Design and implementation of dynamically evolving ensembles with the helena framework

Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 15-24

  Klarl, Annabelle ^a   Hennicker, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Algebraic Metamodel; Ensemble based Software Engineering; Framework Development

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATA THEORY;

COMPLEX DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR; COMPONENT BASED APPROACH; COMPONENT-BASED DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; ENSEMBLE-BASED SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT; META MODEL; SYSTEMATIC METHODOLOGY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84903548835     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASWEC.2014.26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Hennicker and A. Klarl, "Foundations for Ensemble Modeling-The Helena Approach," in Specification, Algebra, and Software: A Festschrift Symposium in Honor of Kokichi Futatsugi (SAS 2014). LNCS, to appear 2014, preliminary version available at http://www. pst. ifi. lmu. de/Personen/team/ klarl/papers/sas2014. pdf.
2. J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, "The vision of autonomic computing," Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41-50, Jan. 2003.
3. M. Weiser, "The computer for the 21st century," SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 3-11, Jul. 1999.
4. "The ASCENS Project. " [Online]. Available: http://www. ascens-ist. eu
5. M. Wirsing, M. Hölzl, M. Tribastone, and F. Zambonelli, "ASCENS: Engineering Autonomic Service-Component Ensembles," in Formal Methods for Components and Objects, 10th International Symposium, FMCO 2011, ser. LNCS. Springer.
6. A. van Lamsweerde, Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, 2009.
7. D. Abeywickrama, N. Bicocchi, and F. Zambonelli, "SOTA: Towards a General Model for Self-Adaptive Systems," in 21st IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises. Toulouse: IEEE CS Press, 2012, pp. 48-53.
8. C. Szyperski, Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2002.
9. A. Rausch, R. Reussner, R. Mirandola, and F. Plasil, Eds., The Common Component Modeling Example: Comparing Software Component Models, ser. LNCS, vol. 5153. Springer, 2008.
10. "The Helena Framework. " [Online]. Available: http://www. pst. ifi. lmu. de/Personen/team/klarl/helena
11. G. Gottlob, M. Schrefl, and B. Röck, "Extending Object-Oriented Systems with Roles," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 268-296, 1996.
12. B. B. Kristensen and K. Østerbye, "Roles: Conceptual Abstraction Theory and Practical Language Issues," TAPOS, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 143-160, 1996.
13. F. Steimann, "On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling," Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 83-106, 2000.
14. -, " Formale Modellierung mit Rollen," Habilitation Thesis, Universität Hannover, 2000.
15. S. Herrmann, "Object teams: Improving modularity for crosscutting collaborations," in Revised Papers from the International Conference NetObjectDays on Objects, Components, Architectures, Services, and Applications for a Networked World, ser. NODe '02. London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 248-264.
16. M. Baldoni, U. Studi, and T. Italy, "Interaction between Objects in powerJava," Journal of Object Technology, vol. 6, pp. 7-12, 2007.
17. T. Reenskaug, Working with objects: the OOram Framework Design Principles. Manning Publications, Greenwich, CT, 1996.
18. E. P. Andersen, " Conceptual Modeling of Objects-A Role Modeling Approach," Ph. D. dissertation, University of Oslo, 1997.
19. M. Coppo, M. Dezani-Ciancaglini, L. Padovani, and N. Yoshida, "Inference of global progress properties for dynamically interleaved multiparty sessions," in COORDINATION, 2013, pp. 45-59.