Identification and mapping of natural vegetation on a coastal site using a Worldview-2 satellite image

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 144, Issue , 2014, Pages 236-246

  Rapinel, Sébastien ^a,b   Clément, Bernard ^c   Magnanon, Sylvie ^a   Sellin, Vanessa ^a   Hubert Moy, Laurence ^b  

^a Service Animation   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

Object oriented classification; Remote sensing; Super spectral resolution; Vegetation formations; Very high spatial resolution

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; SATELLITE IMAGERY; VEGETATION MAPPING;

COASTAL SITES; LAND COVER; NATURAL VEGETATION; OBJECT ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE-SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGES; SUPER SPECTRAL RESOLUTION; VEGETATION FORMATIONS; VERY-HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS; WORLDVIEW-2;

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COASTAL ZONE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; NATURE CONSERVATION; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SATELLITE SENSOR; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION; THEMATIC MAPPING; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION; VEGETATION MAPPING;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MARSH; NONHUMAN; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEASHORE; SENSOR; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; VEGETATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FRANCE; PROCEDURES; SPACE FLIGHT; WETLAND;

ATLANTIC COAST [EUROPE]; ATLANTIC COAST [FRANCE]; FRANCE;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRANCE; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; SPACECRAFT; WETLANDS;

EID: 84903177783     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.027     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alexandridis T.K., Lazaridou E., Tsirika A., Zalidis G.C. Using earth observation to update a Natura 2000 habitat map for a wetland in Greece. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2243-2251.
2. Andresen T., Mott C., Schupferling R., Zimmermann S., Schneider T. Analise orientada a Objectos de Dados de Sensoriamento Remoto para a Obtençao de Parametros Aquaticos/Terrestres. Sensoriamento Remoto e SIG Avançados 2007, 241-250. (in Portuguese).
3. Arroyo L.A., Johansen K., Armston J., Phinn S. Integration of LiDAR and QuickBird imagery for mapping riparian biophysical parameters and land cover types in Australian tropical savannas. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:598-606.
4. Baker C., Lawrence R., Montagne C., Patten D. Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM1 imagery and decision-tree-based models. Wetlands 2006, 26:465-474.
5. Belluco E., Camuffo M., Ferrari S., Modenese L., Silvestri S., Marani A., Marani M. Mapping salt-marsh vegetation by multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 105:54-67.
6. Berk A., Anderson G.P., Bernstein L.S., Acharya P.K., Dothe H., Matthew M.W., Adler-Golden S.M., Chetwynd J.H., Richtsmeier S.C., Pukall B., others MODTRAN4 radiative transfer modeling for atmospheric correction. SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation 1999, 348-353.
7. Beven K., Kirkby M. Aphysically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 1979, 24:43-69.
8. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65:2-16.
9. Bock M., Xofis P., Mitchley J., Rossner G., Wissen M. Object-oriented methods for habitat mapping at multiple scales - case studies from Northern Germany and Wye Downs, UK. J.Nat. Conserv. 2005, 13:75-89.
10. Vanden Borre J., Paelinckx D., Mücher C.A., Kooistra L., Haest B., De Blust G., Schmidt A.M. Integrating remote sensing in Natura 2000 habitat monitoring: prospects on the way forward. J.Nat. Conserv. 2011, 19:116-125.
11. Burel F., Baudry J. Species biodiversity in changing agricultural landscapes: a case study in the Pays d'Auge, France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1995, 55:193-200.
12. Burnett C., Blaschke T. Amulti-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis. Ecol. Model 2003, 168:233-249.
13. Castillejo-González I.L., López-Granados F., García-Ferrer A., Peña-Barragán J.M., Jurado-Expósito M., de la Orden M.S., González-Audicana M. Object- and pixel-based analysis for mapping crops and their agro-environmental associated measures using QuickBird imagery. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2009, 68:207-215.
14. Congalton R.G., Oderwald R.G., Mead R.A. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1983, 49:1671-1678.
15. Dalmayne J., Möckel T., Prentice H.C., Schmid B.C., Hall K. Assessment of fine-scale plant species beta diversity using WorldView-2 satellite spectral dissimilarity. Ecol. Inform. 2013, 18:1-9.
16. Davranche A., Lefebvre G., Poulin B. Wetland monitoring using classification trees and SPOT-5 seasonal time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:552-562.
17. Delassus L., Magnanon S. Une classification emboîtée de la végétation de Basse-Normandie, Bretagne et des Pays de la Loire. J.Bot. Soc. Bot. Fr. 2013, 62:7-14. (in French).
18. Dissanska M., Bernier M., Payette S., others Object-based classification of very high resolution panchromatic images for evaluating recent change in the structure of patterned peatlands. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 35:189-215.
19. Dogan O.K., Akyurek Z., Beklioglu M. Identification and mapping of submerged plants in a shallow lake using Quickbird satellite data. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2138-2143.
20. Dusseux P., Hubert-Moy L., Lecerf R., Gong X., Corpetti T. Identification of grazed and mown grasslands using a time series of high-spatial-resolution remote sensing images. Presented at the 6th International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images (Multi-temp), Trento, Italy 2011, 145-148.
21. Eckert S. Improved forest biomass and carbon estimations using texture measures from WorldView-2 satellite data. Remote Sens. 2012, 4:810-829.
22. Eppink F.V., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Rietveld P. Modelling biodiversity and land use: urban growth, agriculture and nature in a wetland area. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 51:201-216.
23. Erbek F.S., Özkan C., Taberner M. Comparison of maximum likelihood classification method with supervised artificial neural network algorithms for land use activities. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:1733-1748.
24. Feilhauer H., Thonfeld F., Faude U., He K.S., Rocchini D., Schmidtlein S. Assessing floristic composition with multispectral sensors-a comparison based on monotemporal and multiseasonal field spectra. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2013, 21:218-229.
25. Förster M., Frick A., Walentowski H., Kleinschmit B. Approaches to utilising QuickBird data for the monitoring of NATURA 2000 habitats. Community Ecol. 2008, 9:155-168.
26. Fuller L.M., Morgan T.R., Aichele S. Wetland Delineation with IKONOS High-resolution Satellite Imagery (No. 2006-5051), Scientific Investigations Report 2005, USGS.
27. Ghioca-Robrecht D.M., Johnston C.A., Tulbure M.G. Assessing the use of multiseason QuickBird imagery for mapping invasive species in a Lake Erie coastal Marsh. Wetlands 2008, 28:1028-1039.
28. Gibbons P., Zerger A., Jones S., Ryan P. Mapping vegetation condition in the context of biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2006, 7:S1-S2.
29. Gilmore M.S., Wilson E.H., Barrett N., Civco D.L., Prisloe S., Hurd J.D., Chadwick C. Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower Connecticut River tidal marsh. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112:4048-4060.
30. Girard M.C., Girard C.M. Traitement des données de télédétection 1999, Dunod, Paris, (in French).
31. Harris A., Bryant R.G. Amulti-scale remote sensing approach for monitoring northern peatland hydrology: present possibilities and future challenges. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2178-2188.
32. Hay G.J., Castilla G. Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): a new name for a new discipline. Object-based Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography 2008, 75-89. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. T. Blaschke, S. Lang, G.F. Hay, W. Cartwright, G. Gartner, L. Meng, M.P. Peterson (Eds.).
33. Heller N.E., Zavaleta E.S. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:14-32.
34. I-MAGE CONSULT Cartographie des zones humides du bassin Seine-Normandie (Rapport final) 2006, AESN, (in French).
35. Jenkins R., Frazier P. High-resolution remote sensing of upland swamp boundaries and vegetation for baseline mapping and monitoring. Wetlands 2010, 30:531-540.
36. Johansen K., Phinn S., Witte C. Mapping of riparian zone attributes using discrete return LiDAR, QuickBird and SPOT-5 imagery: assessing accuracy and costs. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:2679-2691.
37. Jones K., Lanthier Y., van der Voet P., van Valkengoed E., Taylor D., Fernandez-Prieto D. Monitoring and assessment of wetlands using earth observation: the GlobWetland project. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2154-2169.
38. Ke Y., Quackenbush L.J., Im J. Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:1141-1154.
39. Laba M., Downs R., Smith S., Welsh S., Neider C., White S., Richmond M., Philpot W., Baveye P. Mapping invasive wetland plants in the Hudson River national estuarine research reserve using quickbird satellite imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112:286-300.
40. Laben C.A., Brower B.V. Process for Enhancing the Spatial Resolution of Multispectral Imagery Using Pan-sharpening 2000.
41. Lang S., Langanke T. Object-based mapping and object-relationship modeling for land use classes and habitats. Photogramm. Fernerkund. Geoinf. 2006, 2006:5.
42. Lasaponara R., Lanorte A. On the capability of satellite VHR QuickBird data for fuel type characterization in fragmented landscape. Ecol. Model. 2007, 204:79-84.
43. Lu D., Hetrick S., Moran E. Impervious surface mapping with Quickbird imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32:2519-2533.
44. Lucas R., Medcalf K., Brown A., Bunting P., Breyer J., Clewley D., Keyworth S., Blackmore P. Updating the phase 1 habitat map of Wales, UK, using satellite sensor data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66:81-102.
45. MacAlister C., Mahaxay M. Mapping wetlands in the Lower Mekong Basin for wetland resource and conservation management using Landsat ETM images and field survey data. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2130-2137.
46. MacFaden S.W., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Royar A.R., Lu J.W.T., Rundle A.G. High-resolution tree canopy mapping for New York City using LIDAR and object-based image analysis. J.Appl. Remote Sens. 2012, 6(1):063567.
47. MacKay H., Finlayson C.M., Fernandez-Prieto D., Davidson N., Pritchard D., Rebelo L.-M. The role of Earth Observation (EO) technologies in supporting implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2234-2242.
48. Mallinis G., Koutsias N., Tsakiri-Strati M., Karteris M. Object-based classification using Quickbird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63:237-250.
49. Mutanga O., Adam E., Cho M.A. High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 18:399-406.
50. Otukei J.R., Blaschke T. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12(Supplement 1):S27-S31.
51. Ozdemir I., Karnieli A. Predicting forest structural parameters using the image texture derived from WorldView-2 multispectral imagery in a dryland forest. Isr. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2011, 13:701-710.
52. O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., MacFaden S., Pelletier K.C. Incorporating contextual information into object-based image analysis workflows. Presented at the ASPRS 2011 Annual Conference 2011, (Milwaukee, Wisconsin).
53. Pontius R. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2000, 66:1011-1016.
54. Pu R., Landry S. Acomparative analysis of high spatial resolution IKONOS and WorldView-2 imagery for mapping urban tree species. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124:516-533.
55. Richards J. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis 1999, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
56. Rodwell J., Dring J., Pignatt S., Schaminé J., Mucina L. Scientific Background to the EUNIS Habitat Classification: Phytosociological Relationships of EUNIS Habitats 1998, Unit of Vegetation Science - Lancaster University & European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation, Paris.
57. Sellin V., Gourmelon F., Magnanon S., Debaine F., Hubert-Moy L., Rapinel S., Janvre A., Clément B., David L., Delassus L., Dhervé D., Nabucet J. Cartographie des grands types de végétation par télédétection: étude de faisabilité (Bretagne, Basse-Normandie et Pays-de-la-Loire) 2013, CBN and LETG, Brest (in French).
58. Shuman C.S., Ambrose R.F. Acomparison of remote sensing and ground-based methods for monitoring wetland restoration success. Restor. Ecol. 2003, 11:325-333.
59. Sobocinski K.L., Borde A.B., Miller L.M., Thom R.M., Tear L.M. Columbia River Estuary Habitat Monitoring Pilot Field Study and Remote Sensing Analysis 2006.
60. Töyrä J., Pietroniro A. Towards operational monitoring of a northern wetland using geomatics-based techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 97:174-191.
61. Upadhyay P., Kumar A., Roy P.S., Ghosh S.K., Gilbert I. Effect on specific crop mapping using WorldView-2 multispectral add-on bands: soft classification approach. J.Appl. Remote Sens. 2012, 6:063524.
62. Walker K.J., Stevens P.A., Stevens D.P., Mountford J.O., Manchester S.J., Pywell R.F. The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 119:1-18.
63. Wang L., Sousa W.P., Gong P., Biging G.S. Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 91:432-440.
64. Wolter P.T., Johnston C.A., Niemi G.J. Mapping submergent aquatic vegetation in the US Great Lakes using Quickbird satellite data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26:5255-5274.
65. Xie Y., Sha Z., Yu M. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. J.Plant Ecol. 2008, 1:9-23.
66. Zak M.R., Cabido M. Spatial patterns of the Chaco vegetation of central Argentina: Integration of remote sensing and phytosociology. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2002, 5:213-226.