Patterns of response to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the image

NeuroImage

Volumn 99, Issue , 2014, Pages 402-410

  Watson, David M ^a   Hartley, Tom ^a   Andrews, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FMRI; MVPA; PPA; Scenes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; ENVIRONMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903540204     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.045     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Environmental knowledge is subserved by separable dorsal/ventral neural areas. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:2512-2518.
2. Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 1999, 122:1613-1628.
3. Arcaro M.J., McMains S.A., Singer B.D., Kastner S. Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10638-10652.
4. Dilks D.D., Julian J.B., Paunov A.M., Kanwisher N. The occipital place area is causally and selectively involved in scene perception. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:1331-1336.
5. Epstein R.A. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:388-396.
6. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
7. Greene M.R., Oliva A. The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:464-472.
8. Grill-Spector K. The neural basis of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13:159-166.
9. Hanke M., Halchenko Y.O., Sederberg P.B., Hanson S.J., Haxby J.V., Pollmann S. PyMVPA: a python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data. Neuroinformatics 2009, 7:37-53.
10. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M., Furey M., Ishai A., Schouten J., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
11. Haxby J.V., Guntupalli J.S., Connolly A.C., Halchenko Y.O., Conroy B.R., Gobbini M.I., Hanke M., Ramadge P.J. A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron 2011, 72:404-416.
12. Joubert O.R., Rousselet G.A., Fize D., Fabre-Thorpe M. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vis. Res. 2007, 47:3286-3297.
13. Kravitz D.J., Peng C.S., Baker C.I. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7322-7333.
14. Kriegeskorte N., Goebel R., Bandettini P. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:3863-3868.
15. Maguire E. The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. Scand. J. Psychol. 2001, 42:225-238.
16. Mendez M.F., Cherrier M.M. Agnosia for scenes in topographagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1387-1395.
17. Nasr S., Tootell R.B.H. A cardinal orientation bias in scene-selective visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:14921-14926.
18. Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2001, 42:145-175.
19. Park S., Brady T.F., Greene M.R., Oliva A. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1333-1340.
20. Poldrack R.A., Halchenko Y.O., Hanson S.J. Decoding the large-scale structure of brain function by classifying mental states across individuals. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:1364-1372.
21. Potter M.C. Meaning in visual search. Science 1975, 187:965-966.
22. Rajimehr R., Devaney K.J., Bilenko N.Y., Young J.C., Tootell R.B.H. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000608.
23. Shinkareva S.V., Mason R.A., Malave V.L., Wang W., Mitchell T.M., Just M.A. Using FMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS One 2008, 3:e1394.
24. Torralba A., Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 2003, 14:391-412.
25. Torralbo A., Walther D.B., Chai B., Caddigan E., Fei-Fei L., Beck D.M. Good exemplars of natural scene categories elicit clearer patterns than bad exemplars but not greater BOLD activity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e58594.
26. Walther D.B., Caddigan E., Fei-Fei L., Beck D.M. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10573-10581.
27. Walther D.B., Chai B., Caddigan E., Beck D.M., Fei-Fei L. Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:9661-9666.
28. Willenbockel V., Sadr J., Fiset D., Horne G.O., Gosselin F., Tanaka J.W. Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox. Behav. Res. Methods 2010, 42:671-684.