Analysis of Aerial Photography and Other Remotely Sensed Data

Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 135-170

  Gilvear, David ^a   Bryant, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D or quasi 3D reach scale channel morphology; Aerial photography; Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR); First generation satellite sensors; Floodplain morphology; Image analysis techniques; Laser altimetry; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; SAR interferometry

Indexed keywords

ANTENNAS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT; REMOTE SENSING;

FLOODPLAIN MORPHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; LASER ALTIMETRY; QUASI-3D; SAR INTERFEROMETRY; SATELLITE SENSORS;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY;

EID: 84903432522     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470868333.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Acornley, R.M., Cutler, M.E.J., Milton, E.J. andSear, D A. 1995. Detection andmapping salmonidspawning habitat in chalk streams using airborne remote sensing. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, Southampton, September 1995, pp. 267-274.
2. Aranuvachapun, S. andWalling, D.E. 1988. Landsat-MSS radiance as a measure of suspended sediment in the Lower Yellow River (Hwang Ho). Remote Sensing of Environment 25: 145-165.
3. Asrar, G. 1989. Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, New York: John Wiley andSons, 725 p.
4. Argialas, D.P., Lyon, J.G. andMintzer, O.W. 1988. Quantitative description and classification of drainage patterns. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54: 505-509.
5. Bale, A.J., Toucher, M.D., Weaver, R., Hudson, S.J. and Aiken, J. 1994. Laboratory measurements of the spectral properties of estuarine suspended particles. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 237-244.
6. Barton, I.J. andBathols, J.M. 1989. Monitoring floods with AVHRR. Remote Sensing of Environment 30: 27-35.
7. Bates, P.D. andDe Roo, A.P.J. 2000. A simple raster-based model for floodinundation simulation, Journal of Hydrology 236(1/2): 54-77.
8. Bierwirth, P.N., Lee, T.J. andBurne, R.V. 1993. Shallow sea-floor reflectance and water depth derived by unmixing multispectral imagery. PERS 59: 331-338.
9. Brackenridge, G.G., Tracy, B.T. and Know, J.C. 1994. Orbital SAR remote sensing for a floodwave. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 1439-1445.
10. Bryant, R.G. 1996. Validated linear mixture modelling of Landsat TM data for mapping evaporite minerals on a playa surface: methods and applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 405-412.
11. Bryant, R. andGilvear, D.J. 1999. Quantifying geomorphic andriparian landcover changes either side of a large flood event using airborne remote sensing: river Tay, Scotland, Geomorphology 23: 1-15.
12. Bryant, R., Tyler, A, Gilvear, D., McDonald, P., Teasdale, I., Brown, J. andFerrier, G. 1996. A preliminary investigation into the spectral characteristics of inter-tidal estu-arine sediments. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 405-112.
13. Brakenridge, G.R., Tracy, B.T. and Know, J.C. 1998. Orbital SAR remote sensing of a loodwave, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 1439-1445.
14. Butler, J.B., Lane S.N. andChandler, J.H. in press. Auto-matedextraction of grain-size data from gravel surfaces using digital image processing. Journal of Hydraulics Research.
15. Chandler, J.H. 1999. Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 51-63.
16. Christensen, E.J., Jensen, J.R., et al. 1988. Aircraft MSS data registration andvegetation classiication for wetland change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing 9: 23-38.
17. Clark, R.K., Fay, T.H. andWalker, C.L. 1987. Bathymetry calculations with Landsat 4TM imagery under a general-isedratio assumption. Appllied Optics 26: 4036-4038.
18. Cosandier, D., Ivanco, T.A., et al. 1994. The integration of a digital elevation model in CASI image geocorrection. In: Proceedings of the First International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, Strasbourg, France, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan (ERIM), pp. 515-529.
19. Cracknell, A.P. 1998. Synergy in remote sensing - what's in a pixel? International Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 2025-2047.
20. Cracknell, A.P. andHeyes L.W.B. 1993. Introduction to Remote Sensing, London: Taylor & Francis, 293 p.
21. Curran, P. 1994. Imaging Spectrometry. Progress in Physical Geography 18: 247-266.
22. Davidson, D.A., Watson, A. 1995. Spatial variability in soil moisture as predicted from airborne thematic mapper (ATM) data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 20: 219-230.
23. Dekker, T, Malthus, T. andHoogenboom, P. 1995. The remote sensing of inlandwater quality. In: Danson, F.M. andPlummer, S.E., eds., AdvancesinEnvironmentalRemote Sensing, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 123-143 (298 p.).
24. Devereux, B.J., Fuller, R.M., Carter, L., Parsell, R.J. 1990. Geometric correction of airborne scanner imagery by delauney triangles, International Journal of Remote Sensing 11: 2237-2251.
25. Diakite, M., Yerheau, M. andBonn, F. 1986. The utility of Landsat TM imagery in the inland delta cartography of Mali. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ERIM), Nairobi, pp. 567-574.
26. Dixon, L.F.J., Barker, R., Bray, M., Farres, P., Hooke, J., Inkpen, R., Merel, A., Payne, D. andShelford, A. 1998. Analytical photogrammetry for geomorphological research. In: Lane, S., Richards, K. and Chandler, J., eds., Landform Monitoring, Modelling and Analysis, Chi-chester: Wiley, pp. 63-49 (454 p.).
27. Ferguson, R.I. andWerritty, A. 1983. Bar development and channel changes in the gravelly River Feshie, Scotland. In: Collinson, J. andLewin, J., eds., Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems, Oxford: Blackwell Scientiic Publications, pp. 181-194.
28. Ferrier, G. 1995. A ieldstudy of the variability in the suspended sediment concentration-relectance relationship, International Journal of Remote Sensing 16: 2713-2720.
29. France, M.J., Collins, W.G. andChindeley, T.R. 1986. Extraction of hydrological parameters from Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ERIM), Nairobi, pp. 1165-1173.
30. Gardner, T.W., Connors, K.F., Hu, H. and Peterson, G.W. 1987. Delineation of ephemeral luvial networks on low-relief piedmont surfaces, Plutonium Valley, Nevada, USA. In: Spot-1, Image Utilisation, Assessment Results, Paris, CNES, pp. 215-220.
31. Garvin, J.B. andWilliams, R. 1993. Geodetic airborne laser altimetry of Breidamerkurjokull and Skeidararjokull, Ice-landand Jakobshavn, Greenland, Annals of Glaciology 17: 377-386.
32. Gilvear, D.J. andBlack, A. 1999. Floodinducedembank-ment failures on the river Tay: implications of climatically induced hydrological change in Scotland, Hydrological Sciences Journal 43: 1-16.
33. Gilvear, D.J., Waters, T. andMilner, A. 1995. Image analysis of aerial photography to quantify changes in channel morphology andinstream habitat following placer mining in interior Alaska. Freshwater Biology 44: 101-111.
34. Gilvear, DJ., Winterbottom, S.J. andSichingbula, H. 1999b. Character of meander planform change on the Luangwa River, Zambia, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16: 1-24.
35. Gomez, B., Mertes, L.A., Phillips, J.D., Milligan, F.J. and James, L.A. 1995. Sediment characteristics of an extreme flood: 1993 upper Mississippi River Valley. Geology 23: 963-966.
36. Gomez, B., Phillips, J.D., Milligan, F.J. andJames, L.A. 1997. Floodplain sedimentation and sensitivity: summer 1993 flood, Upper Mississippi River Valley. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 923-936.
37. Hardy, T.B. 1998. The future of habitat modelling and instream flow assessment techniques. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 405-120.
38. Hardy, T.B. and Shoemaker, J.A. 1995. Use of multi-spectral videography for spatial extrapolation of fisheries habitat use in the Comal River. In: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Colour Photography and Videography for Resource Assessment, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 154-163.
39. Hardy, T.B., Anderson, P.C., Neal, C.M.U., Stevens, D.K. 1994. Application of multispectral videography for the delineation of riverine depths and mesoscale hydraulic features. In: Effects on Human Induced Changes on Hydro-logic Systems, Paper and presentation at the American Water Resources Association, June 26-29, 1994, Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
40. Hickin, E.J. andNanson, G.C. 1975. Lateral migration rates of meandering rivers. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 110: 1557-1567.
41. Hooper, I.D. 1992. Relationships between vegetation and hydrogeomorphic characteristics of British riverine environments: a remotely sensedperspective. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton.
42. Irons, J.R., Weismiller, R.A. andPeterson, G.W. 1989. Soil reflectance. In: Asrar, G., ed., Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, New York: John Wiley andSons, pp. 336-428 (Chapter 3).
43. Izenberg, N.R., Arvidson, R.E., Bracket, R.A., Saatchi, S.S., Osburn, G.R. andDohrenwend, J. 1996. Erosional and depositional patterns associated with the 1993 Missouri River loods inferred from SIR-C and TOPSAR radar data. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 23 149-23 167.
44. Jacobberger, P.A. 1988. Mapping abandoned river channels in Mali through directional iltering of thematic mapper data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 26: 161-170.
45. Kaufman, Y.J. 1989. The atmospheric effect on remote sensing andits correction. In: Asrar, G., ed., Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, London: John Wiley andSons, pp. 189-211 (349 p.).
46. Kennedy, G. 1998. Channel migration and loodplain patch dynamics of a montane stream, Orgeon, USA, Unpub-lishedB.Sc. Thesis, University of Stirling.
47. Lane, S.N. 2000. The measurement of river channel morphology using digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 16(96): 937-957.
48. Lane, S.N., Richards, K.S. and Chandler, J.H. 1993. Developments in photogrammetry; the geomorphological potential. Progress in Physical Geography 17: 306-328.
49. Lane, S.N., Chandler, J.H. and Richards, K.S. 1994. Developments in monitoring andmodelling small-scale river bed topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 19: 349-368.
50. Lane, S.N., Westaway, R.M., Hicks, D.M. andDuncan, M. J. 2000. High resolution digital photogrammetry and image analysis for the measurement of large gravel-bed rivers. In: Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, University of Leicester, September 2000.
51. Lapointe, M.F. andCarson, M.A. 1986. Migration patterns of an asymmetric meandering river: the Rouge River, Quebec. Water Resources Research 22: 731-743.
52. Lathrop, R.G. andLillesand, T.M. 1986. Use of thematic mapper data to assess water quality in Green Bay and Central Lake Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52: 349-354.
53. Lewin J. andManton, M.M. 1975. Welsh floodplain studies: the nature of floodplain geometry. Journal of Hydrology 25: 37-50.
54. Lillesand, T.M., Johnson, W.L., Devell, R.L., Lindstrom, O.M. and Mesisner, D.E. 1983. Use of Landsat data to predict the trophic status ofMinnesota lakes. Photogram-metric Engineering and Remote Sensing 49: 219-229.
55. Liu, W.-Y. andKlemes, V. 1988. Quantitative analysis of distributions of suspended sediment in the Yellow River estuary from MSS data. Geocarto International 1: 51-62.
56. Lyzenga, D.R. 1981a. Remote Sensing of bottom reflectance andwater attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft and Landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2: 71-82.
57. Lyzenga, D.R. 1981b. Remote sensing of bottom reflectance andwater attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft andLANDSAT data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2: 71-82.
58. Malthus, T.J., Place, C.J., Bennet, S., North, S. 1995. An evaluation of the airborne thematic mapper sensor for monitoring inlandwaters. In: Proceedings of the Remote Sensing Society Meeting, Southampton, 1995.
59. Marks, K. andBates, P. 2000. Integration ofhigh-resolution topographic data with loodplain low models. Hydro-logical Processes 14(11/12): 2109-2122.
60. Mertes, L.A.K., Smith, M.O. andAdams, J.B. 1993. Estimating suspended sediment concentrations in surface waters of the Amazon River wetlands from Landsat images. Remote Sensing of the Environment 43: 281-301.
61. Milne, J.A. andSear, D.A. 1997. Modelling river channel topography using GIS. International Journal of GIS 11: 99-519.
62. Milton, E.J., Gilvear, D.J., Hooper, I.D. 1995. Investigating river channel changes using remotely senseddata. In: Gurnell, A., Petts, G.E., eds., Changing River Channels, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 277-301 (398 p.).
63. Miranda, F.P., Fonseca, L.E.N. and Carr, J.R. 1998. Semi-variogram textual classification of JERS-1 SAR data obtainedover a flooded area of the Amazon rainforest. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 549-556.
64. Muller, E. 1992. Evaluation de la bande TM5 pour la cartographie morpho-hydrogeologique de la moyenne vallee de la Garonne, Project SPOT4/MIR. CNES, Paris.
65. Muller, E., Decamps, H., Dobson, M.K. 1993. Contribution of space remote sensing to river studies. Freshwater Biology 29: 301-312.
66. Novo, E.M.M., Hansom, J.D. andCurran, P.J. 1989a. The effect of sediment type on the relationship between reflectance and suspended sediment concentration. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1283-1289.
67. Novo, E.M.M., Hansom, J. andCurran, P.J. 1989b. The effect viewing geometry andwavelength on the relationship between relectance and suspended sediment concentration. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1357-1372.
68. Nykanen, D.K., Foufoula-Georgiou, E. andSapozhnikov, V.B. 1998. Study of spatial scaling in braided river patterns using synthetic aperture radar imagery. Water Resources Research 34: 1795-1807.
69. Ormsby, J.P., Blanchard, B.J., et al. 1985. Detection oflow-land flooding using active micro-wave systems. Photo-grammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 51: 317-328.
70. Perez, J. and Muller, E. 1990. Suivi de devolution de la vegetation riveraine du Rio Guanare (Venezuela) a l'aide de donees SPOT XS, LANDSAT MSS et de photos aeriennes. In: Troisiemes Jounrnees Scientifiques du reseau de Teledetectionion de l'UREF, Novembre 13-16, 1990, Toulouse.
71. Phillip, G., Gupta, R.P., Bhattacharya, A. 1989. Channel migration studies in the middle Ganga Basin, India, using remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1141-1149.
72. Plummer, S.E., Danson, F.M. andWilson, A.K. 1995. Advances in remote sensing technology. In: Danson, F.M. andPlummer, S.E., eds., Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing, London: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1-8.
73. Ramasamy, S.M., Bakliwal, P.C., Verma, R.P. 1991. Remote sensing andriver migration in Western India. International Journal of Remote Sensing 12: 2597-2609.
74. Rainey, M.P. 1999. Airborne remote sensing of estuarine intertidal radionuclide concentrations, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling.
75. Rainey, M.P., Tyler, A.N., Bryant, R.G., Gilvear, D.J. and McDonald, P. 2000. The inluence of surface andintersti-tial moisture on the spectral characteristics of inter-tidal sediments; implications for airborne image acquisition and processing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 3025-3038.
76. Ritchie, J.D. 1996. Airborne laser altimeters, remote sensing applications to hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal 41: 625-636.
77. Rudant, J.P. 1994. French Guinana through the clouds: first complete satellite coverage. Earth Observation Quarterly 44: 1-6.
78. Sabins, F.F. 1996. Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation, Sydney: Freeman, 298 p.
79. Salo, J., Kalliola, R., Hakkinen, I., Makinen, Y., Niemala, P., Puhakka, M., Coley, P.D. 1986. River Dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forest. Nature 322: 254-258.
80. Salomonson, V.V., Jackson, T.J., et al. 1983. Water resources assessment. In: Manual of Remote Sensing, Falls Church, Virginia: American Society of Photogrammetry, pp. 1497-1570.
81. Schumann, R.R. 1989. Morphology of RedCreek, Wyoming, an arid-region anastomosing channel system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 14: 277-288.
82. Sippel, S.J., Hamilton, S.K., Melack, J.M. andChoudhury, B.J. 1994. Determination of inundation area in the Amazon River floodplain using the SMMR 37 GHz polarization difference. Remote Sensing of the Environment 48: 70-76.
83. Sippel, S.J., Hamilton, S.K., Melacks, J.M. andNovo, E.M.M. 1998. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 1143-1161.
84. Smith, L.C. 1997. Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage, anddischarge: a review. Hydrological Processes 11(10): 1427-1439.
85. Smith, L.C. and Alsdorf, D.E. 1998. A control on sediment andorganic carbon delivery to the Arctic Ocean revealed with satellite SAR: Ob River, Siberia. Geology 26: 395-398.
86. Sun, K. and Anderson, J.M. 1994. An easily deployable miniature, airborne imaging spectrometer. In: Proceedings of the First International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, Strasbourg, France, Ann Arbor: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan (ERIM), pp. 178-189.
87. Thorne, C.R., Russell, A.P.G. andAlam, M.K. 1993. Planform pattern andchannel evolution of the Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh. In: Best, J.L. and Bristow, C.S., eds., Braided Rivers, The Geological Society Special Publication No. 75, London: Geological Society, pp. 257-277 (417 p.).
88. Townsend, P.A. and Walsh, S.J. 1998. Modelling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 21: 295-312.
89. Townshend, J.R.G. and Justice, C.O. 1988. Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors requiredfor global monitoring of landtransformations. International Journal of Remote Sensing 9: 187-236.
90. Verstraete, M.M. andPinte, B. 1992. Extracting surface properties from satellite data in the visible and near-infraredwavelengths. In: Mather, P.M., ed., Terra-1 Understanding the Terrestrial Environment, London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 203-209.
91. VinodKumar, K., Palit, A. andBhan, S.K. 1997. Bathymet-ric mapping in Rupnarayan-Hooghly conluence using Indian remote sensing satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 2269-2270.
92. Wagner, M.J. 1994. ERS-1 images of the Christmas flood over Europe. Earth Observation Quarterly 43: 12-13.
93. Warburton, J., Davies, T.R.H. andMandl, M.G. 1993. A meso-scale ieldinvestigation of channel change and loodplain characteristics in an upland braided gravel bedriver, New Zealand. In: Best, J.L. andBristow, C.S., eds., Braided Rivers, The Geological Society Special Publication No. 75, London: Geological Society, pp. 241-257 (417 p.).
94. Westaway, R.M., Lane, S.N. andHicks, D.M. 2000. The development of an automated correction procedure for digital photogrammetry for the study of wide, shallow, gravel bedrivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 209-226.
95. Wilson, A.K. 1995. An integrateddata system for airborne remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 1889-1901.
96. Williams, D.R., Romeril, P.M. andMitchell, R.J. 1979. Riverbank erosion andrecession in the Ottawa area. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 16: 641-650.
97. Winterbottom, S. 1995. An analysis of channel change on the rivers Tay andTummel Scotland, using GIS andremote sensing techniques, UnpublishedPh.D. Thesis, University of Stirling.
98. Winterbottom, S.J. 2000. Medium and short-term channel planform changes on the Rivers Tay andTummel, Scotland. Geomorphology 34: 195-208.
99. Winterbottom, S.J. andGilvear, D.J. 1997. Quantification of channel bedmorphology in gravel-bedrivers using airborne multispectral imagery andaerial photography. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 489-499.
100. Wright, A., Marcus, W.M. andAspinall, R. 2000. Evaluation of multi-spectral imagery as a tool for mapping stream morphology. Geomorphology 33: 107-120.
101. Xia, L. 1993. A unitedmodel for quantitative remote sensing of suspended sediment Concentration. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14: 2665-2676.