Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: A componential analysis

Brain

Volumn 137, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1971-1985

  Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a   Shapiro, Allison D ^a   Coslett, H Branch ^b  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

action; apraxia; gesture; imitation; tools

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BODY POSTURE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; IMITATION; KINEMATICS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; NEUROANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL GYRUS; VOXEL BASED LESION SYMPTOM MAPPING; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; ACCURACY; ARM; BRAIN MAPPING; FRONTAL LOBE; HAND; MIDDLE AGED; PARIETAL LOBE; STROKE PATIENT; TOOL USE; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTION; APRAXIA; GESTURE; IMITATION; TOOLS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GESTURES; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84903537667     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu111     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Agnew ZK, Wise RJ, Leech R. Dissociating object directed and nonobject directed action in the human mirror system: Implications for theories of motor simulation. PloS One 2012; 7: e32517.
2. Almeida J, Fintzi AR, Mahon BZ. Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway. Cortex 2013; 49: 2334-44.
3. Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
4. Assmus A, Giessing C, Weiss PH, Fink GR. Functional interactions during the retrieval of conceptual action knowledge: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 1004-12. (Pubitemid 46849735)
5. Astafiev SV, Stanley CM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 542-8. (Pubitemid 38544594)
6. Beauchamp MS. See me, hear me, touch me: multisensory integration in lateral occipital-temporal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15: 145-53. (Pubitemid 41569262)
7. Beauchamp MS, Martin A. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: Evidence from fmri studies of tools. Cortex 2007; 43: 461-8. (Pubitemid 46744683)
8. Binkofski F, Buxbaum LJ. Two action systems in the human brain. Brain Lang 2013; 127: 222-9.
9. Bohlhalter S, Vanbellingen T, Bertschi M, Wurtz P, Cazzoli D, Nyffeler T, et al. Interference with gesture production by theta burst stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 1197-202.
10. Borroni B, Garibotto V, Agosti C, Brambati SM, Bellelli G, Gasparotti R, et al. White matter changes in corticobasal degeneration syndrome and correlation with limb apraxia. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 796-801. (Pubitemid 351831458)
11. Bracci S, Peelen MV. Body and object effectors: the organization of object representations in high-level visual cortex reflects body-object interactions. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 18247-58.
12. Brayanov JB, Press DZ, Smith MA. Motor memory is encoded as a gainfield combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 14951-65.
13. Buxbaum LJ. Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase 2001; 7: 445-58. (Pubitemid 34139890)
14. Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2005b; 43: 917-29. (Pubitemid 40248899)
15. Buxbaum LJ, Kalenine S. Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1191: 201-18.
16. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle K, Grossman M, Coslett HB. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007; 43: 411-23. (Pubitemid 46744681)
17. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle KM, Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled objectrelated actions in humans. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005a; 25: 226-39. (Pubitemid 41278500)
18. Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. Ale meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 2010; 50: 1148-67.
19. Crosson B, Sadek JR, Maron L, Gokcay D, Mohr CM, Auerbach EJ, et al. Relative shift in activity from medial to lateral frontal cortex during internally versus externally guided word generation. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13: 272-83. (Pubitemid 32209768)
20. Cubelli R, Marchetti C, Boscolo G, Della Sala S. Cognition in action: testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain Cogn 2000; 44: 144-65.
21. Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 2668-84. (Pubitemid 44511945)
22. Dilkina K, Lambon Ralph MA. Conceptual structure within and between modalities. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6: 333.
23. Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001; 293: 2470-3. (Pubitemid 32917331)
24. Downing PE, Peelen MV, Wiggett AJ, Tew BD. The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception. Soc Neurosci 2006; 1: 52-62.
25. Fletcher PC, Henson RN. Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain 2001; 124: 849-81. (Pubitemid 32458500)
26. Gallivan JP, Chapman CS, McLean DA, Flanagan JR, Culham JC. Activity patterns in the category-selective occipitotemporal cortex predict upcoming motor actions. Eur J Neurosci 2013; 38: 2408-24.
27. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 870-78. (Pubitemid 34852500)
28. Goldenberg G. Imitating getures and manipulating a mannikin-The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 63-72.
29. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 1449-59.
30. Goldenberg G. Apraxia in left-handers. Brain 2013; 136: 2592-601.
31. Goldenberg G, Hagmann S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: a study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 333-41. (Pubitemid 27090812)
32. Goldenberg G, Hentze S, Hermsdorfer J. The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia. Neurology 2004; 63: 1863-67. (Pubitemid 39532382)
33. Goldenberg G, Hermsdorfer J, Glindemann R, Rorden C, Karnath HO. Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2007a; 17: 2769-76. (Pubitemid 350129436)
34. Goldenberg G, Hermsdorfer J, Glindemann R, Rorden C, Karnath HO. Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2007b; 17: 2769-76. (Pubitemid 350129436)
35. Goldrick M, Rapp B. Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition 2007; 102: 219-60. (Pubitemid 44917947)
36. Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Ochipa C, Heilman KM. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cogn Neuropsychol 1991; 8: 443-58.
37. Groh-Bordin C, Glocker D, Bittl P, Keller I, Preger R, Hildebrandt H, et al. Scanning your body is different from performing body movements: a double dissociation between body representational neglect and apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 1187-92.
38. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT. Spatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia: a kinematic analysis of aiming movements. Brain 1999; 122: 1169-82. (Pubitemid 29533131)
39. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT. Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 2000; 123: 2306-13.
40. Halsband U, Schmitt J, Weyers M, Binkofski F, Grutzner G, Freund HJ. Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: a perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 200-16. (Pubitemid 32036999)
41. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST. Repetition suppression for performed hand gestures revealed by fmri. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 2898-906.
42. Heilman K, Bowers D, Watson RT. Performance on a hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 1983; 33: 661-64. (Pubitemid 13080466)
43. Heilman KM, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. Apraxia. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, editors. Clinical Neuropsychology. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 141-50.
44. Hermsdoerfer J, Terlinden G, Muhlau M, Goldenberg G, Wohlschlager AM. Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fmri study. Neuroimage 2007; 36: T109-18. (Pubitemid 46702733)
45. Holmes CJ, Hoge R, Collins L, Woods R, Toga AW, Evans AL. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 324-33. (Pubitemid 28155214)
46. Huey ED, Pardini M, Cavanagh A, Wassermann EM, Kapogiannis D, Spina S, et al. Association of ideomotor apraxia with frontal gray matter volume loss in corticobasal syndrome. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 1274-80.
47. Jax SA, Buxbaum LJ, Moll AD. Deficits in movement planning and intrinsic coordinate control in ideomotor apraxia. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 2063-76. (Pubitemid 44913360)
48. Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 2005b; 15: 681-95. (Pubitemid 40703968)
49. Kable J, Lease-Spellmeyer J, Chatterjee A. Neural substrates of action event knowledge. J Cogn Neurosci 2002; 14: 795-805. (Pubitemid 34761800)
50. Kable JW, Kan IP, Wilson A, Thompson-Schill SL, Chatterjee A. Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 1855-70.
51. Kalenine S, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain 2010; 133: 3269-80.
52. Kalenine S, Peyrin C, Pichat C, Segebarth C, Bonthoux F, Baciu M. The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: a behavioral and fmri study. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 1152-62.
53. Kimberg D, Aguirre G, editors. Voxbo: A flexible architecture for functional neuroimaging. In: The Human Brain Project/NeuroInformatics Conference Abstract, Bethesda, MD; 2001.
54. Klatzky RL, McCloskey B, Doherty S, Pellegrino Jea. Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. J Motor Behav 1987; 19: 187-213.
55. Kolb B, Milner B. Performance of complex arm and facial movements after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 1981; 19: 491-503. (Pubitemid 11060628)
56. Kroliczak G, Frey SH. A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents familiar tool use pantomimes and communicative gestures. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 2396-410.
57. Lee CL, Middleton E, Mirman D, Kalenine S, Buxbaum LJ. Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2013; 39: 257-70.
58. Liepmann H. Das krankheitsbild der apraxie. Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol 1900; 8: 102-32, 82-97.
59. Mahon BZ, Kumar N, Almeida J. Spatial frequency tuning reveals interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems. J Cogn Neurosci 2013; 25: 862-71.
60. Manuel AL, Radman N, Mesot D, Chouiter L, Clarke S, Annoni JM, et al. Inter- and intrahemispheric dissociations in ideomotor apraxia: a largescale lesion-symptom mapping study in subacute brain-damaged patients. Cereb Cortex 2013; 23: 2781-9.
61. McNorgan C, Kotack RA, Meehan DC, McRae K. Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object concepts. Mem Cognit 2007; 35: 418-31. (Pubitemid 47057969)
62. Mengotti P, Ticini LF, Waszak F, Schutz-Bosbach S, Rumiati RI. Imitating others' actions: transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal opercula reveals the processes underlying automatic imitation. Europ J Neurosci 2013; 37: 316-22.
63. Menz MM, McNamara A, Klemen J, Binkofski F. Dissociating networks of imitation. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 3339-50.
64. Molenberghs P, Brander C, Mattingley JB, Cunnington R. The role of the superior temporal sulcus and the mirror neuron system in imitation. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1316-26.
65. Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB. Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fmri studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012; 36: 341-9.
66. Muhlau M, Hermsdorfer J, Goldenberg G, Wohlschlager AM, Castrop F, Stahl R, et al. Left inferior parietal dominance in gesture imitation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 1086-98. (Pubitemid 40349606)
67. Nagel IE, Schumacher EH, Goebel R, D'Esposito M. Functional mri investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 2008; 43: 801-7.
68. Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline JB. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 2005; 25: 653-60. (Pubitemid 40461704)
69. Orban de Xivry JJ, Marko MK, Pekny SE, Pastor D, Izawa J, Celnik P, et al. Stimulation of the human motor cortex alters generalization patterns of motor learning. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 7102-10.
70. Orlov T, Makin TR, Zohary E. Topographic representation of the human body in the occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 2010; 68: 586-600.
71. Parmar PN, Huang FC, Patton JL. Simultaneous coordinate representations are influenced by visual feedback in a motor learning task. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; 2011: 6762-8.
72. Peeters RR, Rizzolatti G, Orban GA. Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region. Neuroimage 2013; 78: 83-93.
73. Petreska B, Adriani M, Blanke O, Billard AG. Apraxia: a review. Prog Brain Res 2007; 164: 61-83. (Pubitemid 47494688)
74. Pisella L, Binkofski F, Lasek K, Toni I, Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 2734-48. (Pubitemid 44540203)
75. Ramayya AG, Glasser MF, Rilling JK. A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 507-16.
76. Ridderinkhof KR, van den Wildenberg WP, Segalowitz SJ, Carter CS. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn 2004; 56: 129-40. (Pubitemid 39423876)
77. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 2003; 153: 146-57. (Pubitemid 37445307)
78. Rorden C, Karnath H-O, Bonilha L. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 1081-88. (Pubitemid 47026498)
79. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 2001; 108: 709-34. (Pubitemid 33604143)
80. Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cog Neuropsychol 1991; 1991: 443-58.
81. Rothi LJG, Raymer AM, Ochipa C, Maher LM, Greenwald ML, Heilman KM. Florida Apraxia Battery. 1992.
82. Rowe JB, Passingham RE. Working memory for location and time: activity in prefrontal area 46 relates to selection rather than maintenance in memory. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 77-86. (Pubitemid 32552745)
83. Roy EA, Square PA. Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In: Roy EA, editor. Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985.
84. Rumiati RI, Humphreys GW. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998; 24: 631-47. (Pubitemid 128455634)
85. Schnur TT, Schwartz MF, Kimberg DY, Hirshorn E, Coslett HB, Thompson-Schill SL. Localizing interference during naming: convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of broca's area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 322-7.
86. Schumacher EH, D'Esposito M. Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 193-201. (Pubitemid 35253492)
87. Schumacher EH, Elston PA, D'Esposito M. Neural evidence for representation- specific response selection. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 1111-21. (Pubitemid 37487386)
88. Steinthal P. Abriss der sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Harrwitz und Gossmann; 1871.
89. Su MC, Zhao YX, Huang H, Chen HF. A fuzzy rule-based approach to recognizing 3-d arm movements. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001; 9: 191-201. (Pubitemid 33035533)
90. Sunderland A, Wilkins L, Dineen R, Dawson SE. Tool-use and the left hemisphere: what is lost in ideomotor apraxia? Brain Cogn 2013; 81: 183-92.
91. Tessari A, Canessa N, Ukmar M, Rumiati RI. Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain 2007; 130: 1111-26. (Pubitemid 47355592)
92. Thompson-Schill SL, D'Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 14792-7. (Pubitemid 28041453)
93. Thompson-Schill SL, Swick D, Farah MJ, D'Esposito M, Kan IP, Knight RT. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 15855-60. (Pubitemid 29018790)
94. Tranel D, Kemmerer D, Adolphs R, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cogn Neuropsychol 2003; 20: 409-32. (Pubitemid 36889815)
95. Tremblay P, Gracco VL. Contribution of the frontal lobe to externally and internally specified verbal responses: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage 2006; 33: 947-57. (Pubitemid 44739998)
96. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in spm using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the mni mri single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 273-89. (Pubitemid 34852226)
97. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Manfield RJW, editors. Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982.
98. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1832-43.
99. Walker GM, Schwartz MF, Kimberg DY, Faseyitan O, Brecher A, Dell GS, et al. Support for anterior temporal involvement in semantic error production in aphasia: new evidence from VLSM. Brain Lang 2011; 117: 110-22.
100. Wallentin M, Nielsen AH, Vuust P, Dohn A, Roepstorff A, Lund TE. Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. Neuroimage 2011; 58: 963-73.
101. Watson CE, Chatterjee A. The functional neuroanatomy of actions. Neurology 2011; 76: 1428-34.
102. Watson CE, Chatterjee A. A bilateral frontoparietal network underlies visuospatial analogical reasoning. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2831-8.
103. Watson CE, Cardillo ER, Ianni GR, Chatterjee A. Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 2013; 25: 1191-205.
104. Watson JD, Myers R, Frackowiak RS, Hajnal JV, Woods RP, Mazziotta JC, et al. Area v5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 1993; 3: 79-94. (Pubitemid 23100833)
105. Weiss PH, Dohle C, Binkofski F, Schnitzler A, Freund HJ, Hefter H. Motor impairment in patients with parietal lesions: disturbances of meaningless arm movement sequences. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 397-405. (Pubitemid 32065805)