Where is the political? Insurgent mobilisations and the incipient "return of the political"

Space and Polity

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 122-136

  Swyngedouw, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

democracy; insurgent cities; political space; post politicisation

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; DEMOCRATIZATION; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; POLITICAL PROCESS; POLITICAL THEORY;

EID: 84903451740     PISSN: 13562576     EISSN: 14701235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2013.879774     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abensour, M. (2011). Democracy against the state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Agamben, G. (2006). Metropolis. Paper presented at conference Metropoli/Moltitudine seminario nomade in tre atti, Venice. Retrieved from http://www.egs.edu/faculty/giorgio-agamben/articles/metropolis/ - accessed 23 January 2014.
4. Agamben, G. (2007). Qu'est-ce qu'un dispositif? Paris: Rivages Poche.
5. Ahrendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Publishers Ltd College Publishers.
6. Badiou, A. (1998). La organisatiom politique 28(2).
7. Badiou, A. (2007). The century. Cambridge: Polity.
8. Badiou, A. (2008). The communist hypothesis. New Left Review, 49 (Jan/Feb), 29-42.
9. Badiou, A. (2010). The communist hypothesis. London: Verso.
10. Badiou, A. (2011). Le réveil de l'histoire. Paris: Nouvelles Editions Lignes.
11. Badiou, A. (2012). The reawakening of history. London: Verso.
12. Balibar, E. (2010). La proposition de l'egaliberte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
13. Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Bosteels, B. (2011). The actuality of communism. London: Verso.
15. Crouch, C. (2000). Coping with post-democracy. Fabian Ideas 598. London: The Fabian Society.
16. Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Dean, J. (2012). The communist horizon. London: Verso.
18. Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A, 33, 1785-1805. doi: 10.1068/a3467
19. Dikeç, M. (2005). Space, politics and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 171-188. doi: 10.1068/d364t
20. Douzinas, C., & Žižek, S. (Eds.). (2010). The idea of communism. London: Verso.
21. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: The Free Press.
22. Hallward, P. (2003a). Badiou - a subject to truth. Minnepolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Hallward, P. (2003b). Introduction - jacques rancière - politics and aesthetics - an interview. Angelaki, 8(2), 191-193. doi: 10.1080/0969725022000032436
24. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012, January 11). The fight for 'real democracy' at the heart of occupy wall street. Foreign Affairs.
25. Le Galès, P. (2002). Cities: Social conflict and governance. Oxford: University Press.
26. Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society: Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. Lefort, C. (1994). L'invention démocratique: Les limites de la domination totalitaire. Paris: Fayard.
28. Lefort, C. (2000). Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29. Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49-64. doi: 10.1080/089356902101242288
30. Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought. Edinburgh: University Press.
31. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political, thinking in action. London: Routledge.
32. Rakodi, C. (2003). Politics and performance: The implication of emerging governance arrangements for urban management approaches and information systems. Habitat International, 27(4), 523-547. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00004-3
33. Rancière, J. (1994). Post-democracy, politics and philosophy: An interview with jacques rancière. Angelaki, 1(3), 171-178.
34. Rancière, J. (1995). Politics, identification, and subjectivization. In J. Rajchman (Ed.), The identity in question (pp. 63-70). New York: Routledge.
35. Rancière, J. (1998). Disagreement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Rancière, J. (2000a). Le partage du sensible: Esthétique et politique. Paris: La Fabrique.
37. Rancière, J. (2000b). Dissenting words. a conversation with jacques rancière (with davide panagia). Diacritics, 30(2), 113-126. doi: 10.1353/dia.2000.0016
38. Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3). Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html
39. Rancière, J. (2003a). Politics and aesthetics: An interview. Angelaki 8(2), 194-211.
40. Rancière, J. (2003b). Comment and responses. Theory & Event, 6(4). Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/theory_and_event/v006/6.4ranciere.html
41. Rancière, J. (2003c). The thinking of dissensus: Politics and aesthetics. In Fidelity to the disagreement: Jacques rancière and the political. Goldsmith's College: Post-Structuralism and Radical Politics and Marxism specialist groups of the Political Studies Association of the UK.
42. Rancière, J. (2006a). Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.
43. Rancière, J. (2006b). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.
44. Ricoeur, P. (1965). The political paradox. In P. Ricoeur (Ed.) History and truth (pp. 247-270). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
45. Robson, M. (2005). Introduction: Hearing voices. Paragraph, 28(1), 1-12. doi: 10.3366/para.2005.28.1.1
46. Rosanvallon, P. (2006). Democracy past and future. New York: Columbia University Press.
47. Schmitter, P. (2002). Participation in governance arrangements: is there any reason to expect it will achieve 'sustainable and innovative policies in a multi-level context'? In J. Grote & B. Gbipki (Eds.), Participatory governance: Political and societal implications (pp. 51-69). Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
48. Srnicek, N. (2008). What is to be done? alain badiou and the pre-evental. Symposium, 12(2), 110-126. doi: 10.5840/symposium200812229
49. Stoker, G. (1998). Public - private partnerships in urban governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Partnerships in urban governance: European and american experience (pp. 34-51). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
50. Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 63-76. doi: 10.1068/d9s
51. Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1-16. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279869
52. Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the post-political city - in search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(3), 601-620.
53. st century. Antipode, 41(6), 1439-60.
54. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democracy: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political geography 30, 370-80. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.001
55. World Economic Forum. (2012). Global risks 2012. 7th ed. Geneva: Risk Response Network.
56. Žižek, S. (2002a). Revolution at the gates - žižek on lenin - the 1917 writings. London: Verso.
57. Žižek, S. (2002b). Welcome to the desert of the real. London: Verso.
58. Žižek, S. (2008). Violence. London: Profile Books.
59. Žižek, S. (2012). The year of dreaming dangerously. London: Verso.