Science, stories and the anti-vaccination movement

Human Affairs

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 287-298

  Veselková, Marcela ^a  

^a Faculty of Natural Sciences   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

mandatory vaccination; narrative policy framework; wicked problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903374709     PISSN: 12103055     EISSN: 1337401X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s13374-014-0227-8     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andre, F. E., Booy, R., Bock, H. L., Clemens, J., Datta, S. K., John, T. J., Lee, B. W., Lolekha, S., Peltola, H., Ruff T. A., Santosham, M., & Schmitt, H. J. (2008). Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(2), 81-160.
2. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bennett, C., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275-94.
4. Betsch, C., Brewer, N. T., Brocard, P., Davies, P., Gaissmaier, W., Haase, N., Leask, J., Renkewitz, F., Renner, B., Reyna, V. F., Rossmann, C., Sachse, K., Schachinger, A., Siegrist, M., & Stryk, M. (2012). Opportunities and challenges of Web 2. 0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine, 30, 3727-3733.
5. Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459-470.
6. Caplan, N. S., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R. (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
7. Chermack, T. J. (2004). Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures, 36, 295-309.
8. Dunn, W. N. (1980). The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: an explanatory case study. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 515-536.
9. Freed, G. L., Clark, S. J., Butchart, A. T., Singer, D. C., & Davis, M. M. (2011). Sources and perceived credibility of vaccine-safety information for parents. Pediatrics, 127(Supplement), S107-S112.
10. Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W. & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 13-24.
11. Hobson-West, P. (2007). Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all: Organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 198-215.
12. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
13. Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & deLeon, P. (2007). Social construction and policy design. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 93-128). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14. Innvaer, S., Vist, G., Trommald, M., & Oxman, A. (2002). Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(4), 239-244.
15. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Introduction. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? The Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353.
17. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston/Toronto: Little Brown & Company.
18. Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
19. May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331-354.
20. McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 413-429.
21. McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Hathaway, P. L., Tigert, L. E., & Sampson, L. J. (2010). Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater Yellowstone. Policy Sciences, 43, 391-409.
22. McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Arnell, R. J., & Hathaway, P. L. (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. The Policy Studies Journal, 35(1), 87-108.
23. Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Perry, B. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729-768.
24. Mosteller, F. (2006). Innovation and evaluation. In S. E. Fienberg & D. C. Hoaglin (Eds.), Selected Papers of Frederick Mosteller (pp. 515-529). Springer Science + Business Media.
25. Neilson, S. (2001). Knowledge utilization and public policy processes: A literature review. Ottawa: Evaluation Unit, IDRC December.
26. Nowlin, M. C. (2011). Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(S1), 41-60.
27. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835-e842.
28. Pralle, S, B. (2006). Branching out digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29. Quattrone, G., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82, 719-36.
30. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
31. Roe, E. (1991). Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development. World Development, 19(4), 287-300.
32. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33. Sabatier, P. (1978). The acquisition and utilization of technical information by administrative agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(September), 386-411.
34. Sabatier, P. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. Knowledge, 8(June), 649-92.
35. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition gramework of policy change and the role of policyoriented learning therein. Policy Science, 21(2/3), 129-168.
36. Sabatier, P. A. (2000). Clear enough to be wrong. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 135-40.
37. Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., Tigert, L. E., & Hathaway, P. L. (2010). From protests to litigation to YouTube: A longitudinal case study of strategic lobby tactic choice for the Buffalo Field Campaign. Social Science Journal, 47(1), 137-150.
38. Shanahan, E., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453-483.
39. Simon, H. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79(June), 293-304.
40. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas Press.
41. Scholz, J., & Pinney, N. (1995). Duty, fear, and tax compliance: The heuristic basis of citizenships behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 39(May), 490-512.
42. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. (Revised ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
43. Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
44. Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95-114.
45. Weber, E. P., Memon, A., & Painter, B. (2011). Science, society, and water resources in New Zealand: Recognizing and overcoming a societal impasse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 49-69.
46. Weible, C. M. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95-117.
47. Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.
48. Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2007). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In. F Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 123-136). Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
49. Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social science research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531-545.
50. Weiss, C. (1999). The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation, 5(1), 468-86.
51. Wildavsky, A., & Tenenbaum, E. (1981). The politics of mistrust. Beverly Hills: Sage.