Benefits and unexpected artifacts of biplanar digital slot-scanning imaging in children

Pediatric Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 871-882

  Blumer, Steven L ^a   Dinan, David ^b   Grissom, Leslie E ^a  

^a NEMOURS ALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b NEMOURS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

ALARA; Children; Digital slot scanning system; Limb abnormalities; Orthopedics; Radiography; Scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIPLANAR DIGITAL SLOT SCANNING; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; LEG; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT; BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTIFACTS; BONE AND BONES; CHILD; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; HUMANS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84903437396     PISSN: 03010449     EISSN: 14321998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-2908-1     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Brenner DJ, Elliston ED, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289-296 (Pubitemid 32105628)
2. Seibert JA (2004) Tradeoffs between image quality and dose. Pediatr Radiol 34:S183-S195
3. Wade R (2013) A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D x-ray imaging system. Eur Spine J 22:296-304
4. Wybier M, Bossard P (2013) Musculoskeletal imaging in progress: the EOS imaging system. Joint Bone Spine 80:238-243
5. Deschenes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G et al (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patient radiation dose with a new slot-scanning x-ray imager. Spine 35:989-994
6. McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R et al (2012) EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 16:1-188
7. Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CWA, Schwab A et al (2013) Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort, and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skelet Radiol 42:959-967
8. Alison M, Ferrero E, Tanase AS et al. (2013) Ultra-low-dose imaging for the follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis: how low is reasonably achievable with new slot-scan technology? Program in Brief. RSNA 99th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, 1-6 Dec 2013, Chicago, IL
9. Illes T, Somoskeoy S (2012) The EOS imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice. Int Orthop 36:1324-1331
10. Morvan G,Mathieu P, Vuillemin V et al (2011) Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J 20:S602-S608
11. Daffner RH (1980) Visual illusions in computed tomography: phenomena related to Mach effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134:261-264