A new methodology for allocating road space for public transport priority

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

Volumn 75, Issue , 2004, Pages 375-388

  Currie, G ^a   Sarvi, M ^a   Young, W ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bus priority; Public transport priority; Road space allocation; Road space management; Traffic planning; Travel reliability

Indexed keywords

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; ROADS AND STREETS;

BUS PRIORITY; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SPACE ALLOCATION; SPACE MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC PLANNING;

HIGHWAY PLANNING;

EID: 84903458185     PISSN: 17433509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Vuchic V R (1981) Urban Public Transportation: Systems and Technology. (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA).
2. Black J A Lim P N and Kim G H (1992) A Traffic Model for the Optimal Allocation of Arterial Roadspace: A Case Study of Seoul's First Experimental Bus Lane Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol 16 pp 195-207.
3. Sparks G A and May A D A (1971) Mathematical Model for Evaluation Priority Lane Operations on Freeways Highway Research Record 363 pp 27-42.
4. Jepson F. and Ferreira L. (1999) Assessing Travel Time Impacts Of Measures To Enhance Bus Operations Road & Transport Research Vol 8 No 4 Dec 1999 pp 41-54.
5. Radwan A E and Benevelli S A (1983) Bus Priority Strategy: Justification and Environmental Aspects Journal of Transportation Engineering Vol 109 pp 88-106.
6. Oldfield R H Bly PH and Webster F V (1977) With-Flow Bus Lanes: Economic Justification Using a Theorectical Model Transport and Road Research Laboratory LR 809, 1977.
7. Delgoffe L (1973) Guidelines for Improving the Transit of Street Level Public Transport in Towns UITP Review March 1973.
8. Levinson H S Adams C L and Hoey W F (1975) Bus Use of Highways-Planning and Design Guidelines NCHRP Program Report 155 Transport Research Board, Washington, DC.
9. The Department of Environment Transport and the Regions (1997) Keeping Buses Moving-A guide to traffic management to assist buses in urban areas Local Transport Note 1/97 London the Stationary Office.
10. Currie G V Sarvi M Young W (2004) A Comprehensive Approach to Balanced Road Space Allocation in Relation to Transit Priority Paper presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
11. Department of Infrastructure (2003). Investment Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines. Department of Infrastructure, Melbourne, Australia 2002.
12. Abkowitz M D (1981) Understanding the Effect of Transit Service Reliability on Work Travel Behaviour TRR 794, pp33-41
13. Ryan A (1996) The Value of Time London Transport Research Note M (96).
14. Kjoerstad K N and Renolen H (1996) Passenger Valuation of Time and Service Improvements PTRC European Transport Forum 2-6 Sept 1996.
15. Jansson K (1994) Valuation of Travel Time and Information Paper to PTRC SAM Seminar G 1994.
16. Booz Allen Hamilton (2000) Valuation of Public Transport Attributes Final Report to Transfund New Zealand Research programme 1999-2000.
17. Ogden, K and Stanley, J. (2001) Internal Cost Estimates to DoI including Internal Review by Ashley (2001).