Correction: Crisis of Japanese vascular flora shown by quantifying extinction risks for 1618 taxa(PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 6 (e98954) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0098954);Crisis of Japanese vascular flora shown by quantifying extinction risks for 1618 taxa

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Kadoya, Taku ^a   Takenaka, Akio ^a   Ishihama, Fumiko ^a   Fujita, Taku ^b   Ogawa, Makoto ^c   Katsuyama, Teruo ^d   Kadono, Yasuro ^e   Kawakubo, Nobumitsu ^f   Serizawa, Shunsuke ^g   Takahashi, Hideki ^h   Takamiya, Masayuki ⁱ   Fujii, Shinji ^j   Matsuda, Hiroyuki ^k   Muneda, Kazuo ^k   Yokota, Masatsugu ^l   Yonekura, Koji ^m   Yahara, Tetsukazu ⁿ  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b The Catalysis Society of Japan   (Japan)

^c Hachiman chô   (Japan)

^d KANAGAWA PREFECTURAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Japan)

^e KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g Aichi Kyoiku University   (Japan)

^h HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁱ KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^j UNIVERSITY OF HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS   (Japan)

^k YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^l UNIVERSITY OF THE RYUKYUS   (Japan)

^m TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁿ KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CRISIS THEORY; FLORA; MASS EXTINCTION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; RATING SCALE; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TAXONOMY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VASCULAR PLANT; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; JAPAN; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PLANT;

EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; JAPAN; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PLANTS;

EID: 84903385000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102384     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 71-76. (Pubitemid 43144380)
2. Mace GM, Lande R (1991) Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv Biol 5: 148-157.
3. Possingham HP, Wilson KA (2005) Biodiversity: Turning up the heat on hotspots. Nature 436: 919-920. (Pubitemid 41191658)
4. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, et al. (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 503-507.
5. IUCN (2012) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2
6. Laurance WF, Useche DC, Rendeiro J, Kalka M, Bradshaw CJA, et al. (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489: 290-294.
7. IUCN, UNEP-WCMC (2012) The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA): February 2012. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC.
8. CBD (2010) COP Decision X/2. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020.
9. Moore JL, Folkmann M, Balmford A, Brooks T, Burgess N, et al. (2003) Heuristic and optimal solutions for set-covering problems in conservation biology. Ecography 26: 595-601. (Pubitemid 37446856)
10. Yahara T, Kato T, Inoue K, Yokota M, Kadono Y, et al. (1998) Red list of Japanese vascular plants: summary of methods and results. Proceedings of Japanese Society for Plant Systematics 13: 89-96.
11. Moilanen A, Wilson LA, Possingham HP, editors (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitaive methods & computational tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Smith FDM, May RM, Pellew R, Johnson TH, Walter KS (1993) Estimating extinction rates. Nature 364: 494-496.
13. Butchart SHM, Scharlemann JPW, Evans MI, Quader S, Arico S, et al. (2012) Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLOS ONE 7, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032529
14. Kadoya T, Ishii HS, Kikuchi R, Suda S, Washitani I (2009) Using monitoring data gathered by volunteers to predict the potential distribution of the invasive alien bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Biol Conserv 142: 1011-1017.
15. Kadoya T, Suda S, Washitani I (2009) Dragonfly crisis in Japan: A likely consequence of recent agricultural habitat degradation. Biol Conserv 142: 1899-1905.