Re-regulating Japanese transactions: The competition law dimension

Japanese Governance: Beyond Japan Inc.

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 134-155

  Taylor, Veronica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903246249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203222256-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Aoki, M., 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
2. Carlile, L. and Tilton, M. (eds), 1998. Is Japan Really Changing Its Ways? Regulatory reform and the Japanese economy, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
3. First, H., 1995. 'Antitrust enforcement in Japan', Antitrust Law Journal, 64:137-82.
4. Fujikawa, T., 2000. 'Shihokaikaku wa seiken koeta kadai' [Legal reform is an issue that transcends (who holds) governmental power], Nikkei Shimbun, 23 April.
5. Gerber, DJ., 1998. 'Two models of competition law' in H. Ullrich (ed.), Comparative Competition Law: Approaching an international system of antitrust law, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden.
6. Grabowsky, P. and Braithwaite, J. (eds), 1992. Business Regulation and Australia's Future, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
7. Habermas, J., 1996. Between Facts and Norms, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (W. Rehg translation)
8. Haley, J.O., 1978. 'The myth of the reluctant litigant', Journal of Japanese Studies, 4(2):359-89.
9. Haley, J.O., 1997. 'Review of Tilton, Retrained Trade: Cartels in Japan's basic materialsindustries', Journal of Japanese Studies, 23(1):144-48.
10. Haley, J.O., 1998. 'Culture, competition and deregulation: Japan's challenge to international harmonisation of competition law', in H. Ullrich (ed.), Comparative CompetitionLaw: Approaching an international system of antitrust law, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden.
11. Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), 1999. Guidelines for Patent and Know-how Licensing Agreements under the Antimonopoly Act [Provisional English translation]. See also the Japanese version in Koseitorihikii'inkai, Tokkyo/Nohau raisensu keiyaku ni kansuru dokusen kinshi hojo no hoshin [Treatment of Patent and Know-How Licensing Contracts under the Antimonopoly Law], Koseitorihiki, 588:57-74
12. Johnson, C., 1995. Japan: Who governs? The rise of the developmental state, Norton, New York and London.
13. Kamiya, Masako, 2001. 'Reform of Japan's code of civil procedure', Australian Journal of Asian Law, 3:1.
14. Kitagawa, Zentaro, 2000. 'Shohishakeiyaku rippo ni nokosareta mono-oboegaki' [Notes on issues neglected by the Consumer Contract Law drafting process], NBL Henshubu, 676:10-18
15. Kozuka, Shoichiro, 1999. Competition law and contracts in Japan, Paper presented at the Asian Law Centre Symposium, 'Legal Crisis?', Asian Law Centre, University of Melbourne, 12-14 August.
16. Macaulay, S., 1991. 'Long-term continuing relations: the American experience regulating dealerships and franchises', in C. Joerges (ed.), Franchising the Law: Theoretical and comparative approaches in Europe and the United States, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden: 179-237.
17. Makino, Junji, 2000. Head, Legal Affairs Department, Toyota Corp. Remarks at Nagoya University Law Faculty 50th Anniversary Symposium 'Kokusaika no naka no shihoseidokaikaku'[Legal System Reform Amidst Internationalisation], 14 April.
18. Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), 2000. Tsushohakusho 2000 [White Paper 2000], Okurasho insastukyoku, Tokyo.
19. Morita, Osamu, 1998. 'Dokkinho ihankoi no shihojo no koryoku' sairon' [Validity of contracts in breach of the Antimonopoly Law revisited], Keizaihogakkai nenpo [Economic Law Association Annual], 19:99-122
20. Murakami, Masahiro, 2000. 'Dokusenkinshihoihankoi ni tsuite no shijin ni yoru sashitome seikyuken (1)' [The individual's right to an injunction for conduct contravening the Antimonopoly Law (1)], NBL Henshubu, 686:6.
21. NBL Henshubu, 1996. 'NBL Joho: Kotoriin Heisei 7 nendo no kachokin nofu meirei no unyo jokyo o matomeru' [NBL Update: Fair Trade Commission reports on application of orderso for payment of fines during Heisei 7] NBL No. 591, 15 April 1996, p.68.
22. NBL Henshubu, 2000. 'Dokusenkinshihono ichibu o kaisei suru horitsuan ni tsuite' [The Bill to partially amend the Antimonopoly Law], NBL Henshubu, 686:63.
23. Ochiai, Seiichi et al., 2000. 'Kiseikanwa to shohishakeiyakuho'[Deregulation and the Consumer Contract Law], NBL Henshubu, 678, 6 (Part 1) No. 679, 36 (Part 2) No. 684, 56 (Part 3).
24. Pempel, TJ., 1997. 'Regime shift: Japanese politics in a changing world economy', Journal of Japanese Studies, 23(2):333-61.
25. Pempel, TJ., 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative dynamics of the Japanese political economy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
26. Pempel, TJ., 1999. 'Structural gaiatsu: international finance and political change in Japan', Comparative Political Studies, 32(8):907-32.
27. Ramsayer, J.M., 1988. 'Reluctant litigant revisited: rationality and disputes in Japan', Journal of Japanese Studies, 1(11):111-23.
28. Ramsayer, J.M., and Rosenbluth, F.M., 1989. Japan's Political Marketplace, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
29. Schaede, U., 2001. Cooperative Capitalism: Self-regulation, trade associations and the Antimonopoly Law in Japan, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Shihokaikaku shingikai [Legal System Reform Commission], 2000. http://kantei.go.jp/sihouseido/dai18/18siryou.html.
31. Shiraishi, Tadashi, 2000. University of Tokyo, Faculty of Law, Author's interview April 2000.
32. Shiseido Tokyo Hanbai KK v Fujiki Honten KK (1994) Tokyo Koto Saibansho, 1507 Hanrei Jiho 43, 14 September 1994.
33. Steele, S., 2000. 'Evaluating the new Japanese civil rehabilitation law', Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2(1): 53-87.
34. Supreme Court, 1998. Saiko Saibansho, 52 Minshu 1866, 18 December 1998.
35. Tamblyn, J., 1992. 'Progress towards a more responsive trade practices strategy', in P. Grabowsky and J. Braithwaite (eds), Business Regulation and Australia's Future, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra: 151-67.
36. Taylor, V., 1993. 'Continuing transactions and persistent myths: contracts in contemporary Japan', Melbourne University Law Review, 19(2):352-98.
37. Taylor, V., 1995. 'Harmonising competition law within APEC: vertical restraints and US- Japan trade disputes', Journal of Australian Corporate Law, 5(3):379-89.
38. Taylor, V., 1997. 'Consumer contract governance in a deregulating Japan', Victoria Universityof Wellington Law Review, 27(1):99-120.
39. Tilton, M., 1996. Restrained Trade: Cartels in Japan's basic materials industries, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
40. Ullrich, H. (ed.), 1998. Comparative Competition Law: Approaching an international system of Antitrust Law, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden.
41. Uchida, Takashi, 2000. University of Tokyo, Faculty of Law. Author's interview, April 2000 reporting on interviews Uchida conducted with Shiseido in 1997.
42. Vogel, S.K., 1999. 'When interests are not preferences: the cautionary tale of Japanese consumers', Comparative Politics, 31(2):187-208.