Modelling and dynamic simulation of a supercritical, oxy combustion circulating fluidized bed power plant concept-Firing mode switching case

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 11-24

  Lappalainen, Jari ^a   Tourunen, Antti ^a   Mikkonen, Hannu ^a   Hänninen, Markku ^a   Kovács, Jenö ^b,c  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b Foster Wheeler Energia Oy   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Circulating fluidized bed; Dynamic process simulation; Firing mode switch; Modelling; Oxy combustion

Indexed keywords

BOILERS; CARBON CAPTURE; FLUE GASES; FLUES; FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; GASES; MODELS; OXYGEN; PHASE INTERFACES; STEAM POWER PLANTS; SWITCHING;

AIR SEPARATION UNIT; CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; DYNAMIC PROCESS SIMULATION; FIRING MODES; FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION; OPERATIONAL TRANSIENTS; OXY COMBUSTIONS;

FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBUSTION; FLUIDIZATION; FUEL; GAS FLOW; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; CONTROL SYSTEM; MODELING; POWER PLANT;

EID: 84903449670     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alobaid F., Ströhle J., Epple B., Kim H. Dynamic simulation of a supercritical once-through heat recovery steam generator during load changes and start-up procedures. Appl. Energy 2009, 86(7):1274-1282.
2. Apros. Available at: (accessed 24.02.14). http://www.apros.fi/en/.
3. 2 capture and purification unit for an oxy-coal-fired power plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 3(22):111-122.
4. Haryanto A., Hong K. Modeling and simulation of an oxy-fuel combustion boiler system with flue gas recirculation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35(1):25-40.
5. Hultgren M., Ikonen E., Kovács J. Oxidant control and air-oxy switching concepts for CFB furnace operation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2/11(61):203-219.
6. e oxy-fuel combustion power plant. 3rd Oxyfuel Combustion Conference 2013.
7. Kettunen A., Paljakka M. Process simulation in power plant design. Proceedings of SIMS 2006 the 47th conference on simulation and modelling 2006, 176-181.
8. 2 capture system-confirmation of oxy-combustion promises through pilot operation. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:917-924.
9. Kuczynski K.J., Fitzgerald F.D., Adams D., Glover F.H.M., White V., Chalmers H., et al. Dynamic modelling of oxyfuel power plant. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2541-2547.
10. Kunze C., Spliethoff H. Assessment of oxy-fuel, pre- and post-combustion-based carbon capture for future IGCC plants. Appl. Energy 2012, 6(94):109-116.
11. Lappalainen J., Myller T., Vehviläinen O., Tuuri S., Juslin K. Enhancing grade changes using dynamic simulation. TAPPI J., Online exclusive 2003, 2(12):13.
12. th CIUDEN oxy-CFB Boiler-first experiences. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:6179-6188.
13. Näveri J., Tahvonen T., Hakasaari P. Testing and utilization of Loviisa full scope apros model in engineering and development simulator. Proceedings of International Youth Nuclear Congress IYNC 2010.
14. e CFB boiler construction-first experience. VGB PowerTech 2010, 5:61.
15. Postler R., Epple B., Kluger F., Mönkert P., Heinz G. Dynamic process simulation model of an oxyfuel 250 MWel demonstration power plant. Oxyfuel Combustion Conference 2 2011.
16. Scheffknecht G., Al-Makhadmeh L., Schnell U., Maier J. Oxy-fuel coal combustion-a review of the current state-of-the-art. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 7(5 Supplement 1):S16-S35.
17. Silvennoinen E., Juslin K., Hänninen M., Tiihonen O., Kurki J., Porkholm K. The APROS software for process simulation and model development. VTT Res. Rep. 1989, 618:106-119.
18. Toftegaard M.B., Brix J., Jensen P.A., Glarborg P., Jensen A.D. Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 10(36(5)):581-625.
19. Vinson D.R. Air separation control technology. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2006, 30(10):1436-1446.
20. VTT Development of High-Efficiency CFB Technology to Provide Flexible Air/Oxy Operation for a Power Plant with CCS, Public Summary Report 2013.
21. 2-recovery type pulverized-coal fired power plant applied oxygen/recycled flue gas combustion. ASME-Publications-Fact 1999, 23:517-522.
22. Zapp P., Schreiber A., Marx J., Haines M., Hake J., Gale J. Overall environmental impacts of CCS technologies-a life cycle approach. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 5(8):12-21.