Overgeneralizing belonging: Limited exposure to baby-faced targets increases the feeling of social belonging

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 273-277

  Sacco, Donald F ^a   Wilson, John Paul ^b   Hugenberg, Kurt ^b   Wirth, James H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

face perception; facial morphology; social belonging; social perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; IMAGINATION; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFFECT; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903160893     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.901286     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Blackwell, K. C., &, Smith, D. M. (2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 179-190.
2. Biernat, M., &, Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
3. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., &, Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352-362.
4. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., &, Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
5. Keating, C. F., Randall, D. W., Kendrick, T., &, Gutshall, K. A. (2003). Do baby-faced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 89-109.
6. Knowles, M. L. (2013). Belonging regulation through the use of (para)social surrogates. In C. N. DeWall. (. Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (. pp. 275-285). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., &, Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1239-1252.
8. Sacco, D. F., Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., &, Hugenberg, K. (in press). Reactions to social inclusion and exclusion as a function of perceived ingroup similarity. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice.
9. Twenge, J. M., Zhang, L., Catanese, K. R., Dolan-Pascoe, B., Lyche, L. E., &, Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Replenishing connectedness: Reminders of social activity reduce aggression after social exclusion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 205-224.
10. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
11. Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., &, Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869-882.
12. Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., &, Lee, H. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25, 306-338.
13. Zebrowitz, L. A., &, Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497-1517.