Selfing, adaptation and background selection in finite populations

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1360-1371

  Kamran Disfani, A ^a   Agrawal, A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Beneficial and deleterious mutations; Hill Robertson effects; Recombination; Selfing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AUTOGAMY; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

ADAPTATION; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MUTATION; STATISTICS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MUTATION; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84903449993     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12343     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abbott, R.J. & Gomes, M.F. 1989. Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Heredity 62: 411-418.
2. Agrawal, A.F. & Lively, C.M. 2001. Parasites and the evolution of self-fertilization. Evolution 55: 869-879.
3. Agrawal, A.F. & Whitlock, M.C. 2010. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 450-458.
4. Barriere, A. & Felix, M.A. 2005. High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr. Biol. 15: 1176-1184.
5. Barton, N.H. 1995. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics 140: 821-841.
6. Barton, N.H. & Otto, S.P. 2005. Evolution of recombination due to random drift. Genetics 169: 2353-2370.
7. Bataillon, T. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet. Res. 75: 75-81.
8. Bell, G. 1982. The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press, Berkley.
9. Bomblies, K., Yant, L., Laitinen, R.A., Kim, S.T., Hollister, J.D., Warthmann, N. et al. 2010. Local-scale patterns of genetic variability, outcrossing, and spatial structure in natural stands of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000890.
10. Caballero, A. & Hill, W.G. 1992. Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics 131: 493-507.
11. Campbell, R.B. 1986. The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theor. Popul. Biol. 30: 232-244.
12. Charlesworth, B. 1980. The cost of sex in relation to mating system. J. Theor. Biol. 84: 655-671.
13. Charlesworth, B. 2012. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites. Genetics 190: 5-22.
14. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
15. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74: 329-340.
16. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M.T. & Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: 1469-1489.
17. Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M.T. & Charlesworth, D. 1991. Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial self-fertilization. Genet. Res. 57: 177-194.
18. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M.T. & Charlesworth, B. 1992. The effect of linkage and population size on inbreeding depression due to mutational load. Genet. Res. 59: 49-61.
19. Crow, J.F. & Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis.
20. Cutter, A.D. 2006. Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 172: 171-184.
21. David, J.L., Savy, Y. & Brabant, P. 1993. Outcrossing and selfing evolution in populations under directional selection. Heredity 71: 642-651.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1974. Evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
23. Fisher, R.A. 1941. Average excess and the avergae effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11: 53-63.
24. Glémin, S. & Ronfort, J. 2013. Adaptation and maladaptation in selfing and outcrossing species: new mutations versus standing variation. Evolution 67: 225-240.
25. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C.G. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 47-79.
26. Gordo, I. & Campos, P.R.A. 2008. Sex and deleterious mutations. Genetics 179: 621-626.
27. Hartfield, M., Otto, S.P. & Keightley, P.D. 2010. The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier. Genetics 184: 1153-U464.
28. Hill, W.G. & Robertson A. 1966. Effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
29. Holsinger, K.E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating-system evolution. Evolution 42: 1235-1244.
30. Holsinger, K.E. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. Am. Nat. 138: 606-622.
31. Holsinger, K.E., Feldman, M.W. & Christiansen, F.B. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. Am. Nat. 124: 446-453.
32. Hudson, R.R. & Kaplan, N.L. 1995. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics 141: 1605-1617.
33. Iles, M.M., Walters, K. & Cannings, C. 2003. Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci. Genetics 165: 2249-2258.
34. Jarne, P. & Auld, J.R. 2006. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60: 1816-1824.
35. Johnston, M.O. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 102-3: 267-278.
36. Keightley, P.D. & Otto, S.P. 2006. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443: 89-92.
37. Kondrashov, A.S. 1985. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor II. Facultative apomixis and selfing. Genetics 111: 635-653.
38. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
39. Lloyd, D.G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
40. Lloyd, D.G. 1992. Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 370-380.
41. Long, T.A.F., Rowe, L. & Agrawal, A.F. 2013. The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 181: 532-544.
42. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Nagylaki, T. 1976. Model for evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. J. Theor. Biol. 58: 55-58.
44. Nordborg, M. 1997. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146: 1501-1514.
45. Nordborg, M., Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1996. The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. 67: 159-174.
46. Otto, S.P. & Feldman, M.W. 1997. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51: 134-147.
47. Porcher, E. & Lande, R. 2005. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 497-508.
48. Roze, D. 2009. Diploidy, population structure, and the evolution of recombination. Am. Nat. 174: S79-S94.
49. Roze, D. & Lenormand, T. 2005. Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination. Genetics 170: 841-857.
50. Slotte, T., Foxe, J.P., Hazzouri, K.M. & Wright, S.I. 2010. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 1813-1821.
51. Stebbins, G.L. 1957. Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am. Nat. 91: 337-354.
52. Uyenoyama, M.K. & Waller, D.M. 1991a. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation selection balance at one and two loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40: 14-46.
53. Uyenoyama, M.K. & Waller, D.M. 1991b. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. III. Homozygous lethal mutations at multiple loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40: 173-210.
54. de Visser, J.A.G.M. & Elena, S.F. 2007. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 139-149.
55. Wright, S.I., Kalisz, S. & Slotte, T. 2013. Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proc. R Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 280: 20130133.