Decision making for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices there was no choice versus i thought about it an awful lot

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 374-380

  Mcilvennan, Colleen K ^a   Allen, Larry A ^a   Nowels, Carolyn ^b   Brieke, Andreas ^a   Cleveland, Joseph C ^c   Matlock, Daniel D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Division of General Internal Medicine   (United States)

^c Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Destination therapy; Heart failure; Heart assist devices; Patient centered care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DESTINATION THERAPY; DEVICE INFECTION; DEVICE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; MALE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; THERAPY; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84903558314     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000729     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Miller LW, Guglin M. Patient selection for ventricular assist devices: a moving target. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1209-1221.
2. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W, Long JW, Ascheim DD, Tierney AR, Levitan RG, Watson JT, Meier P, Ronan NS, Shapiro PA, Lazar RM, Miller LW, Gupta L, Frazier OH, Desvigne-Nickens P, Oz MC, Poirier VL; Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435-1443.
3. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, Sun B, Tatooles AJ, Delgado RM III, Long JW, Wozniak TC, Ghumman W, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH; HeartMate II Investigators. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241-2251.
4. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG, Miller LW, Sun B, Russell SD, Starling RC, Chen L, Boyle AJ, Chillcott S, Adamson RM, Blood MS, Camacho MT, Idrissi KA, Petty M, Sobieski M, Wright S, Myers TJ, Farrar DJ; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(4 suppl):S1-S39.
5. Flint KM, Matlock DD, Lindenfeld J, Allen LA. Frailty and the selection of patients for left ventricular assist device. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:286-293.
6. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared Decision-Making in Health Care. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.
7. Goldstein NE, Back AL, Morrison RS. Titrating guidance: a model to guide physicians assisting patients and families facing complex decisions. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1733-1739.
8. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
9. University of Ottawa. Ottawa Decision Support Framework. 2010. Available at: http://decisionaid.Ohri.Ca/docs/develop/odsf.Pdf. Accessed June 2, 2012.
10. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:21-43. (Pubitemid 127473357)
11. Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:281-292. (Pubitemid 36899094)
12. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102-114. (Pubitemid 43143304)
13. Friese S. ATLAS.ti 7 User Manual. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2012.
14. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237-246.
15. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
16. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2010;5:80-92.
17. Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, Stewart D, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review form: qualitative studies (version 2.0). Available at: http://www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/.2007. Accessed June 14, 2012.
18. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
19. Allen LA, Stevenson LW, Grady KL, Goldstein NE, Matlock DD, Arnold RM, Cook NR, Felker GM, Francis GS, Hauptman PJ, Havranek EP, Krumholz HM, Mancini D, Riegel B, Spertus JA; American Heart Association; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1928-1952.
20. Bakitas M, Kryworuchko J, Matlock DD, Volandes AE. Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness. J Palliat Med. 2011;14:1109-1116.
21. Rizzieri AG, Verheijde JL, Rady MY, McGregor JL. Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008;3:20.
22. Pollak KI, Arnold RM, Jeffreys AS, Alexander SC, Olsen MK, Abernethy AP, Sugg Skinner C, Rodriguez KL, Tulsky JA. Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5748-5752.
23. Kahneman D. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
24. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Persp. 1991;5:193-206.
25. Gawronski B, Strack F, eds. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012.