Removal of As(V) from simulated groundwater using forward osmosis: Effect of competing and coexisting solutes

Desalination

Volumn 348, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-38

  Mondal, Priyanka ^a   Tran, Anh Thi Kim ^a,b   Van der Bruggen, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b HCM University of Technical Education   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Arsenic; Forward osmosis; Synthetic groundwater

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC; FLUORINE COMPOUNDS; GROUNDWATER; NITRATES; ORGANIC ACIDS; OSMOSIS; SILICATES; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DONNAN EXCLUSION; FORWARD OSMOSIS; FOULING LAYERS; ORGANIC CONTAMINANT; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SIMULATED GROUND WATER; SYNTHETIC GROUNDWATER;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GROUNDWATER; HUMIC ACID; OSMOSIS; PH; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84903382585     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Smedley P., Kinniburgh D. A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17:517-568.
2. Mandal B.K., Suzuki K.T. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 2002, 58:201-235.
3. Kapaj S., Peterson H., Liber K., Bhattacharya P. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning arsenic poisoning-a review. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2006, 41:2399-2428.
4. Jin X., She Q., Ang X., Tang C.Y. Removal of boron and arsenic by forward osmosis membrane: influence of membrane orientation and organic fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:182-187.
5. Butler E., Silva A., Horton K., Rom Z., Chwatko M. Point of use water treatment with forward osmosis for emergency relief. Desalination 2013, 312:23-30.
6. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
7. Mondal P., Bhowmick S., Chatterjee D., Figoli A., Van der Bruggen B. Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: a critical assessment of technological solutions. Chemosphere 2013, 92:157-170.
8. Mondal P., Hermans N., Tran A.T.K., Zhang Y., Fang Y., Wang X., Van der Bruggen B. Effect of Physico-chemical Parameters on Inorganic Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solution Using a Forward Osmosis Membrane 2014, 10.1016/j.jece.2014.04.015.
9. Cath T.Y., Hancock N.T., Lundin C.D., Hoppe-Jones C., Drewes J.E. A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362:417-426.
10. Yangali-Quintanilla V., Li Z., Valladares R., Li Q., Amy G. Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 2011, 280:160-166.
11. Zhao S., Zou L., Mulcahy D. Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis-nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute. Desalination 2012, 284:175-181.
12. Seidel A., Waypa J.J., Elimelech M. Role of charge (Donnan) exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2001, 18:105-113.
13. Xia S., Dong B., Zhang Q., Xu B., Gao N., Causseranda C. Study of arsenic removal by nanofiltration and its application in China. Desalination 2007, 204:374-379.
14. Farooqi A., Masuda H., Firdous N. Toxic fluoride and arsenic contaminated groundwater in the Lahore and Kasur districts, Punjab, Pakistan and possible contaminant sources. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 45:839-849.
15. Zhao B., Zhao H., Ni J. Arsenic removal by Donnan dialysis: effect of the accompanying components. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 72:250-255.
16. Wilkie J.A., Hering J.G. Adsorption of arsenic onto hydrous ferric oxide: effects of adsorbate/adsorbent ratios and co-occurring solutes. Colloids Surf. A 1996, 107:97-110.
17. 3- on arsenic adsorption to HFO. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2002, 94:174-181.
18. Lee B.W., De Haan M., Reddy S., Martindale A. Evaluation of EBCT on arsenic adsorption performance and competitive preloading. Proceedings, AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference and Exhibition 2004.
19. Ning R.Y. Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 2002, 143:237-241.
20. Brookins D.G. Eh-pH Diagrams for Geochemistry 1988, 28-29. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
21. Ergican E., Gecol H., Fuchs A. The effect of co-occurring inorganic solutes on the removal of arsenic(V) from water using cationic surfactant micelles and an ultrafiltration membrane. Desalination 2005, 181:9-26.
22. APHA, AWWA, WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, APHA, Washington DC, USA. 20th ed.
23. Jeong Y., Maohong F., Van Leeuwen J., Belczyk J.F. Effect of competing solutes on arsenic(V) adsorption using iron and aluminum oxides. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19:910-919.
24. Choi S., Yun Z., Hong S., Ahn K. The effect of co-existing ions and surface characteristics of nanomembranes on the removal of nitrate and fluoride. Desalination 2001, 133:53-64.
25. Saitua H., Gil R., Perez Padilla A. Experimental investigation on arsenic removal with a nanofiltration pilot plant from naturally contaminated groundwater. Desalination 2011, 274:1-6.
26. Giasuddin A.B.M., Kanel S.R., Choi H. Adsorption of humic acid onto nanoscale zerovalent iron and its effect on arsenic removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2022-2027.
27. Tipping E. Cation Binding by Humic Substances 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Liu T., Tsang D.C.W., Lo I.M.C. Chromium(VI) reduction kinetics by zero-valent iron in moderately hard water with humic acid: iron dissolution and humic acid adsorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:2092-2098.
29. Kim C., Lee S., Shon H.K., Elimelech M., Hong S. Boron transport in forward osmosis: measurements, mechanisms, and comparison with reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 419-420:42-48.
30. Ng H.Y., Tang W., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2408-2413.
31. Mccutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane precesses. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:458-466.
32. Jin X., Tang C.Y., Gu Y.S., She Q.H., Qi S.R. Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane process: modeling experiments, and implication. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:2323-2330.
33. Singh A.K., Bhagowati S., Das T.K., Yubbe D., Rahman B., Nath M., Obing P., Singh W.S.K., Renthlei C.Z., Pachuau L., Thakur R. Assessment of arsenic, fluoride, iron, nitrate and heavy metals in drinking water of northeastern India. ENVIS Bull. Himal. Ecol. 2008, 16:1-7.
34. Emmett Holt L., La Mer V.K., Bruce Chown H. Studies in calcification I. The solubility product of secondary and tertiary calcium phosphate under various conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 1925, 64:509-565.
35. Pismenskaya N., Laktionov E., Nikonenko V., El Attar A., Auclair B., Pourcelly G. Dependence of composition of anion-exchange membranes and their electrical conductivity on concentration of sodium salts of carbonic and phosphoric acids. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 181:185-197.
36. Meng X.G., Bang S.B., Korfiatis G.P. Effect of silicate, sulfate, and carbonate on arsenic removal by ferric chloride. Water Res. 2000, 34:1255-1261.
37. Nghiem L.D., Schafer A.I., Elimelech M. Role of electrostatic interactions in the retention of pharmaceutically active contaminants by a loose nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:52-59.
38. Jr E.R. Nightingale, phenomenological theory of ion solvation effective radii of hydrated ions. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63:1381-1387.
39. Paugam L., Diawara C.K., Schlumpf J.P., Jaouen P., Quéméneur F. Transfer of monovalent anions and nitrates especially through nanofiltration membranes in brackish water conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40:237-242.
40. Wasay S.A., Tokunaga S., Park S.W. Removal of hazardous anions from aqueous solutions by La(III)- and Y(III)-impregnated alumina. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1996, 31:1501-1514.
41. El Khatib E.A., Balba A.M. Arsenate chemistry in soils of arid ecosystems. Alex. Sci. Exch. 2004, 25:229-261.
42. Parida V., Ng H.Y. Forward osmosis organic fouling: effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation. Desalination 2013, 312:88-98.
43. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. Impact of humic acid fouling on membrane performance and transport of pharmaceutically active compounds in forward osmosis. Water Res. 2013, 47:4567-4575.
44. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. Impact of organic and colloidal fouling on trace organic contaminant rejection by forward osmosis: role of initial permeate flux. Desalination 2014, 336:146-152.
45. Wang Y., Combe C., Clark M.M. The effects of pH and calcium on the diffusion coefficient of humic acid. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 183:49-60.
46. Wang D.-X., Su M., Yu Z.-Y., Wang X.-L., Ando M., Shintani T. Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions. Desalination 2005, 175:219-225.
47. Vrijenhoek E.M., Waypa J.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a "loose" nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2000, 130:265-277.
48. Linde K., Jönson A.S. Nanofiltration of salt solutions and landfill leachate. Desalination 1995, 103:223-232.