Uni.: UK. p. 43-75.
37. Visser, W. (1990). More or less following a plan during design: Opportunistic deviations in specifications. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 33: p. 247-278.
38. Visser, W. (1992). Designers' activities examined at three levels: organization, strategies and problem-solving processes. Knowledge-Based Systems. 5(1): p. 92-104.
39. Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought, London England: Jonathan Cape.
40. Winn, W. and Snyder D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology, in Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, D.H. Jonassen, (Editor) Simon & Schuster Macmillan: New York. p. pp. 112-142.