Satisfaction with information provision is associated with baseline but not with follow-up quality of life among lymphoma patients: Results from the PROFILES registry

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 917-926

  Husson, O ^a,b   Oerlemans, S ^a,b   Mols, F ^a,b   Smeets, R E H ^c   Poortmans, P M ^d   Van De Poll Franse, L V ^a,b  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Eindhoven Cancer Registry   (Netherlands)

^c ST ANNA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d Institute Verbeeten   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DEPRESSION; EMOTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REGISTRY; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF CANCER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE C30; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF CANCER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE INFORMATION; HODGKIN DISEASE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NETHERLANDS; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; REGISTER; SATISFACTION;

ANXIETY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; LYMPHOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84903303734     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.879201     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. van der Meulen N, Jansen J, van Dulmen S, Bensing J, van Weert J . Interventions to improve recall of medical information in cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature . Psychooncology 2008; 17: 857-68.
2. Mulcare H, Schofield P, Kashima Y, Milgrom J, Wirth A, Bishop M, et al. Adjustment to cancer and the information needs of people with lung cancer . Psychooncology 2011; 20: 488-96.
3. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J . I nformation needs of patients with cancer: Results from a large study in UK cancer centres . Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 48-51.
4. Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ . What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 1117-28.
5. Mesters I, van den Borne B, De Boer M, Pruyn J . M easuring information needs among cancer patients . Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 253-62.
6. Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV . The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: A systematic review . Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 761-72.
7. Oerlemans S, Husson O, Mols F, Poortmans P, R oerdink H, Daniel LA, et al. Substantial variation in information provision and satisfaction among lymphoma and multiple myeloma survivors implies room for improvement in cancer survivorship care: Results from a large population-based PROFILES study . Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 1587-97.
8. Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos A D, Aziz N, Rowland J . Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: A systematic review of research (1980-2003) . Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 250-61.
9. van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, Eenbergen MV, Denollet J, Roukema JA, Aaronson NK, et al. The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts . Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 2188-94.
10. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN . The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research . Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 156-63.
11. Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, Chie WC, B ergenmar M, Constantini A, et al. An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: An instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients . Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2726-38.
12. Singer S, Engelberg P M, WeiSsflog G, K uhnt S, E rnst J . Construct validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire information module . Qual Life Res 2013; 22: 123-9.
13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, B ullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A qualityof- life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology . J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365-76.
14. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP . The hospital anxiety and depression scale . Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-70.
15. Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, M artyn St-James M, Fayers PM, Brown JM . Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 . J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 89-96.
16. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW . I nterpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation . Med Care 2003; 41: 582-92.
17. Babyak M A . What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models . Psychosom Med 2004; 66: 411-21.
18. Scharloo M, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Langeveld TP, van Velzen-Verkaik E, Doorn-op den Akker MM, Kaptein AA . Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer . Head Neck 2005; 27: 857-63.
19. Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe CP, Hamilton AS, et al. Health information needs and healthrelated quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors . Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89: 345-52.
20. Hack T F, Degner L F, Parker P A . The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: A review . Psychooncology 2005; 14: 831-45; discussion 46-7.
21. Street R L, Jr., Makoul G, Arora N K, Epstein R M . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 295-301.
22. National Cancer Policy Board. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition . Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
23. Miller SM . Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease . Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer 1995; 76: 167-77.
24. van de Poll-Franse LV, Nicolaije KA, Vos MC, P ijnenborg JM, Boll D, Husson O, et al. The impact of a cancer Survivorship Care Plan on gynecological cancer patient and health care provider reported outcomes (ROGY Care): Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial . Trials 2011; 12: 256.
25. Takeuchi EE, Keding A, Awad N, Hofmann U, Campbell LJ, Selby PJ, et al. Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication . J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2910-7.