Lower limb movement preparation in chronic stroke: A pilot study toward an fnirs-bci for gait rehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 564-575

  Rea, Massimiliano ^a   Rana, Mohit ^a   Lugato, Nicola ^a   Terekhin, Pavel ^a   Gizzi, Leonardo ^b   Brötz, Doris ^a   Fallgatter, Andreas ^a   Birbaumer, Niels ^a,c   Sitaram, Ranganatha ^a,d,e   Caria, Andrea ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c Istitudo di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Multimedia Scientific and Technology Pole   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

BCI; EMG; FNIRS; Gait; Motor preparation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPH; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; GAIT; HEMISPHERE; HEMODYNAMICS; HIP; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OPTICAL TOPOGRAPHY DEVICE; PILOT STUDY; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PREMOTOR CORTEX; STROKE PATIENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; AGED; BRAIN CORTEX; COMPLICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC GAIT DISORDER; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROOF OF CONCEPT; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HIP; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 84903577263     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968313520410     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75-82 (Pubitemid 40439461)
2. Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a topdown approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:66
3. Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol. 2007;579(pt 3):621-636 (Pubitemid 46404346)
4. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:910-917 (Pubitemid 351619582)
5. Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al. Brainmachine- interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:100-108
6. Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron JC. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:493-502 (Pubitemid 36876106)
7. Caria A, Weber C, Brotz D, et al. Chronic stroke recovery after combined BCI training and physiotherapy: a case report. Psychophysiology. 2011;48:578-582
8. Sitaram R, Veit R, Stevens B, et al. Acquired control of ventral premotor cortex activity by feedback training: an exploratory real-time FMRI and TMS study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:256-265
9. Varkuti B, Guan C, Pan Y, et al. Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:53-62
10. Do AH, Wang PT, King CE, Chun SN, Nenadic Z. Braincomputer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis: a case report. Paper presented at: International Conference of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society; 2012
11. Zhang D, Liu G, Huan G, Liu J, Zhu X. A hybrid FES rehabilitation system based on CPG and BCI technology for locomotion: a preliminary study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2009;5928:1073-1084
12. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006;37:1941- 1952 (Pubitemid 44297755)
13. Sitaram R, Zhang H, Guan C, et al. Temporal classification of multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy signals of motor imagery for developing a brain-computer interface. Neuroimage. 2007;34:1416-1427 (Pubitemid 46187084)
14. Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A, Doyon J. Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:330-340 (Pubitemid 351852636)
15. Daly JJ, Wolpaw Jr. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1032-1043
16. Gallivan JP, McLean DA, Valyear KF, Pettypiece CE, Culham JC. Decoding action intentions from preparatory brain activity in human parieto-frontal networks. J Neurosci. 2011;31:9599-9610
17. Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:856-869
18. Thoenissen D, Zilles K, Toni I. Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention. J Neurosci. 2002;22:9024-9034 (Pubitemid 35379072)
19. Vesia M, Davare M. Decoding action intentions in parietofrontal circuits. J Neurosci. 2011;31:16491-16493
20. Deiber MP, Ibanez V, Sadato N, Hallett M. Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:233-247 (Pubitemid 26072036)
21. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1641-1647 (Pubitemid 41115829)
22. Okada E, Delpy DT. Near-infrared light propagation in an adult head model. I. Modeling of low-level scattering in the cerebrospinal fluid layer. Appl Optics. 2003;42: 2906-2914
23. Sato H, Kiguchi M, Maki A. Wavelength dependence of effective pathlength factor in noninvasive optical measurements of human brain functions. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2006;45:L361-L363
24. Toronov V, Franceschini MA, Filiaci M, et al. Near-infrared study of fluctuations in cerebral hemodynamics during rest and motor stimulation: temporal analysis and spatial mapping. Med Phys. 2000;27:801-815 (Pubitemid 30227058)
25. Horn BKP. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Amer A. 1987;4:629-642
26. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:120-131 (Pubitemid 30456920)
27. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2000;12:191-200 (Pubitemid 32843166)
28. Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V, et al. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1064-1080
29. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI singlesubject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15:273-289 (Pubitemid 34852226)
30. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:361-374
31. Takahashi T, Takikawa Y, Kawagoe R, Shibuya S, Iwano T, Kitazawa S. Influence of skin blood flow on near-infrared spectroscopy signals measured on the forehead during a verbal fluency task. Neuroimage. 2011;57:991-1002
32. Yamada T, Umeyama S, Matsuda K. Separation of fNIRS signals into functional and systemic components based on differences in hemodynamic modalities. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50271
33. Gagnon L, Cooper RJ, Yucel MA, Perdue KL, Greve DN, Boas DA. Short separation channel location impacts the performance of short channel regression in NIRS. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2518-2528
34. Jang KE, Tak S, Jung J, Jang J, Jeong Y, Ye JC. Wavelet minimum description length detrending for near-infrared spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(3):034004
35. Cope M, Delpy DT. System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infra-red transillumination. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988;26:289-294
36. Sun J, Loader C. Simultaneous confidence bands for linear regression and smoothing. Ann Statist. 1994;22:1328-1345
37. Tai K, Chau T. Single-trial classification of NIRS signals during emotional induction tasks: towards a corporeal machine interface. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:39
38. Coyle SM, Ward TE, Markham CM. Brain-computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system. J Neural Eng. 2007;4:219-226
39. Dobbin KK, Simon RM. Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers. BMC Med Genomics. 2011;4:31
40. Endo H, Kato Y, Kizuka T, Masuda T, Takeda T. Bilateral cerebral activity for unilateral foot movement revealed by whole-head magnetoencephalography. Somatosens Mot Res. 2004;21:33-43 (Pubitemid 38482616)
41. Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, et al. Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage. 2001;14:1186-1192 (Pubitemid 33049860)
42. Miyai I, Yagura H, Hatakenaka M, Oda I, Konishi I, Kubota K. Longitudinal optical imaging study for locomotor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2866-2870 (Pubitemid 37517758)
43. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:528-536 (Pubitemid 39489836)
44. Eyre JA. Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31:1136-1149 (Pubitemid 350160952)
45. Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Hand motor recovery after stroke: tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:21-33
46. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behavior. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:861-872
47. Ward NS. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:527-535 (Pubitemid 41381573)
48. Madhavan S, Rogers LM, Stinear JW. A paradox: after stroke the non-lesioned lower limb motor cortex may be maladaptive. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;32:1032-1039
49. Desmurget M, Sirigu A. A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13:411-419
50. Sahyoun C, Floyer-Lea A, Johansen-Berg H, Matthews PM. Towards an understanding of gait control: brain activation during the anticipation, preparation and execution of foot movements. Neuroimage. 2004;21:568-575 (Pubitemid 38229918)
51. Miyai I, Suzuki M, Hatakenaka M, Kubota K. Effect of body weight support on cortical activation during gait in patients with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2006;169:85-91 (Pubitemid 43286725)
52. Suzuki M, Miyai I, Ono T, Kubota K. Activities in the frontal cortex and gait performance are modulated by preparation. An fNIRS study. Neuroimage. 2008;39:600-607 (Pubitemid 350117629)
53. Suzuki M, Miyai I, Ono T, et al. Prefrontal and premotor cortices are involved in adapting walking and running speed on the treadmill: an optical imaging study. Neuroimage. 2004;23:1020-1026 (Pubitemid 39446534)
54. Mihara M, Miyai I, Hatakenaka M, Kubota K, Sakoda S. Sustained prefrontal activation during ataxic gait: a compensatory mechanism for ataxic stroke? Neuroimage. 2007;37:1338-1345 (Pubitemid 47385280)
55. Miyai I, Yagura H, Oda I, et al. Premotor cortex is involved in restoration of gait in stroke. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:188-194 (Pubitemid 34810599)
56. Duschau-Wicke A, von Zitzewitz J, Caprez A, Lunenburger L, Riener R. Path control: a method for patient-cooperative robot-aided gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18:38-48
57. Cui X, Bray S, Reiss AL. Speeded near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) response detection. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e15474
58. Sitaram R, Caria A, Veit R, et al. FMRI brain-computer interface: a tool for neuroscientific research and treatment. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2007:25487
59. Caria A, Sitaram R, Birbaumer N. Real-time fMRI: a tool for local brain regulation. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:487-501
60. Fazli S, Mehnert J, Steinbrink J, et al. Enhanced performance by a hybrid NIRS-EEG brain computer interface. Neuroimage. 2012;59:519-529
61. Mihara M, Miyai I, Hattori N, et al. Neurofeedback using real-time near-infrared spectroscopy enhances motor imagery related cortical activation. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32234
62. Sitaram R, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Hemodynamic brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation. Neural Netw. 2009;22:1320-1328
63. Sorger B, Reithler J, Dahmen B, Goebel R. A real-time fMRIbased spelling device immediately enabling robust motorindependent communication. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1333-1338
64. Chiew M, LaConte SM, Graham SJ. Investigation of fMRI neurofeedback of differential primary motor cortex activity using kinesthetic motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2012;61:21-31.