Designing an environmental peformance system to assess urban transit corridors;Diseño de un sistema de evaluación del rendimiento ambiental en corredores de movilidad urbana

Architecture, City and Environment

Volumn , Issue 25, 2014, Pages 43-68

  Soria Lara, Julio Alberto ^a   Valenzuela Montes, Luis Miguel ^b  

^a AISSR (Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research)   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Assessment; Corridor; Environmental; Mobility; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903391644     PISSN: 18877052     EISSN: 18864805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5821/ace.9.25.3621     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ARCE, R.M. et al. Los sistemas de información geográfica aplicados a la evaluación ambiental de la planificación. En: Ciudad y Territorio: Estudios Territoriales, (165-166): 514-528, 2010.
2. ADAMS, J. Transport Planning: Vision and practice. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981. 272 p.
3. BANISTER, D. Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. Londres, Routledge. 2005. 292 p.
4. BANISTER, D. y BUTTON, K. Transport, the environment and sustainable development. Londres, E & F N Spon, 1992. 275 p.
5. BARRERO, J. y MARTINEZ-VILANOVA, J. Transporte urbano y consume energético. En: Revista Ciudad y Territorio, (2): 73-82, 1980.
6. BERTOLINI, L. et al. Urban planning in transition. En: Transport policy, (2): 69-72, 2008.
7. BREHENY, M. y ROOKWOOD, R. Planning the sustainable city region en Blowers (Ed) Planning for a sustainable environment (Report) Londres, Earthscan, 1993, pp: 150-189.
8. BRONS, M. et al. Efficiency of urban public transit: A meta-analysis. En: Journal of Transportation, (32): 1-2, 2005.
9. BUCHANAN, C. Traffic in towns. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1963. 259 p.
10. BURNETT, K.P. y HANSON, S. An Analysis of Travel as an example of Complex Human Behavior in Spatially Constrained Situations. En: Transportation Research, (16A), 1982.
11. CEC. Commission of the European Communities. Sustainable mobility: Green paper on the impact of transport on the environment [COM 92 (46)] Brussels, CEC, 1992.
12. CRESPO, M. Dificultades mutuas del planeamiento urbanístico y sectorial. En: Revista Ciudad y Territorio, (91-92): 11-19, 1992.
13. DE BORGER, B. et al. Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? En: Journal of Transport Reviews, 22 (1): 1-38, 2002.
14. DIANA, M. y DARAIO, C. Performance indicators for urban public transport systems with a focus on transport policy effectiveness issues. En: World Conference on Transport Research, (WCTR, Lisboa 2010). Paper. Lisboa, World Conference on Transport Research, 2010, pp: 258.
15. DIX, M.C. y GOODWIN, P.S. Petrol prices and car use: a synthesis of conflicting evidence. En: Transport Policy Decision Making, (2): 179-195, 1982.
16. DOBRANSKYTE, A. et al. Indicators to Assess Sustainability of Transport Activities. Review of the Existing Transport Sustainability Indicators Initiatives and Development of an Indicator Set to Assess Transport Sustainability Performance. JRC Scientific and technological research, 2007.
17. EC. European Commission. Mainstreaming sustainable development into EU policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development [en línea] Fecha de consulta: 25 de abril de 2010. Disponible en: . 2009.
18. EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. EEA. Transport at a crossroads. TERM 2008: indicators tracking transport and environment in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (EEA report, no. 3/2009). 2009
19. EUROSTAT. Sustainable development in the European Union: 2009 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy [en línea] 25 de abril de 2010. Disponible en: . 2009.
20. GERIKE, R. et al. Development of an environmental performance index for the German Transport System. En: World Conference on Transport Research, (WCTR, Lisboa 2010). Paper. Lisboa, World Conference on Transport Research, 2010, pp: 452.
21. GÓMEZ, M. y BARREDO J.I. Sistemas de información geográfica y evaluación multicriterio en la ordenación del territorio. Madrid, Ra-Ma, 2005. 279 p.
22. GOODWIN, P et al. Transport: The new Realism. Report to the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund. Oxford, University of Oxford Transport Studies Unit, 1991. 166 p.
23. GUDMUNDSSON, H. Indicators and performance measures for Transportation, Environment and Sustainability in North America. Copenhagen, Ministry of Environment and Energy National Environmental Research Institute. 2001. 153 p.
24. FARRELL, M. The measurement of productive efficiency. En: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (120): 253-281, 1957.
25. HERCE, M. Sobre la movilidad en la ciudad: propuestas para recuperar un derecho ciudadano (Vol. 18) Barcelona, Reverté, 2009. 328 p.
26. HERCE, M.; MAGRINYÀ, F. y MIRÓ, J. L'espai urbà de la mobilitat., Ediciones UPC de la Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya. 2007. 221 p.
27. HERRERO, A.; MENÉNDEZ, F.; MOLINO, E.; PUIG-PEY, P. y RUBIO, J. Consideraciones generales en torno a la política del transporte urbano. En: Ciudad y territorio: Revista de ciencia urbana, (2): 7-19, 1980. ISSN: 0210-0487.
28. LANDETA, J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. En: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (73): 467-482, 2006.
29. LITMAN, T. Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Victoria (Canadá), Victoria Transport Policy Institue, 2009. 14 p.
30. LÓPEZ, E. Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans. An strategic approach integrating efficiency, cohesion and environmental aspects (Tesis Doctoral) Madrid, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. 2007. 204 p.
31. LÓPEZ, R.; CATALÀ, R.; ESQUIUS, A. SIMCAT: Sistema de Modelización de movilidad y tráfico en Catalunya: integración al modelo EVALÚAMET. En: ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 7 (19): 187-216, 2012.
32. MALCZEWSKI, J. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1999. 392 p.
33. METCALF, A.E. The perception of car running costs. Bruselas, Commision of the European Communities, 1978.
34. MILLER, C. Sustainable transportation performance indicators (STPI) project. New York, Centre for Sustainable Transportation in cooperation with IBI Group and Metropole Consultants, 2002. 374 p.
35. NESS, B. et al. Categorizing tools for sustainability assessment. En: Ecological Economics, (60): 498-508, 2007.
36. ODOT. 46 Annual Performance Progress Report-Fiscal Year 2006-07. Oregon, Oregon Department of Transportation, 2007. 85 p.
37. OECD. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Environmental indicators. Paris, OECD, 1991. 223 p.
38. OWENS, S. Strategic planning and energy conservation. En: Town Planning Review, 57 (1): 69-68, 1986.
39. PEYREBRUNE, H.L. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations: Report of a Conference. En: Conference on Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations, (Irvine, California, 2000). Paper. San Francisco, 2000, pp: 120-121.
40. POZUETA, J. Transporte y planificación urbanística. Métodos de gestión de la demanda. En: Revista Ciudad y Territorio, (91-92): 119-136, 1992.
41. RICCI, A. et al. Assessing the performance of ITS in major cities. En: World Conference on Transport Research, (WCTR, Lisboa 2010). Paper. Lisboa, World Conference on Transport Research, 2010.
42. SHIFTAN, Y. et al. Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transport system. En: Transportation Research Part D, (8): 323-342, 2003.
43. SORIA-LARA, J.A. Modelo de umbrales para la evaluación ambiental de la movilidad urbana (Tesis Doctoral). Doctorado en Urbanismo, Ordenación del Territorio y Medio Ambiente. Granada (España), Universidad de Granada, 2011. 471 p.
44. VALENZUELA, L. M et al. Hacia la integración de los planes y proyectos andaluces de movilidad metropolitana [en línea] Fecha de consulta: 12 de febrero de 2013. En: Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, (XV). Disponible en: . 2011.
45. WCED. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. United Nations (UN), 1987. 416 p.