Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography

Nature Reviews Cardiology

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 390-402

  Maurovich Horvat, Pál ^a   Ferencik, Maros ^b   Voros, Szilard ^c   Merkely, Béla ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^b  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CALCIFICATION; CALCULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; EROSION; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ATTENUATION; REVIEW; RUPTURE; SHEAR STRESS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84903265701     PISSN: 17595002     EISSN: 17595010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.60     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Mathers, C. D. & Loncar, D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 3, e442 (2006).
2. WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [online], http://www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/ (2013).
3. Go, A. S. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129, e28-e292 (2014).
4. Heidenreich, P. A. et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123, 933-944 (2011).
5. Nabel, E. G. & Braunwald, E. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 54-63 (2012).
6. Libby, P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2004-2013 (2013).
7. Narula, J. & Strauss, H. W. The popcorn plaques. Nat. Med. 13, 532-534 (2007).
8. Braunwald, E. Epilogue: what do clinicians expect from imagers? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47 (Suppl.), C101-C103 (2006).
9. Waxman, S., Ishibashi, F. & Muller, J. E. Detection and treatment of vulnerable plaques and vulnerable patients: novel approaches to prevention of coronary events. Circulation 114, 2390-2411 (2006).
10. Burke, A. P. et al. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 1276-1282 (1997).
11. Falk, E., Nakano, M., Bentzon, J. F., Finn, A. V. & Virmani, R. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists' view. Eur. Heart J. 34, 719-728 (2013).
12. Virmani, R., Kolodgie, F. D., Burke, A. P., Farb, A. & Schwartz, S. M. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20, 1262-1275 (2000).
13. Narula, J. et al. Arithmetic of vulnerable plaques for noninvasive imaging. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 5 (Suppl. 2), S2-S10 (2008).
14. Finn, A. V., Nakano, M., Narula, J., Kolodgie, F. D. & Virmani, R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30, 1282-1292 (2010).
15. Narula, J. et al. Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 61, 1041-1051 (2013).
16. Ferencik, M. et al. A computed tomography-based coronary lesion score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain and significant coronary stenosis on coronary computed tomographic angiogram. Am. J. Cardiol. 110, 183-189 (2012).
17. Achenbach, S. et al. CV Imaging: What was new in 2012? JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 6, 714-734 (2013).
18. Achenbach, S. & Raggi, P. Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography. Eur. Heart J. 31, 1442-1448 (2010).
19. Virmani, R., Burke, A. P., Farb, A. & Kolodgie, F. D. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47 (Suppl.), C13-C18 (2006).
20. Achenbach, S. Can CT detect the vulnerable coronary plaque? Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 24, 311-312 (2008).
21. Kolodgie, F. D. et al. The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 16, 285-292 (2001).
22. van der Giessen, A. G. et al. Reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition by computed tomography: an ex vivo comparison to intravascular ultrasound. Invest. Radiol. 45, 693-701 (2010).
23. Hoffmann, U., Ferencik, M., Cury, R. C. & Pena, A. J. Coronary CT angiography. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 797-806 (2006).
24. Stone, G. W. et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 226-235 (2011).
25. Blackmon, K. N. et al. Reproducibility of automated noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden assessment at coronary CT angiography. J. Thorac. Imaging 24, 96-102 (2009).
26. Hoffmann, U. et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47, 1655-1662 (2006).
27. Klass, O. et al. Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 26, 711-720 (2010).
28. Brodoefel, H. et al. Coronary plaque quantification by voxel analysis: dual-source MDCT angiography versus intravascular sonography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 192, W84-W89 (2009).
29. Schepis, T. et al. Quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Heart 96, 610-615 (2010).
30. Boogers, M. J. et al. Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification. Eur. Heart J. 33, 1007-1016 (2012).
31. Voros, S. et al. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 4, 198-208 (2011).
32. Voros, S. et al. Coronary atherosclerosis imaging by coronary CT angiography: current status, correlation with intravascular interrogation and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 537-548 (2011).
33. Oberoi, S. et al. Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 202, W43-W49 (2014).
34. Pflederer, T. et al. Characterization of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes using coronary dual-source CT angiography. Atherosclerosis 211, 437-444 (2010).
35. Madder, R. D., Chinnaiyan, K. M., Marandici, A. M. & Goldstein, J. A. Features of disrupted plaques by coronary computed tomographic angiography: correlates with invasively proven complex lesions. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 105-113 (2011).
36. Motoyama, S. et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54, 49-57 (2009).
37. Versteylen, M. O. et al. Additive value of semiautomated quantification of coronary artery disease using cardiac computed tomographic angiography to predict future acute coronary syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 61, 2296-2305 (2013).
38. Kristensen, T. S. et al. Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58, 502-509 (2011).
39. Papadopoulou, S. L. et al. Natural history of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 5 (Suppl.), S28-S37 (2012).
40. Schlett, C. L. et al. How to assess non-calcified plaque in CT angiography: delineation methods affect diagnostic accuracy of low-attenuation plaque by CT for lipid-core plaque in histology. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 1099-1105 (2013).
41. Becker, C. R., Knez, A., Ohnesorge, B., Schoepf, U. J. & Reiser, M. F. Imaging of noncalcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 423-424 (2000).
42. Achenbach, S. et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109, 14-17 (2004).
43. Pohle, K. et al. Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis 190, 174-180 (2007).
44. Marwan, M. et al. In vivo CT detection of lipid-rich coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques using quantitative histogram analysis: a head to head comparison with IVUS. Atherosclerosis 215, 110-115 (2011).
45. Schlett, C. L. et al. Histogram analysis of lipid-core plaques in coronary computed tomographic angiography: ex vivo validation against histology. Invest. Radiol. 48, 646-653 (2013).
46. Kashiwagi, M. et al. Feasibility of noninvasive assessment of thin-cap fibroatheroma by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2, 1412-1419 (2009).
47. Ito, T. et al. Comparison of in vivo assessment of vulnerable plaque by 64-slice multislice computed tomography versus optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 107, 1270-1277 (2011).
48. Achenbach, S. et al. Influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on the computed tomographic attenuation of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 4, 110-115 (2010).
49. Cademartiri, F. et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur. Radiol. 15, 1426-1431 (2005).
50. Ferencik, M. et al. Arterial wall imaging: evaluation with 16-section multidetector CT in blood vessel phantoms and ex vivo coronary arteries. Radiology 240, 708-716 (2006).
51. Suzuki, S. et al. Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point. Invest. Radiol. 41, 510-515 (2006).
52. Dey, D. et al. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. Radiology 257, 516-522 (2010).
53. Motoyama, S. et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50, 319-326 (2007).
54. Ozaki, Y. et al. Coronary CT angiographic characteristics of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes not related to plaque rupture as defined by optical coherence tomography and angioscopy. Eur. Heart J. 32, 2814-2823 (2011).
55. Kim, S. Y. et al. The culprit lesion score on multi-detector computed tomography can detect vulnerable coronary artery plaque. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 26 (Suppl. 2), 245-252 (2010).
56. Kitagawa, T. et al. Characterization of noncalcified coronary plaques and identification of culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome by 64-slice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2, 153-160 (2009).
57. Nakazawa, G. et al. Efficacy of culprit plaque assessment by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography to predict transient no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. Heart J. 155, 1150-1157 (2008).
58. Kodama, T., Kondo, T., Oida, A., Fujimoto, S. & Narula, J. Computed tomographic angiography-verified plaque characteristics and slow-flow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 5, 636-643 (2012).
59. Tanaka, A. et al. Non-invasive assessment of plaque rupture by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography-comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circ. J. 72, 1276-1281 (2008).
60. Maurovich-Horvat, P. et al. The napkin-ring sign: CT signature of high risk coronary plaques? JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 440-444 (2010).
61. Maurovich-Horvat, P. et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 5, 1243-1252 (2012).
62. Seifarth, H. et al. Histopathological correlates of the napkin-ring sign plaque in coronary CT angiography. Atherosclerosis 224, 90-96 (2012).
63. Yamamoto, H., Kitagawa, T. & Kihara, Y. Dose napkin-ring sign suggest possibility to identify rupture-prone plaque in coronary computed tomography angiography? J. Cardiol. 62, 328-329 (2013).
64. Otsuka, K. et al. Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 6, 448-457 (2013).
65. Glagov, S., Weisenberg, E., Zarins, C. K., Stankunavicius, R. & Kolettis, G. J. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N. Engl. J. Med. 316, 1371-1375 (1987).
66. Varnava, A. M., Mills, P. G. & Davies, M. J. Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 105, 939-943 (2002).
67. Achenbach, S. et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 842-847 (2004).
68. Gauss, S. et al. Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Heart 97, 991-997 (2011).
69. Moselewski, F. et al. Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am. J. Cardiol. 94, 1294-1297 (2004).
70. Mintz, G. S. et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37, 1478-1492 (2001).
71. Kröner, E. S. et al. Positive remodeling on coronary computed tomography as a marker for plaque vulnerability on virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Am. J. Cardiol. 107, 1725-1729 (2011).
72. Otsuka, F., Finn, A. V. & Virmani, R. Do vulnerable and ruptured plaques hide in heavily calcified arteries? Atherosclerosis 229, 34-37 (2013).
73. Greenland, P., LaBree, L., Azen, S. P., Doherty, T. M. & Detrano, R. C. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291, 210-215 (2004).
74. Taylor, A. J. et al. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46, 807-814 (2005).
75. Huang, H. et al. The impact of calcification on the biomechanical stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation 103, 1051-1056 (2001).
76. Maldonado, N. et al. A mechanistic analysis of the role of microcalcifications in atherosclerotic plaque stability: potential implications for plaque rupture. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 303, H619-H628 (2012).
77. Mauriello, A. et al. Coronary calcification identifies the vulnerable patient rather than the vulnerable plaque. Atherosclerosis 229, 124-129 (2013).
78. Burke, A. P. et al. Pathophysiology of calcium deposition in coronary arteries. Herz 26, 239-244 (2001).
79. Kataoka, Y. et al. Spotty calcification as a marker of accelerated progression of coronary atherosclerosis: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59, 1592-1597 (2012).
80. Ehara, S. et al. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 110, 3424-3429 (2004).
81. van Velzen, J. E. et al. Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 18, 893-903 (2011).
82. Joshi, N. V. et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet 383, 705-713 (2014).
83. Caro, C. G., Fitz-Gerald, J. M. & Schroter, R. C. Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature 223, 1159-1160 (1969).
84. Friedman, M. H., Bargeron, C. B., Deters, O. J., Hutchins, G. M. & Mark, F. F. Correlation between wall shear and intimal thickness at a coronary artery branch. Atherosclerosis 68, 27-33 (1987).
85. Koskinas, K. C. et al. Natural history of experimental coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in relation to endothelial shear stress: a serial, in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 121, 2092-2101 (2010).
86. Malek, A. M., Alper, S. L. & Izumo, S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282, 2035-2042 (1999).
87. Wentzel, J. J. et al. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc. Res. 96, 234-243 (2012).
88. Chatzizisis, Y. S. et al. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49, 2379-2393 (2007).
89. Slager, C. J. et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2, 456-464 (2005).
90. Samady, H. et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 124, 779-788 (2011).
91. Fukumoto, Y. et al. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51, 645-650 (2008).
92. Falk, E., Shah, P. K. & Fuster, V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 92, 657-671 (1995).
93. Puri, R., Nicholls, S. J., Ellis, S. G., Tuzcu, E. M. & Kapadia, S. R. High-risk coronary atheroma: the interplay between ischemia, plaque burden, and disease progression. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63, 1134-1140 (2014).
94. Hachamovitch, R. et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 97, 535-543 (1998).
95. Shaw, L. J. et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117, 1283-1291 (2008).
96. Fearon, W. F. Is a myocardial infarction more likely to result from a mild coronary lesion or an ischemia-producing one? Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 4, 539-541 (2011).
97. Fihn, S. D. et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, e44-e164 (2012).
98. Kim, H. J. et al. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 3195-3209 (2010).
99. Taylor, C. A., Fonte, T. A. & Min, J. K. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 61, 2233-2241 (2013).
100. Nieman, K. & de Feijter, P. J. Aerodynamics in cardiac CT. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 6, 853-854 (2013).
101. Ramkumar, P. G., Mitsouras, D., Feldman, C. L., Stone, P. H. & Rybicki, F. J. New advances in cardiac computed tomography. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 24, 596-603 (2009).
102. Slager, C. J. et al. The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat. Clin. Pract Cardiovasc. Med. 2, 401-407 (2005).
103. Gimbrone, M. A. Jr, Topper, J. N., Nagel, T., Anderson, K. R. & Garcia-Cardena, G. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 902, 230-239 (2000).
104. Brooks, A. R., Lelkes, P. I. & Rubanyi, G. M. Gene expression profiling of human aortic endothelial cells exposed to disturbed flow and steady laminar flow. Physiol. Genomics 9, 27-41 (2002).
105. Chatzizisis, Y. S. et al. Augmented expression and activity of extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes in regions of low endothelial shear stress colocalize with coronary atheromata with thin fibrous caps in pigs. Circulation 123, 621-630 (2011).
106. Koskinas, K. C. et al. Synergistic effect of local endothelial shear stress and systemic hypercholesterolemia on coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and composition in pigs. Int. J. Cardiol. 169, 394-401 (2013).
107. Stone, P. H. et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION Study. Circulation 126, 172-181 (2012).
108. Frauenfelder, T. et al. In-vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results. Eur. Radiol. 17, 1291-1300 (2007).
109. Jin, S. et al. Flow patterns and wall shear stress distributions at atherosclerotic-prone sites in a human left coronary artery-an exploration using combined methods of CT and computational fluid dynamics. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 5, 3789-3791 (2004).
110. Borkin, M. A. et al. Evaluation of artery visualizations for heart disease diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 2479-2488 (2011).
111. Gijsen, F. J. et al. 3D reconstruction techniques of human coronary bifurcations for shear stress computations. J. Biomech. 47, 39-43 (2014).
112. Rikhtegar, F. et al. Choosing the optimal wall shear parameter for the prediction of plaque location-A patient-specific computational study in human left coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 221, 432-437 (2012).
113. Bech, G. J. et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 103, 2928-2934 (2001).
114. Gijsen, F. J. et al. Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 295, H1608-H1614 (2008).
115. Yong, A. S. et al. Intracoronary shear-related up-regulation of platelet P-selectin and platelet-monocyte aggregation despite the use of aspirin and clopidogrel. Blood 117, 11-20 (2011).
116. Versteeg, D. et al. Monocyte toll-like receptor 2 and 4 responses and expression following percutaneous coronary intervention: association with lesion stenosis and fractional flow reserve. Heart 94, 770-776 (2008).
117. Shmilovich, H. et al. Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses. Atherosclerosis 219, 588-595 (2011).
118. Muller, O. et al. Long-term follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strategy in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 4, 1175-1182 (2011).
119. Koo, B. K. et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58, 1989-1997 (2011).
120. Min, J. K. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308, 1237-1245 (2012).
121. Kim, K. H. et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 7, 72-78 (2014).
122. US National Library of Medicine. Clinicaltrials.gov [online], http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01738828?term=GLOBAL&rank=1 (2014).
123. Narula, J. Are we up to speed?: from big data to rich insights in CV imaging for a hyperconnected world. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 6, 1222-1224 (2013).
124. Joshi, P. H. et al. A peripheral blood gene expression score is associated with plaque volume and phenotype by intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis: results from the ATLANTA study. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 3, 5-14 (2013).
125. Voros, S. et al. Apoprotein B, small-dense LDL and impaired HDL remodeling is associated with larger plaque burden and more noncalcified plaque as assessed by coronary CT angiography and intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter: results from the ATLANTA I study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2, e000344 (2013).
126. Hyafil, F. et al. Noninvasive detection of macrophages using a nanoparticulate contrast agent for computed tomography. Nat. Med. 13, 636-641 (2007).
127. Cormode, D. P. et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology 256, 774-782 (2010).
128. Rogers, I. S. et al. Feasibility of FDG imaging of the coronary arteries: comparison between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 388-397 (2010).