A data standard for sourcing fit-for-purpose biological samples in an integrated virtual network of biobanks

Biopreservation and Biobanking

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 184-191

  Quinlan, Philip R ^a   Mistry, Gita ^b   Bullbeck, Helen ^c   Carter, Anne ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Brainstrust   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; BREAST CANCER CAMPAIGN TISSUE BANK; CONFEDERATION OF CANCER BIOBANK; DATA BASE; DISEASE REGISTRY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; NATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; TISSUE PRESERVATION; COOPERATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOLOGY; REGISTER; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84903301755     PISSN: 19475535     EISSN: 19475543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2013.0089     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Norlin L, Eriksson M, Merino-Martinez R, Anderberg M, Kurtovic S, and Litton J-E. Biopreservation and biobanking, A minimum data set for sharing biobank samples, information, and data: MIABIS. Biopreserv Biobanking 2012; 10:343-348.
2. Thompson A, Brennan K, Cox A, et al. Evaluation of the current knowledge limitations in breast cancer research: A gap analysis. Breast Cancer Res 2008;0:R26.
3. Mabile L, Dalgleish R, Thorisson GA, et al. Quantifying the use of bioresources for promoting their sharing in scientific research. GigaScience 2013;2:7.
4. Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, et al., Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2013'15:R92.
5. Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 2012;486:346-352.
6. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories, Repositories, I.S.f.B.a.E., 2012 Best Practices for Repositories, Collection, Storage, Retrieval, and Distribution of Biological Materials for Research. Biopreserv Biobanking 2012;10:79-161.
7. Moore HM, Kelly A, McShane LM, Vaught J. Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ). Transfusion 2013;53.
8. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei,W et al., and Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics, REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Cancer 2005;93: 387-391.
9. Lehmann S, Moore H, Ashton G, et al. [International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Working Group on Biospecimen Science], Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: Review and implementation of the sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC). Biopreserv Biobanking 2012:10:366-374.