Virtual Retrofit Model for aging commercial buildings in a smart grid environment

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 80, Issue , 2014, Pages 424-435

  Woo, Jeong Han ^a   Menassa, Carol ^b  

^a MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Building energy efficiency; Building Information Modeling; Building retrofit; Interoperability; Multi criteria decision making; Stakeholder survey

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INTEROPERABILITY; OFFICE BUILDINGS; RETROFITTING; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; SURVEYS; VIRTUAL ADDRESSES; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; GRID COMPUTING; MODELS; SMART POWER GRIDS; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

AGENT-BASED MODEL; BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BUILDING INFORMATION MODEL - BIM; BUILDING RETROFITS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDINGS; INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84903194888     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. CBECS Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey 2003 Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (June 2012) Washington, DC www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/archive/cbecs/cbecs2003/overview.pdf
2. U.S. Department of Energy Securing America's Future with Energy Efficient Buildings 2012 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/about.html (21.06.13)
3. U.S. Green Building Council A National Green Building Research Agenda 2008 http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs3402.pdf (16.01.12)
4. G. Liu et al. Advanced Energy Retrofit Guide for Office Buildings 2011 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA
5. H.M. Bernstein, and M.A. Russo Business Case for Energy Efficient Building Retrofit and Renovation 2011 McGraw Hill New York, NY
6. C. Gellings, G. Wikler, and D. Ghosh Assessment of U.S. electric end-use energy efficiency potential The Electricity Journal 19 9 2006 55 69 (Pubitemid 44688876)
7. H. Granade, J. Creyts, A. Derkach, P. Farese, S. Nyquist, and K. Ostrowski Unlocking Energy Efficiency in U.S. Economy 2009 McKinsey & Company
8. J. Gershman Fake Green Labels 2009 NY Post http://www.nypost.com/f/print/ news/opinion/opedcolumnists/item-aU9PWSSD4p71LigLp0z4eO (4.03.10)
9. C. Menassa, S. Mangasarian, M. El Asmar, and C. Kirar Energy consumption evaluation of United States Navy LEED certified buildings Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, American Society of Civil Engineers 26 1 2012 46 53
10. A. Dell'lsola, and S. Kirk Life Cycle Costing of Facilities 2003 Reed Construction Data Kingston, MA
11. J.-H. Woo, C. Diggelman, B. Abushakra, and G. Corliss Achieving Energy Efficiency with As-built BIM 2010 BIM Academic Workshop, Ecobuild America Washington, DC
12. J. Yudelson Greening Existing Buildings 2010 Green Source/McGraw-Hill New York, NY
13. C. Menassa Evaluating sustainable retrofits in existing buildings under uncertainty Energy and Buildings 43 12 2011 3576 3583
14. L. Roberts Pros and Cons of Higher Efficiency Systems 2009 Design & Trades Cromwell, CT
15. V.I. Soebarto, and T.J. Williamson Multi-criteria assessment of building performance: theory and implementation Building and Environment 36 6 2001 681 690 (Pubitemid 32546111)
16. E. Asadi, M. Gameiro da Silva, C. Henggeler Antunes, and L. Dias Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: a model and an application Energy and Buildings 44 2012 81 87
17. K. Alanne Selection of renovation actions using multicriteria Knapsack model Automation in Construction 13 3 2004 377 391
18. M. Weyers, H. Strydom, and A. Huisamen Triangulation in social work research: the theory and examples of its practical application Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk 44 2 2011 207 222
19. U. Pesovic, Z. Jovanovic, S. Randjic, and D. Markovic Benchmarking performance and energy efficiency of microprocessors for wireless sensor network applications MIPRO 2012 Proceedings of the 35th International Convention 2012
20. C. Menassa, and B. Baer A framework to assess the role of stakeholders in sustainable building retrofit decisions Sustainable Cities and Society 10 2014 2014 207 221
21. A. Campos, M. Marques, and R. Neves-Silva A decision support system for energy-efficiency investments on building renovations Energy Conference and Exhibition (EnergyCon), 2010 IEEE International 2010 102 107
22. H. Yin, P. Stack, and K. Menzel Decision Support for Building Renovation Strategies 2011 Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE Miami, FL 834 841
23. E. Triantaphyllou, and S.H. Mann Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice 2 1 1995 35 44
24. C. Huizenga, K. Laeser, and E. Arens A Wed-Based Occupant Satisfaction Survey for Benchmarking Building Quality 2002 Indoor Air Santa Cruz, CA, USA 6
25. B. Bordass, and A. Leaman Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: a portfolio of feedback techniques Building Research and Information 33 4 2005 347 352 (Pubitemid 41351373)
26. P. Dahl Managing End-User Feedback in Sustainable Project Delivery 2008 The Pennsylvania State University
27. K. Stephan, and C. Menassa Agent-based modeling of impact of stakeholder requirements on sustainable retrofit of buildings Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 23-25 June 2013 Los Angeles, CA 2013 283 290
28. T. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
29. T. Saaty Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process International Journal of Services Sciences 1 1 2008 83 95